MovieChat Forums > Swept Away (2002) Discussion > A romantic comedy that's actually really...

A romantic comedy that's actually really good


This is a 2002 remake of the 1974 Italian film starring Madonna and written & directed by Madonna's (then) husband Guy Ritchie. Despite what you may have heard, it's fun and entertaining, but also thought-provoking and moving.

For the record, I'm not a follower of Madonna; I neither love her nor hate her. In fact, I almost didn't watch this film because she starred in it, but I gave-in because I'm a sucker for survival-on-deserted-island flicks. I'd also like to point out that I've never seen the original '74 film, so I have no nostalgic bias.

"Swept Away" failed at the box office in 2002, but only because it was barely released to theaters and critics condemned it before it was even completed. It subsequently swept (away) the Razzies as the worst picture and a bandwagon effect developed with everyone jumping into the negative feeding frenzy.

Is it really THAT bad? No. Not even close. "Swept Away" starts as a fun, entertaining farce and morphs into a potent social commentary and, finally, a moving love story with great Mediterranean scenery (shot in Sardinia and Malta). The movie will make you laugh, make you angry, make you cry and ultimately move you. It did for me anyway. But it will only have such an effect IF you refuse to listen to the drivel of the cookie-cutter critics and give it a chance.

As for Madonna, she's no Meryl Streep but she successfully makes you despise Amber in Act 1 and feel for her later on. She made me believe Amber was a real person. What more do you want?

I'm not an anti-capitalist in any way, shape or form, but the film points out the flaws of this system. It also effectively reveals how money/materialism can't of itself give true happiness, love or fulfillment. Amber had everything but was the most unhappy, loathsome person you'd likely ever meet.

One reviewer referred to the film as a "wife beater's fantasy" but failed to point out that it could just as easily be called a "Man torturer's fantasy" or "Man emasculator's fantasy." Let's be evenhanded with our appraisals.

I admit the physical abuse of Amber on the island (slapping, kicking and especially the faux-rape) is disturbing and almost tempted me to tune out, but then I saw what the filmmakers were shooting for, the filmmakers being Madonna and her husband.

In our society we've been misled to believe that mental abuse is less abusive because it's not physical. This film effectively shows that mental abuse can be just as bad, if not worse.

SPOILER ALERT

During the first half hour Amber horribly torments and emasculates Pepe (and others) because she's a spoiled brat and in control. When the tables are turned and she loses control on the island Pepe utilizes extreme measures to de-spoil her. In other words, Pepe realized that Amber was so far gone -- so utterly spoiled -- that she literally needed slapped back to reality.

This is in line with a biblical proverb "Blows and wounds cleanse away evil and beatings purge the inmost being." Let's face it, some people are so far gone, so spoiled, that they literally need the snot beat out of them -- that's the only thing that's going to wake 'em up to reality. Apparently Pepe realized this on the island and acted accordingly. Do I think he goes too far? Yes, but -- then again -- I wasn't the one mentally tormented for days on the boat and totally emasculated in front of others. Regardless, the story shows that his methods worked -- Amber was humiliated to the point of seeing life from a totally different perspective, a much-needed new perspective.

Pepe's discipline ultimately brings out spiritual character in Amber to the point where she refuses to call on passing boats to save her from her exile (two moving scenes, by the way). Why? Because she's been delivered from the bondage of selfishness, arrogance and materialism; she has experienced true love, fulfillment, team-work, companionship and independence (remember, she DOES learn how to fish for herself) for the first time in her life. It becomes more precious than gold to her and she doesn't want to let it go.

Again, I think Pepe goes too far with the physical abuse (actually, I don't believe in physical ABUSE at all), but the filmmakers are (evidently) saying she was so far gone that extreme measures were necessary. Besides, didn't she make her own bed, so to speak? Let her lie in it.

END SPOILER

The fact that Madonna -- one of the most successful women in history and the original "material girl" -- utilized this film to make this point speaks volumes. Is it a sign of weakness? No, it's a sign of enlightenment and spiritual strength.

BOTTOM LINE: "Swept Away" is better than similar flicks like "Six Days, Seven Nights" with Harrison Ford and Anne Heche. Why? Because, not only is it fun and entertaining, it's also thought-provoking and moving. The fact that it's short-n-sweet at 1 hour, 29 minutes, is a plus. Really, what more do you want from a stranded-on-a-deserted-island romantic comedy?

reply

I hope you saw the original 1974 Lina Wertmüller film.

reply

I think he pretty clearly said “I'd also like to point out that I've never seen the original '74 film, so I have no nostalgic bias.”

reply

I didn’t read the whole thing as it is very lengthy and I skipped over spoiler alert 1 and spoiler alert 2 and bottom line. Actually I didn’t get past 2nd paragraph.

There’s no comparison to the original. It’s in Italian so there are subtitles. But the original is a classic. So if you do see the one with Madonna, try seeing the original too. It’s on the Criterion channel.

reply

Wow, that was really well written, nice work! Unlike you, I am a Madonna fan, although I have only very rarely been impressed by her acting work. For me it’s always been something of an oddity that someone can be such a captivating presence in her live performance and music videos, yet so routinely wooden and unconvincing on film.

I suppose that’s why I was so easily convinced to avoid this movie like the plague, it just seemed too likely to me that the reviews and general public opinion that this was a vapid vanity piece were correct. It’s actually quite weird that you should post this because I’ve only just recently been toying with the idea of checking it out for myself. After reading your articulate review I’ve gone from undecided to quite keen to do just that, so thank you.

I also appreciate you clearly marking the spoilers (which I skipped reading), it’s quite rare for someone to be as considerate when sharing their thoughts online.

Thanks again Wuchak. That was a pleasure to read. 👍👍

reply

My pleasure, Theta. Don't hesitate to share any comments after viewing; I'd be curious what you think of the film and it would be a good balance to my commentary.

reply

Will do mate, hopefully I can track it down for a weekend watch. I’ll definitely jump back in here and share my thoughts.

reply