MovieChat Forums > Sydney (1997) Discussion > Horrible movie?

Horrible movie?

posted 17 years ago by mackharder
21 replies | jump to latest

Is there anyone out there, besides me, that thought this movie was terrible and boring? It was so predictable and had a WEAK PLOT (if not NO plot). Philip Baker Hall was so boring and monotone and you knew he would go back and kill Samuel L. They should have picked someone who can actually display emotion. I kept thinking about his Librarian Police role on Seinfeld. This movie shows you nothing new and Philip Seymour Hoffman should have been in more than one scene, although his scene was pointless and didn't even need to be in the movie. I cannot believe this has a 7.7 rating, it is a 4 or 5 at best (I give it a 4)!

[–] utahman1971 10 years ago

Watching this now, and it is one boring movie that pretty much just goes and waste most of the movies time. I do not see how anyone could sit there and say this is a good movie. Samuel L. Jackson is the most interesting person on the movie. The rest is just boring.

I am a gore watching freak!!!

If it don't have it, it isn't worth the watch.

[–] 10 years ago

[deleted]