After watching it 5 or 6 times I still don't think she was that great or fantastic. She wasn't horrible. But I didn't think she did anything amazing in it. I personally think it should've gone to Gloria Stuart in Titanic. This seems like the stupid old we're sorry we snubbed you Oscar. Like Jack Palance winning for City Slickers or Tommy Lee Jones winning for the Fugitive. Of course most people already know Gloria Stuart was the best performance that year.
When the Story Lady tells us about the naughty boy who blew up his goldfish.
I agree. It's ironic that Basinger won, when she probably gave the least impressive performance of the main cast. But she was essentially the sole female character of importance, so there was no competition against her in the same film. I think the males might have cancelled each other out, because you had Crowe, Pearce, Spacey, and Cromwell all standing out, and even David Straithairn and Danny DeVito in minor entertaining roles. Too much macho! Not enough awards! Crowe and Pearce were the leads, but they were essentially newcomers and the Best Actor category was filled with veterans (and Matt Damon!), but not a single Supporting Actor nod among Spacey, Cromwell, Straithairn, or DeVito?
I strongly disagree. He should've won for JFK. He wasn't worthy of an Oscar at all for the Fugitive in my opinion. To me Tommy Lee Jones in the Fugitive is no different than Arnold Schwarzenegger in any of his movies. Not that I hate watching him in the movie but it is defiantly not his best performance.
When the Story Lady tells us about the naughty boy who blew up his goldfish.
I strongly disagree. He should've won for JFK. He wasn't worthy of an Oscar at all for the Fugitive in my opinion. To me Tommy Lee Jones in the Fugitive is no different than Arnold Schwarzenegger in any of his movies. Not that I hate watching him in the movie but it is defiantly not his best performance.
Completely agreed.
TLJ is a very good actor but imho his win over the likes of Fiennes, DiCaprio, and Postlewhaite appalss me
reply share
She did great, but I don't see anything exceptional about her performance. This movie deserved oscars in other nominations. But it was lucky enough to come out the same year with THAT movie.
I think there’s maybe one movie I believe Basinger in: 8 Mile. Not because she’s any good in it, but she fits the level of talent in the movie as a whole and works for its melodramatic story. Everything else, including movies I love such as Batman and The Door in the Floor, she sticks out like a sore thumb. And it’s just as painful as a sore thumb to watch her in anything. I hate to say it, but she’s a star because of her looks and to that she’s just so stunning that she’s been able to remain in such a position. She never would have even come close to an Oscar, let alone won it, had her year not been so weak that her competition included Gloria Stuart in Titanic. Still, she was somehow celebrated by plenty of critics for L.A Confidential. The whole time I felt like Alyson Hannigan in My Stepmother is an Alien, wondering why nobody else saw that this woman is a fraud.
<< I hate to say it, but Kim Basinger’s a star because of her looks...she’s just so stunning that she’s been able to remain in such a position >>
It's interesting that the exact same thing could have been said about Gloria Stuart: she only became famous in her heyday because, like Basinger, she was a perfect looking blonde. There are no remarkable film titles on Stuart's resume...aside from some horror films like THE INVISIBLE MAN that have become cult classics.
I think she won the Oscar partly due to the Boxing Helena producers suing her for quitting the film. A lot of the actors in the actors branch can relate to being fucked over by producers. Plus they needed to give LAC something considering it was going to lose in the other categories. She really did nothing special in the film other than look like Veronica Lake somewhat. Cusack was in a comedy which hardly get rewarded. Moore in a film about the porn industry which the Oscar voters didn’t want to endorse. Driver was brand new up against veteran actresses. And Stuart was unremarkable I think in Titanic. Stuart actually tied with Basinger at the SAG awards.
I wasn't really overwhelmed biy Kim Basingers performance. As you pointed out, UltronDoom86, she was okay, but nothing spechial. It war more her character (Lynn) than the person which caught your eye and atention.
BTW, for an escort "girl" I found her to old. Don't get me wrong now, she looks great and in the movie she is a brilliant looking end 3-. But a professional who makes his money with renting prostitutes, would't he have chosen rather a 20-year-old than a nearly 40-year-old?
English is not my first language. Any corrections are welcome.
Considering the entire objective of this is to get look-a-likes, and that Veronica Lake was about 31/32 by the time the movie took place, he should have gotten somewhere in their early 30s.
Oscars are so rarely about the performance. Yeah, some are "undeniable." Ironic example: George C. Scott won his Oscar as Patton in the first five minutes of the movie, hands down. But...he refused the Oscar.
And as Oscar winner Jack Palance said: "The performance doesn't win. The CHARACTER wins." You betcha. Patton. Forrest Gump. Rooster Cogburn. Palance in "City Slickers"(but NOT in Tango and Cash.) Erin Brockovich.
But more often than not, the Oscar is about "something else." The movie it is in. The competition that year. If the winner is "owed." Etc.
LA Confidential is a great movie. And if it had been nominated in another year, it might have won Best Picture. But it was the year of Titanic, so...no.
LA Confidential had a large group of great male performances. The three co-leads: Spacey, Crowe, Pearce. The supporting men: Cromwell, DeVito, Straithern.
As it turned out, there were too MANY great male performances, they seem to have cancelled each other out in the balloting. And who was the male lead? Spacey? Crowe? Pearce? Who should have been the Best Actor Nominee?
Evidently Warner Brothers didn't promote any one of them too much.
But there was Kim Basinger out there all by her lonesome as the female character of consequence.
It seems that she was nominated -- and WON -- to represent all those men, and the movie.
But she was good enough on her own terms. There was some dues-paying. She'd been "the pretty girl" going back to TV days and a Bond girl in Never Say Never Again. She was "the girl" in a blockbuster: Batman (and that gave her a name.) Those were dues paid.
Basinger played a hooker who had wanted to be an actress("We get to act a little" as hookers, she notes.) She played a hooker who took on a lot of powerful men. She played a hooker who could actually fall in love with a man(Bud White.) And who could retire. And was a bit too old for her profession anymore. And who looked a little bit like Veronica Lake.
Basinger was good enough to "front" for LA Confidential. It was bittersweet that she won right at the beginning of the Oscar broadcast; folks thought that maybe LA Confidential would "pile on" the awards that night. But Titanic was in the way. (As Good As it Gets cleaned up in the acting categories where no LA Confidential players were.) At least LA Confidential won was possibly the most meaningful award it could win: Best Adapted Screenplay. It was a HELL of an adaptation. Lemmon and Matthau gave the award and were praised by writer-director Curtis Hanson as "Billy Wilder actors" -- for Wilder, too, was a great writer-director.
But other than Best Adapted Screenplay, all LAC got was Best Supporting Actress...and that's why all these years later we still remember Kim Basinger in the role.
She represents the movie...and the men.
PS. Though it was a sure bet that Gloria Stuart would never get another shot at Oscar...it was probably Kim's last chance, too.