MovieChat Forums > The Way of the Gun (2000) Discussion > A few questions for those in the know...

A few questions for those in the know...


After all the new activity on this message board, I went back and saw the film last night. I caught a few more things that are interesting and could use some enlightenment, or at least opinions on what was going on.


Longbaugh vs. Parker:
Twice in the movie I notice this (well, this time I noticed it twice); that Longbaugh sets up a situation to kill Parker, by chance. The obvious scene was after the hearts game, when Longbaugh says he forgot his jacket in the room, knowing full that Robin had the shotgun. He saves Parker in the end, but I think it dealt with Longbough trying to toughen up parker after he goes soft.

Last night I noticed this for the first time. Earlier in the movie when Dr. Painter arrives at the gas station, Longbaugh checks his bag, before they go to the van. Then at the van, Parker sees Painter go for the gun in the bag and smacks him on the head. It can't just be a mistake, I'm positive Longbaugh spotted the gun in the bag in the scene before, so why didn't he remove it?

Why does Longbaugh deliberately set up the chance that Parker would get shot, twice? Is it just to keep him on his toes? or to show that these two aren't as close as we think?

Longbaugh vs. Sarno:
After Sarno and Longbaugh have coffee, they exit the cafe and have a small discussion to see if he can bring Longbaugh back to get a fast million. When he does this, Sarno holds out his wallet and shows something to Longbaugh. We can't see it because of the position of the camera, but I'm wondering what it was he showed to Longbaugh. I don't think it would be an I.D. or business card, because it's not an I.D. or business card kind of position. could it be, just part of Caan's acting?

Wandering Francesca:
In the second act during the scenes in the house, with some creative camera work we see Francesca wandering in the background during some important conversations. I wondering why Chris did this, was it to make her seem more involved? Though she overhears a lot of conversations, she doesn't see to do anything to capitalize on it.

and finally just some observations I thought were good:

The end scene of the opening (the parking lot fight), is excellent foreshadowing to the end of the gunfight at the end of the movie (both of them lying on the ground in pain). I think it also does well for characterization to display the type of people Parker and Longbaugh were: troublemakers and miscreants, who know the outcome of their actions, but still do it anyways.

At the gas station, when Dr. Painter is in the bathroom patching himself up. Parker and Longbaugh are at the doorway listening and preventing anyone from entering. Then an unassuming guy shows up to use the bathroom and pause for a minutes. Parker then snaps his fingers and say, "Use the bushes, man." I missed that the first couple of times and laughed out loud this time.

any insight and opinions would be grateful,
mike

reply

My answers tend to gravitate towards the structure of story-telling, so they will be a little different.

"Longbaugh vs. Parker:

"Twice in the movie I notice this (well, this time I noticed it twice); that Longbaugh sets up a situation to kill Parker, by chance. The obvious scene was after the hearts game, when Longbaugh says he forgot his jacket in the room, knowing full that Robin had the shotgun. He saves Parker in the end, but I think it dealt with Longbough trying to toughen up parker after he goes soft.

"Last night I noticed this for the first time. Earlier in the movie when Dr. Painter arrives at the gas station, Longbaugh checks his bag, before they go to the van. Then at the van, Parker sees Painter go for the gun in the bag and smacks him on the head. It can't just be a mistake, I'm positive Longbaugh spotted the gun in the bag in the scene before, so why didn't he remove it?

"Why does Longbaugh deliberately set up the chance that Parker would get shot, twice? Is it just to keep him on his toes? or to show that these two aren't as close as we think?"

All these characters represent something more than themselves; all films do this, use a vague sort of symbolism. As representations, we then ask, "What do these characters represent?"

McQuarrie says this film is an allegory on the film-making process; he clearly outlines it during the entertaining commentary, so I won't bore you with it. Here's a different take. Remember PULP FICTION, where Sam Jackson makes the declaration, "I am the tyranny of evil men?" Kinda the same thing here: del Toro's character represents the hardened criminal, about a midpoint between relative newbie Phillippe and crusty old bastid Caan. Just as WAY OF THE GUN is a tough guy film of the old school, this triumvirate represents the "honorable" romanticized version of outlaws.

Throughout the film, we experience the dyanmic between del Toro's jaded cynicism (setting up a character arc that concludes inside the birthing room) and Phillippe's naivete. This creates drama, which is entertaining to watch.

