That child is not 4 years old!

No, no, no. I was thinking 6-7.

The actress was 7 but she could pass for 10

There are relatively intelligent four year-olds, but she's definitely way too mature for a four-year old. I learned to read and write at the physical age of four, but I was probably way childish and idiotic anyway. That 'daughter' is way too mature and mentally advanced, behaviourally 'adult' to be four, but what else is new, movies lie to you all the time. It'd have been impossible to get a kid that age to act the way the scenes require.

LOL my thoughts exactly

I don't mind that kind of suspension of disbelief, if everything else is good - sometimes moviemakers have to compromise for the sake of getting some scene(s) done. I think 'that child' (and I think you are actually talking about the second movie's kid, not this movie's - they're both supposedly four, neither look or behave like it) does a fine job displaying what she's supposed to display, but I agree that the age number should've been raised a bit higher for believability's sake.

Then again, these movies are such stupid cartoons anyway with so many implausibilities and coincidences, what age someone is supposed to be versus how they look and behave is the LEAST of this movie's stupidities.