MovieChat Forums > Ken Park (2003) Discussion > If pedophiles made films for pedophiles ...

If pedophiles made films for pedophiles . . .


and were given a huge budget, crew, etc to produce them, I think they's come up with something along the lines of Larry Clarks body of work.

Just look at the crap he's done, it's all kids, kids, and more kids, tossing off, fu_cking, oral, you name it he has them doing it half naked or completely in the nuddy. It's acting out if you ask me. I know he uses actors that only 'look' young, but it all amounts to the same thing.

Makes you wonder if pedophilia will one day be acceptable after watching crap like this. How anyone could enjoy watching this, let alone praise this film in any way is beyond me! Larry Clark is a kiddy fiddler. One who seems to have a preferance for young boys judging by his films, although i'd say he probably isn't that fussy :P

reply

I'm going to have to agree with you. I mean, this guys made "Kids", "Bully" and now this piece of crap. Sure, the actors may be over 20 but they're high schoolers in the movie. Sick, sick, sick!


If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy?

reply

Or Roman Polanski.

,Said the Shotgun to the Head--
Saul Williams

reply

Dude, if all pedophiles were as talented as Clark I would push for film school as part of the rehab/prison program for those that get caught.

,Said the Shotgun to the Head--
Saul Williams

reply

I agree 100%. Also, Martin Scorsese must be a murderous criminal. I mean, cmon, have you seen Goodfellas?

reply

I have to agree with the OP.

I saw Kids first and loved it. Thought it was original. Then I saw Wassup Rockers and was like "More with the half naked lttle boys? Then I saw Bully and really liked it, but again with the kids *beep* This was just flat out overboard.

First of all, this sex is unsimulated. Do these actors think they will have a legit career after getting eaten out onscreen by a highschooler? Or jerking off in full frame from start to full on ejaculation? Or sucking off two dudes at once on camera while one fingers me? I sure wouldn't put this on my resume as an actor if I were them.

But as far as Larry Clark's prediliction for sexualizing kids, it could be excusable if it were just one or maybe two films in a long filmography that dealt with this, but this is all the dude does. Frankly, I think you're naive if you don't think he's fulfilling some sick fetish with these movies.

reply

First of all, this sex is unsimulated. Do these actors think they will have a legit career after getting eaten out onscreen by a highschooler? Or jerking off in full frame from start to full on ejaculation? Or sucking off two dudes at once on camera while one fingers me? I sure wouldn't put this on my resume as an actor if I were them.


http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0710447/?ref_=rvi_nm

James Ransone, the dude who jerked off (who was 23 at the time, mind you), has had quite a few roles since then.

Tiffany Limos (Peaches) hasn't, but do you know her story? Maybe she didn't feel that acting was her thing - not unlike thousands of other people on IMDB with one or two acting credits who DIDN'T get eaten out on screen.

Seriously. Get over yourself. If you don't like it, don't watch it. You knew exactly what you were in for, yet you choose to complain anyway. Like it or not, movies like Ken Park and Kids are dead-on accurate portrayals of life. The sh** really happens.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I agree with you 110 %

reply

Well, your entire premise is off since pedos like children. That is to say, not people who have secondary-sex characteristics (like boobs and stuff). You know who do have those characteristics? Teenagers. Who are not the same as children.

Also, filming graphic stories about teenagers (especially stuff that, you know, actually happens sometimes) is not the same as wanting to nail them.

So, your post sort of fails on all accounts. I'd suggest you try harder next time, if I thought the suggestion wouldn't fall on willfully deaf ears.

$ยง "You don't win. You just do a little better each time." ~o~

reply