It's part of the ongoing exploitation of men by keeping their sexuality aroused.
Nothing new, and very sexist against men. Very misandristic and matriarchal, and chauvinistic against men.
If men can be kept in constant state of being horny, they are very easily controlled by women and female bodies and faces. This is exploited in advertising A LOT, and has been for a long time. Nothing sells to men as much as a 'pretty face and sexy body, dressed provocatively'.
In my opinion, everything has its time and place. Porn, soft-porn, sexual provocation, etc. do not belong in a regular 'family movie'.
Porn has its own place. Sexuality has its own time and place. It's not a 'regular movie'.
But they keep shoving it in, to exploit men and men's hormones and sexuality (men's achilles' heel and weak point), and abuse the fact that men don't ever get enough sex (while women pretty much always do).
The world's oldest job has always been exploiting the fact that women get so much sex they can sell the surplus, and men don't get enough, so they have to resort to paying for it.
It's brutal, it's cruel, it's cold, and it's exploitation.
But sadly enough, when the victim has a penís instead of a vagína, most people don't seem to care or sympathise. We truly live in a feminazi matriarchy.
And this movie is proof of it.
Also, anyone that watches this movie only because of that scene, certainly doesn't know how to use the internet (free porn is easy to get/watch), and should be pitied, as that someone is a pityful creature indeed.
reply
share