MovieChat Forums > Last Man Standing (1996) Discussion > Why do you think this movie bombed?

Why do you think this movie bombed?


I think its a great film one of Bruces best - so why did it flop?

reply

Because it stinks.

reply

I think people were expecting something better with the great source material, a good director, a great star and a great setting but it didn't deserve to be trashed as much as it did.

"Jai Guru Deva, Om"

reply

Simple, cause this is a film for a very limited audience. Most people just want to see things blow up, and a pair of breasts. There were neither of those things in Last Man Standing. The film is basically a rehash of Yojimbo and Fistful of Dollars but that's not to say it's a bad thing. Most films are remakes or ripoffs of something else. It's just a question of which one grips you the most.

I like Last Man Standing, it was a surreal art driven film, almost comic book like. But basically the film doesn't seem to know what it wants to be. Willis's mumbling narration gives the impression that he's rather bored when he tells the story, cause to him, being a Big city gangster, being in a ghost town with a couple of wannabe gangs was both boring and child's play for him. Only Hickey matched his skill and his presence. This feels like a nod to the old radio shows or serials of the time period depicting the prohibition era.

Then there's the brief but intense action sequences, they are few and far between but when they do arrive it's quite a ride. And last but not least, no happy ending. It's actually a depressing movie and most people feels that this equates to a bad film.

I liked the simplicity of it with the unique and surreal style, using abit of your imagination to fill in some of the scenery.

reply

It's a Western that tries to present itself as something else. If you like Westerns, then you like this movie. But Westerns have been passe for 30 years unless you totally re-think the genre like 'Unforgiven' or 'Tombstone' where you heavily invest the story with character development. But, 'stranger rides into town and takes on the gangs that run the town' was not seen as something new in Hollywood. For instance, we don't get the back-story of any of the characters except the woman, and then only slightly. That's a hallmark of classic Westerns, but not really something accepted today in movies.
Added to that, I think Warren Hill had a reputation of only presenting stylized violence, and this film was no exception to that. Hollywood, and the Hollywood Press didn't want to be seen endorsing that.
Having said all that, I personally loved the movie since I saw it in the theater when it came out. I still love the DVD. But I like violent, stylized Westerns.

reply

[deleted]

And one other thing occurs to me. Hill took a lot of heat for having re-done, yet again, what was considered a classic, 'Yojimbo'. Which was redone as a first derivative in, 'Fistful of Dollars' by Sergio Leone.
So, I think a lot of people felt that 'Last Man Standing' was in a sense, a movie that shouldn't have been done. Because there was no need to do it. Two classics, by two Hall of Fame Directors, had already told the story.
But...what I've always loved about it, in considering it as an adaptation of 'Yojimbo', is the way it parallels what was going on in the Prohibition era in the US with the Samurai period in Japan.

And therein lies a story:

On further analysis, you see that Yojimbo was really almost certainly an adaptation of Dashiell Hammett's 'Red Harvest', that Kurosawa never acknowleged. The Coen Bros on the other hand, fully acknowleged that 'Miller's Crossing' was a take on 'Red Harvest' melded to 'Glass key' also by Hammett. And 'Miller's Crossing' bears a very striking similarity to 'Last Man Standing'.
So, in an important sense, Hill's movie really brought the genre sense of the story back to it's true origins. Ironically, I think if he had called it an adaptation of 'Red Harvest', rather than crediting Kurosawa and Yojimbo, he would have gotten a lot less Bad Press. And it was the savaging by the critics that hurt 'Last Man Standing' a lot in my opinion. It made the studio less willing to promote the movie. And as a result, it had to find its following beginning with VHS rentals and continuing through DVD sales.

reply

[deleted]

I think it bombed because Bruce Willis didn't shoot enough bullets.

reply

I think its a great film one of Bruces best


exactly! , besides Die Hard series i cant think of a single film Bruce Willis did that's better than this as i just looked through all his films a few moments ago and only a few are even close to this (Die Hard series aside).

EDIT: i forgot to list 'The Jackal' (1997) as that's also pretty good. both films (Last Man Standing i give a 8/10 (The Jackal i went with a 7/10) as each film has some nice moments in it etc)



---
My Vote History ... http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=11026826
---

reply

i love this damn movie...every time i see it i wanna buy 20 mags, grab my 1911s n go shoot up the range...

-I'm The Police Chief, I Know Everything-

reply

The Kid. Dead Suits Her. The new robot men movie. All really good movies. But Twelve Monkeys is the best.

reply

Maybe it bombed cause of the unrealsitc details like a colt 1911 have a 20 bullets clip and no need to be reloaded? this could be the lamest "gun movie" ever made...but still its a decent action flick.

~If the realistic details fails, the movie fails~

reply