You could indeed have said it better yourself, and you have, multiple times. You are much more expressive and interesting than the poster you replied to.
Also, I disagree with lots of what you say.
The Wire did indeed go for cheap thrills at times - brothel busts played for titillation, highly dramatized last-second near-miss arrest attempts, betrayal, character corruption, badass assassins, etc. (This is what I remember from watching it once several years ago.) I'll grant that The Wire's reputation for being restrained is mostly deserved, but it digresses plenty for the sake of entertainment or when the writer's clearly thought something would be "cool" (the cringeworthy self-quoting epigraphs drove me nuts). All of that causes me to disagree with your claim that suspension of disbelief is not an issue. And to say that The Wire isn't "shock-oriented" is just silly - there's lots shocking about it, not the least the many unhappy endings it visits on the viewer.
The Wire leaves a bitter aftertaste and a lot of hard questions that demand an answer.
It leaves questions that are relevant to the circumstances of the real world around us (which The Shield does a little, though not much) rather than the typical abstract questions of right and wrong that most dramas would take on in protected settings where the viewer doesn't have to worry much about his/her own culpability and inextricability from the moral gray areas in question. In this regard, I basically agree with you. In that sense you could argue that the show has a "higher calling" than The Shield, and I would buy that.
The Shield relies heavily on luck and coincidence.
A fair criticism, especially when some of the chess pieces are being moved around for the endgame (Vic fails to kill Shane by dumb luck, then Shane fails to kill Ronnie by dumb luck, etc.). But The Shield doesn't really have a stake in being "realistic" as The Wire does (though I would argue, as I have, that The Wire can't make up its mind about whether that's really what it wants), and I find it a bit odd that your defense of The Wire is so high-minded and your criticism of The Shield so narrow and technical.
A strong drama introduces tragic characters, whose demise is therefore brought on by their own actions, in a sense both punishing and redeeming.
This is exactly what The Shield does extremely well, most obviously to Vic, but also to every member of the Strike Team and plenty of other characters.
As for playing for shock value in general, I thought The Shield was relatively subdued as far as that went. Maybe I feel that way because Breaking Bad seems like a natural comparison and goes further in its acidic betrayals and horrifying outcomes, but I was basically expecting all hell to break loose in the finale of The Shield (given its reputation) and was pleased to see that it was fairly subdued and quite classy.
Anyway, I like your posts, so I replied. Make of that what you will.
reply
share