Good screenplays, such as this one, will not make symbolic representations obvious -- after all, this a movie not an Aesop's fable. Further, good screenplays will make questions rise in your head, which is a testament to how successfully you were swept away by this film.

It's a great one.

"Longbaugh vs. Sarno:

"After Sarno and Longbaugh have coffee, they exit the cafe and have a small discussion to see if he can bring Longbaugh back to get a fast million. When he does this, Sarno holds out his wallet and shows something to Longbaugh. We can't see it because of the position of the camera, but I'm wondering what it was he showed to Longbaugh. I don't think it would be an I.D. or business card, because it's not an I.D. or business card kind of position. could it be, just part of Caan's acting?"

It's a note from Jimmy Hoffa that says, "Give this man whatever he wants." The easiest conclusion is it's a photo that provides definitive proof that Caan is Juliette Lewis' father (who is ironically watched over in the film by Abner, played by her actual father Geoffery Lewis).

The thing most people overlook about this scene is this is the only place Joe is different from how he is in the rest of the film. After talking to del Toro at the dive bar, getting a sense of the man and ultimately liking him, he puts his own security on the line by revealing something of himself that could potentially harm him later.

It's like saying, "Hey, you're a good guy, and I'm a good guy -- at least that's what we're saying to each other. I'm asking you, give this one up and I'll see if I can't cut you some kind of deal."

Of course, del Toro, by this time, had been a bag man long enough to know you can't risk anything to chance -- his character was all about self-preservation.

"Wandering Francesca:

"In the second act during the scenes in the house, with some creative camera work we see Francesca wandering in the background during some important conversations. I wondering why Chris did this, was it to make her seem more involved? Though she overhears a lot of conversations, she doesn't see to do anything to capitalize on it."

Yeah, that's more of an homage to the British New Wave of the 60s. She's meant to be more of an impression or threat than an actual person. She's the cast-equivalent to eerie, disquieting music.

"At the gas station, when Dr. Painter is in the bathroom patching himself up. Parker and Longbaugh are at the doorway listening and preventing anyone from entering. Then an unassuming guy shows up to use the bathroom and pause for a minutes. Parker then snaps his fingers and say, "Use the bushes, man." I missed that the first couple of times and laughed out loud this time."

That's another McQuarrie brother. One was a SEAL, this one a masseur.

reply

I like the whole Francesca thing; she definitely knows everything that goes on in that house and probably influences most of it through her husband - often without him being aware of it and maybe to the point of being "in charge". For example, I think it's pretty likely she's the real reason Obecks and Jeffers are kept on board after the kidnapping. Of course, plans that take shape that are in keeping with her schemes (Obecks & Jeffers plan for the money and Robyn) are permitted to move forward without interference.

reply

You know, Selish70, that you responded to a thread from 2006, don't you? And you wanna know why? Because it's one of the best threads on this site for one of the most interesting movies. I think this is the film that got me hooked on Ryan Phillippe...not any of the pretty boy stuff. He's an interesting actor who makes interesting choices. Benicio del Toro (besides having a kick ass name) was great in this movie but seems to have fallen off the radar. And James Caan just drifted off in general. As for Christopher McQuarrie, I could just weep.

reply

This movie should be canonized, not forgotten. It's one of the most thought-provoking and realistic action films I have ever seen. Everyone is great in it, and Christopher McQuarrie needs to make a new movie. This thread must never die!

reply

Ha, yeah, sometimes I look at how old a thread is but usually I don't. I know I like to go back and see that someone has responded to a thread I was involved in months or years ago and I assume others like to do same; it's like a little time capsule.

reply

There's been a lot of praising of this thread, and I don't think that's without reason. Hell, I even made a thread about it: http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000007/nest/141638844?d

He came home and fell down an elevator shaft onto some bullets.

reply

[deleted]

I just finished the movie,
for the first time.

And wow!
Missed so much, and got it all wrong.

I didn't get why Longbaugh made Parker go back for his jacket; or why he didn't take out the doc's gun. When they heard the cops I thought they just left, and was surprised when they came back with a sniper rifle, shooter/spotter style!

