I purposfully read the book before watching the movie. Personally I feel the movie ending was a bit of a let down compared to the book. I was really impressed with how closely Robert Redford stuck to the book up until the point that Annie's husband Robert visits the ranch.
I was initially disappointed with the ending especially since Robert gave Annie the chance to rethink their marriage. I thought, "Well hey, Redford left out Grace finding out about Annie and Tom, so maybe Tom doesn't have to die and Annie gets Tom!"
But that Annie just left after asking Tom for one last ride, I was like, "Come on! Not cool!" I couldn't figure out why this ending. I know the movie was already running a little long (although I didn't mind), but I though perhaps Redford wanted to maintain what he could of Annie and Tom's dignity. They had a little fun with the stolen kiss, but the movie would have probably raised much more controversy if it had stuck with the book with Annie and Tom having a weekend getaway full of passionate love-making, Annie refusing to leave Tom, Grace finding out and running away, Tom getting killed to save Grace, and Annie has Tom's baby. I think people who had not read the book would have had a much bigger issue with that than the simple ending that Redford gave the film. Also, trying to add the additional plot could have easily added possibly another 30-60 minutes to the film.
Sooo... after thinking about it, I think Redford made the right choice with the film ending, but I much prefer the book as sad of a turnout it is. At least Tom doesn't die in the movie.
reply
share