I don't understand why he was playing a different character in this film. It would've been better if he was playing Peter Watts (without getting killed off of course).
I never understood why they cast him at all. He already had a prolific role in the X-Files universe, and had played another character in a Season 2 episode. Maybe he is really good friends with Chris Carter.
He played 5 different roles in the same continuity (2 "X-Files" eps, the first movie, "Millennium" and "Harsh Realm") and he's not the only actor who was re-cast in new roles.
If they had some sort of nonsense rule against casting a good actor because he appeared in a single episode years prior we would be missing out on awesome casting choices. Can you imagine them passing on Nicholas Lea for the role of Alex Krycek because Lea had alreayd appeared in "Genderbender" in season 1?
The moral of the story? Don't let it bother you. Instead of giving yourself a headache over the idea of 5 characters looking physically identical in a work of fiction just realize that these are works of fiction and the people who made said works of fiction kept casting Terry O'Quinn because they thought he was awesome. Accept it and move on.
For me, the main problem with O'Quinn cast as Michaud in the movie is that Michaud behaves strangely i.e. no sense of self-preservation. This behaviour raises a bunch of questions, the main one being 'Why did Peter Watts just blow himself up!?' If O'quinn had been cast as an entirely different character, in a different line of work for example, instead of a Fed, with a different look, then perhaps it would have worked. But Michaud was just way too much like Peter Watts in role and appearance.
Consider that the X-files was so full of twists, hints, mysteries and enigmas, such a move was going to get people going.
I don't think even JJ Abrahams would pull a stunt like that. Imagine him casting O'Quinn as an office worker getting eaten by the Cloverfield monster. Would be funny, and could work seeing as Cloverfield and Lost don't exist in the same continuum, or do they?
well thats pretty much what O'Quinn looked like in everything he did around that time. check out anything he did during the 90s and its always that same balding look with the tiny mustache.
i remember when Lost started how weird it seemed to see him without a mustache and barely any hair. of course now his Lost role is so engrained into my brain that he looks weird when i see older shows or movies he's done. lol
I second that, GG_Pan. He was great in that role. That's where I first took notice of him and always harken back to that when I see him in something else. All you Terry O'Quinn fans need to check it out.
burmesterboys, I thought his behavior was pretty well explained. Dying wasn't really part of the plan. He had been mislead by his patriotism into taking part, and his job was really to lead a wild goose chase at the other building while the actual target was blown. When Mulder searched the other building on his hunch he was endangering the plan, and when the bomb was found he sort of forced Michaud to go down with the bomb to ensure nobody disarmed it and ruined the whole thing.
The part I don't understand is why go through all of that trouble to dispose of a few bodies? Every time they had an alien, hybrid, or just a body that needed to be disposed of, they didn't blow up an entire building. And the explosion clearly didn't destroy the bodies. Now there was a pretty much perfect alien hybrid body just laying in a Dallas morgue for Mulder and Scully to find. As far as coverups go, it didn't work at all. It actually provided the evidence Mulder and Scully needed to become involved.
"IF THE DEVIL HAD A NAME, IT WOULD BE CHUCK FINLEY!!"
I guess Millenium could have ended for that. Frank probably would warn about the explosion or see that it didn't help at all :). However I think Armin just would have order a hit for Frank and maybe that cool Judge-charcter would have done it?
Anyway.. Good movie still today (saw it in the morning). I actually didn't remember the year and thought it had to be after movie changing 9/11 and in that way be a bit more today. It was a whole different story after I checked the facts. I think it's not conspiracy that they post film year to this site? Or is it? Maybe we need Samantha Walker's posse to sort it out. Maybe there are Jack-related clues somewhere?
Second X-Files film was a huge disappointment. I don't know if X-Files get the attention as before but maybe they should try to show that they still have something else than those standard CIA-IS-EVIL plots. Maybe Mossad for a change or or.. Supo. I guess Finnish Security Intelligence Service could bring some new ideas to Hollywood and forget at least one or two remakes.
When I watched the original broadcast in 2002, I first thought (and thought it for years) that Darius Michaud was in fact the supersoldier we saw on FTF. It seemed logical to me.
That would clearly explain why he accepted to be killed by the explosion in the building : because he was in fact invincible, or he was told that he would be turned into a supersoldier. Then years later, I found out that everybody said it was different character. When I watched FTF in 1998, I thought it was the same character as in Aubrey.
I run into people I worked with a few years before and don't remember them. By comparison my life is rather mundane. If I was flying all over the UK week after week, let alone the US, I'd likely forget my closest friends!! I think he's the same super soldier all the way through playing different roles. I've met people who are so similar in different parts of the country if I didn't know better then I would think that they were the same person.
And after all I think a lot of the x files was planned years in advance.