Annnnd I thought Sarno is Robin's real lover... Because it was never clear thru the movie who was the real father and when Sarno walked into the birth room, I saw Robin's mouth murmured "I love you" (yeah he's a bit too old for her but thought hell it's a movie and they're dirty bad guys)

What I like is the realistic actions. They reload their pistols (IMO a small mag size really is a big limitation on pistols, lots of other action movies don't show it), the way they fight indoors like open the door and move in keeping the gun steady and sweep along etc. A bit too pro for two small timers though?

Anyways thanks a bunch for the guys posted in this thread and back to it again!

Edit: And why was Chidduck saying it was a "conflict of interest" for Sarno in that room? Does Chidduck know that the child is Sarno's? The way I understand it, Sarno has to protect Chidduck's money, as well as his child, but the two can't be protected at the same time. But why are the two bodyguards confused about it then..

reply

Robin is Sarno's daughter. Remember when Sarno is talking to Longbaugh and he says his daughter is putting something together for his retirement? The million dollar pay off for the baby is the plan. THAT's the "conflict of interest". Sarno set the whole baby thing up, at Robin's request.

So, when Sarno, Robin and the baby, along with the Doc take off in the end with the money, do you think they just keep going? He's a bag man. You can't trust a bag man.

"I'd never ask you to trust me. It's the cry of a guilty soul."

reply


Tou are intuitive,observant and intelligent my man TRev.

reply

Bump

You know how you get to Carnegie Hall don't ya? Practice. ---Lt. Aldo Raine

reply

In the end Francesca Chidduck is pregnant.Who is the father Hale Chidduck or Jeffers?

reply

Awesome thread is awesome.

Must bump.

As far as the million dollar bill theory goes, does it bother anybody that 5 minutes of internet searching did not yield anything resembling evidence that such a thing actually exists? A whole bunch of references to fake $1,000,000 bills. Zero references to real $1,000,000 bills.

Even if they did exist my money is still on the photo of Robin, because if there were million dollar bills out there, Joe Sarno would not be walking around with one in his wallet. It would be in some airtight vault somewhere. Not to mention the fact that Joe was offering to take him to get a million dollars and just forget the whole kidnapping. If he had a million dollars in his wallet and Longbaugh was willing to settle for that, Longbaugh would have just shot him dead and taken it right there.

As far as Baltimore goes, I think Painter was delivering babies there, made a mistake, lost the baby and/or mother, and started doing abortions instead. I think that is what the "Abortions are more certain than..." line is about. I think the end of that sentence is "delivering babies." A birth is potentially dangerous for the baby and the mother. Abortion is far less dangerous for the mother.

It also addresses a line by the Dr. about "fixing mistakes instead of making mistakes." The mistake he made cost a baby and/or mother their lives.



"What the f-ck is the internet?" -Jay, Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back

reply

If I may be allowed to add my comment to this epic thread,

I assumed the "Baltimore" incident was a dead baby situation, hence his apprehension about delivering the/his baby.

After reading the excellent posts in this thread, I'm convinced the picture in Sarno's wallet is of him and Juliette Lewis. I don't even understand the director's comment about a "million dollar bill." That's ridiculous and seemingly beneath the intelligence level of the director. As stated above, there is no such thing as a million dollar bill. Anything of this sort would be like a treasury note for a million dollars, which would be pretty useless to a couple of criminals. Obviously you couldn't spend it at your local grocery store, and if you tried to deposit it in a bank, it would be traceable.

A transcript of this thread should be included in all future packaging of the DVDs.


Open the pod bay doors, Hal

reply

Saw this movie for the first time last night. Was thoroughly impressed and immediately intrigued after only a few minutes of the dialogue. I picked up on most everything discussed here pretty early on. Character pieces are my favorite. I had assumed what was in the wallet was a picture of his daughter whom he had spoken of just a minute before showing the wallet. I've never seen the director's commentary but I'm going to go out on a limb here and say I think he was just giving you some bullish answer. A million dollar bill? That seems way too moronic for a movie of this caliber. Plus the fact that it doesn't exist kind of forces you to question its validity. McQuarrie seems like the thoughtful type and continously makes you make your own judgements on what exactly is going on throughout the entire film...I think that was his way of saying "think about it because I'm not going to tell you". But then again, I've never actually seen the commentary I'm only going off what people have said about his comment.

And for what it's worth I also thought that Baltimore was most likely a botched pregnancy which caused Dr. Painter to have a mental collapse and go on "hiatus" as Sarno put it. It is very likely as people pointed out that he soon after began performing abortions instead of delivering.

reply