MovieChat Forums > Titanic (1997) Discussion > Rose’s pussy

Rose’s pussy

posted 3 years ago by telmarine (426)
68 replies | jump to latest

So we are looking at the erotic scene where Jack is drawing Rose after she strips down and lies on the couch. She’s fully in the nude, or almost, to us viewing the film. What’s up with filmmakers always angling the camera to expose her breasts but not everything? This isn’t just for Titanic, but for other movies. Sure, you’ll see men in films stripped down to their dicks here and there but show a woman’s pussy and people people get bent out of shape? Or, at least, that’s the impression I got.

[–] liscarkat (19031) 2 years ago

In 1912, she would've had a full-on jungle of pubes down there, completely hiding everything.

[–] VanHellion (669) 2 years ago

In "Titanic" you can see her rather pronounced ginger bush covering up her muff. It's like, one frame but - yes, in 1912 there was no such trimming of the pussy.

[–] [deleted] a year ago

I love that depiction of "jungle". LOL. Makes me miss 70s porn.

[–] Burgershmurger (1426) 9 months ago

So a Brazilian wasn't a thing back then?

[–] Jes' Sayin' (6466) 2 years ago

What is your real name? I wanna send this post to your mother.

[–] Chester (223) 2 years ago

Why?

Whose mom would want to read that?

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

My perception is also that it's just the opposite; full-frontal tends to be women not men. And really, there's not as much to see on a woman!

[–] TandyMan (11214) 2 years ago

she woulda had one of them scary bushes so big it was like panties made of pubic hair. nobody needs to see that.

[–] liscarkat (19031) 8 months ago

After reading that, I'm off masturbation for at least a week. Yikes!

[–] telmarine (426) 5 months ago

Yea well those were the cultural norms back then. In fact, it would probably look awkward to them seeing a shaved little-girl pussy that we are so used to nowadays.

[–] Melton (5038) 4 months ago

Back in the day women were giant balls of public hair with a human hidden somewhere inside, rolling down the street etc

[–] roreyking (628) 2 years ago

I can't believe there's an entire thread devoted to this topic. Howling laughing!

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

There is a deleted scene where she inserts a huge and hollow transparant glass dildo in both het holes below and the camera zooms In. I saw no polyps or lesions so I believe Kate was healthy during the scene.

What the FUCK is wrong with you for needing to see labia in a mainstream movie?

[–] ADBruno1985 (3547) 2 years ago

It's almost as if they're different body parts. They're very different. The following are admittedly generalities. But you find more women for the right to go publicly topless than you do women fighting for the right to go entirely nude in public. Understandable. I'm a guy, but more private about my junk than my chest. That said, guys are also generally less shy about nudity. That said, I do find it ridiculous to compare boobs to dicks to begin with

[–] telmarine (426) a year ago

Guys are generally less shy about their junk unless have size inferiority complex. But Rose obviously wasn’t shy. It’s almost like the cameramen were the ones that were.

[–] ADBruno1985 (3547) a year ago

Yeah but Rose not being shy with Jack is entirely different from Kate Winslet not being shy with the world. She has done many nude scenes, but you can show something a million times and still reserve the right not to if you don't feel like it.

[–] jk90us (7769) a year ago

Agreed in other films but they didn’t want an R rating for this one. I’m surprised — and delighted — they allowed her boobs.