After the rape scene...

Don't be stupid. Some *beep* might rape a prostitute because he thinks like you. So he'll get off scott free since it was just "an occupational hazard". *beep* That *beep* was not only sick enough to commit rape, but sick enough to rape a prostitute and then convince themselves that it wasn't as bad as if they were to rape some innocent little princess. *beep* That person thinks more sickly than the average rapists, and THEY are the ones to really be careful for. Cause they're all around us. Sick people with sick minds who find ways to cover up the sick things they do and say and mislead people into thinking they're okay. Hell, those 3 college kids probably forgot about it, carried on with their lives and became "successful folk", while good old people like sera and ben get *beep* time and again cause people think there's wrong with them. Maybe you didn't get the point of the film, and maybe you need to go watch it again, but that's kinda the main point...Ben and Sera are clearly portrayed as the "good natured" folk of all that are shown in the film. However, they're the outsiders, while the rest of the characters are selfish and extremely self-righteous. So, which personality is really the sick one?

Back to the point of the thread; don't be stupid. Rape is a crime of action. (See how it's a verb). Therefore, a subject has to do that action. Rape occurs anytime a person does rape. (See definition of rape from the post a couple previous to this). Whether the action is to a prostitute, a 5 year old girl, a daughter, a mother, a man, a boy, a giraffe, a pie, or some pretentious IMDB critic, it IS rape. (You are now proving how pretentious you are by thinking, "hell this guy's being pretentious". Again, don't be stupid. That was the only seemingly pretentious thing I've said.

Rape begins in the mind of a being. That being has a thought, that thought is transmitted by neurons, that impulse is felt then acted upon. If the impulse is strong enough, then the person does the action. For example, when I decide to type a message on IMDB, a strong enough impulse is felt for my to move my fingers in order to pursue that objective. When I want to talk, my thought is transformed (by will) into words which are then sent as an impulse (by will) to be spoken. How loud I speak is also willful. Do you see a pattern?

WILL! Get it? The existence of the impulse as well as intensity is characterized by the subjects WILL. I'm sure a lot of people have fantasized about rape. I'm sure a lot of people see a hot chick walking along the sidewalk and think, hell I'd like to *beep* her. If only I could do it with no reprocussions!. Then that person thinks about how it's wrong. Legally, wrong!. Morally, wrong! yes, of course, that can't be right, I'm not thinking about how they would feel. etc etc...lots of reasons.

But

The person who acts on that impulse is sick. He WILLFULLY sends an intense enough impulse from his brain for his body to act in the appropriate manner. What's the appropriate manner? No, it's not the manner that the law prescribes. Nor, is it the manner that his mom prescribed. The appropriate manner of a person is exactly that, It's his individually designed concept. In this case, that manner is to commit rape. People thinking about doing this act are sick. People who do it are even sicker. But it's not because of what he does, it's because of HOW. And I don't mean how like how he physically does it, but HOW he is THINKING.

I'm shocked someone would think something so inhumane as "prostitutes being raped shouldn't be weighted as significantly since, for them, it's simply an occupational hazard". Don't be retarded. Rape is not an occupational hazard, you twat. When was the last time a nail resisted a hammer, flew up in the air and stabbed a carpenter in the head, or a building DECIDED (as if consciously) to collapse and let 1000 businessmen die? Let alone would these be considered "occupational hazards" if they were possible? If I took a job as a police officer, is it not an occupational hazard for him to shoot me? Of course not. That's not *beep* logical. Why? Cause, why the *beep* would a cop kill another cop, just like that. That's exactly the scenerio with the rape of a prostitute. It is wrong from a cop to kill another cop on the job. It is wrong for a person to kill a prostitute on the job. If it is illogical to consider the former an occupational hazard, it is similarly illogical to consider the latter. See how illogical your idea was? It's as if you are saying that we should expect people to rape their prostitutes. As if they have a *beep* right to do it. It's not part of the job, you idiot. And, if you haven't figured out what I'm saying, or can't bend your head around it, it's is an action that one person commits to another. The crime is in the action of the person committing it.

Sorry for the long post, but I'm drunk, and pissed off someone would think like you and have the nerve to defend it. I hope you don't try defending this. You're *beep* wrong. And if you don't think you're wrong, know that everyone else here thinks you are and that you're just as bad as that college kid raping sera.

I'm gonna leave you with some Dead Prez lyrics: I'm not a hunter but i am told,
that, uh, in places like in the arctic,
where indiginous people sometimes might, might, hunt a wolf,
they'll take a double edged blade,
and they'll put blood on the blade,
and they'll melt the ice and stick the handle in the ice,
so that only the blade is protruding,
and that a wolf will smell the blood and wants to eat,
and it will come and lick the blade trying to eat,
and what happens is when the wolf licks the blade,
of course, he cuts his tongue, and he bleeds,
and he thinks he's really having a good thing,
and he drinks and he licks and he licks,
and of course he is drinking his own blood and he kills himself,
thats what the Imperialists did with us with crack cocaine,
you have these young brothers out there who think they are getting something
they gonna make a living with,
they is getting something they can buy a car,
like the white people have cars, why can't i have a car?
they getting something they can get a piece of gold,
white people have gold, why can't i have gold?
they getting something to get a house,
white people have a house, why can't i have a house?
and they actually think that theres something thats bringing resources to them,
but they're killing themsleves just like the wolf was licking the blade,
and they're slowly dying without knowing it.
thats whats happening to the community, you with me on that?
thats exactly, precisely what happens to the community,
and instead of blaming the hunter who put the damn handle and blade in the ice
for the wolf,
that what happens is the wolf gets the blame, gets the blame for trying to live,
thats what happens in our community,
you don't blame the person, the victim,
you blame the oppressor, Imperialism, white power is the enemy,
was the enemy when it first came to Africa,
and snatched up the first African brothers here against our will,
isss the enemy today,
and thats the thing that we have to understand.


The context is different but the content is similar. Do you get it? It is the *beep* up part of the general society to blame the victims instead of the oppressors. Why immediately blame the hooker or the alcoholic? If you do, it's really too bad, they're probably better people than you are.

Cobram is obviously a 19 year old kid (male) with no understanding of the word rape.