MovieChat Forums > Crimson Tide (1995) Discussion > The racial subtext, was it necessary?

The racial subtext, was it necessary?



I like this movie a lot and it has stood the test of time well but what almost ruins the entire film was near the end when they both sit down facing each other at the com and Hackman brings up the horse discussion from earlier. Implying that the horses are the best because they are white, it just felt like it was a deciding factor in his hostility towards Washington's character, and therefor undermined his entire standing as Captain.


Don't be afraid to dream a little bigger darling...

reply

I tend to think that the racial subtext of this movie was entirely necessary, given the ethnic backgrounds of the two lead actors. The movie is a work of fiction, but it’s grounded in real life situations. And in real life, whether anyone wants to admit it or not, race matters. For the movie not to give a nod to this reality would have been unrealistic.

That said, I don’t believe that Captain Ramsey was a racist. I believe that the comment was made to push Commander Hunter’s buttons. As shown earlier in the movie Ramsey believes that the crew should perform as well under stress as they do under relaxed circumstances. The comment about the horses was a racial jab to see if it would shake-up Hunter. I think by that point in the movie, Ramsey was willing to consider that he might have been wrong, and if he was wrong, then Hunter had been correct to remove him from command. But, if Hunter, under extreme stress, had lost his resolve in the face of racism then, in Ramsey’s mind, Hunter would then not have been fit to take over command.

Crimson Tide is one of my favorite movies. I own a copy, and every time it comes on TV, despite owning a copy and having seen it so many times, I sit down and watch. I love how the movie is enjoyable on several levels: how the Navy and being a sub commander is all that Ramsey has, and he feels duty bound to complete his mission, even if it could possibly ignite a world war; how Hunter feels that a nuclear war would be a global holocaust, and in the back of his mind he must be thinking about his family who would suffer and die in that holocaust if the Alabama wrongly launches it’s missiles; the conflict of CoB and Westergaurd for doing what they feel is right even if it means that CoB must take sides against Ramsey, who like him is old Navy, and Westergaurd must take sides Hunter, who, like him, is a black naval officer; and the contrast between ’Weps’, the weapons officer who resists unleashing the destructive power under his control and Dougherty, the supply officer who seems almost giddy about the prospect of igniting a nuclear war.

This is a great movie.

reply

Yes, it was ncessary.

___
sPider the troll -> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v333/JediNg/SpiderLOL.jpg

reply

I don't think their discussion about horses was about racism, although I can see it's easy to read that into the discussion.

I think it was about who is right and wrong, a theme which these characters go about the entire movie - and in the end it didn't turn out so simple.

reply

Considering several white actors were originally offered the role before Denzel, I doubt they did a rewrite to make it more racial.

reply

Actually I think the scene was one of Quenti's Tarentino's(?) rewrites. I remember there was some controversy about it at the time.

reply

I completely disagree - I thought it just added to the tension and it was obvious he was doing it to just wind his adversary up and the script was written in a time when writers could still treat their audience as adults knowing they could work that out for themselves.

reply

I didn't even view that as racist and I don't even think it was intended as racist. It's only now I've seen this thread that I even picked up on the possibility.

reply

I hate movies where race is brought up. Why can't a movie involving black characters and white characters or even asian characters keep quiet about it? Why do filmmakers bring race into their movies, when it's not even relevant most of the time?

reply

Racial sensationalism. Its not necessary....but its a HUGE part of what we see and hear in film and music. IMO its only adding fuel to the fire.

reply

I have seriously cut down on the time I spend on this site because I'm so sick of the "racial/racist" posts. Am I the only one that sees Ramsey's comments for what they were? Comments about an ANIMAL THAT IS WHITE! He's talking about a *beep* horse, for God's sake.

Ramsey shouldn't have talked about them because they're white? So, he can't discuss snow, or teeth, or copy paper either? They're all white as well. How about the President's residence, the White House? That one off-limits,too? White Christmas, The White Stripes, they forbidden, too? And don't mention bleach, because it keeps your whites looking white! A double whammy!! Oh, the horrid, evil, Captain Ramsey, mentioning a horse that's white. How does he get to his KKK meetings when he's out in a submarine for months at a time?

I swear, people that see racism in everything are the ones with race issues.

reply

It never occurred to me to think of that scene racially. As the trivia page notes:

"The disagreement between Cpt. Ramsey and Lcdr. Hunter over the origin of the Lipizzaner stallions throughout the movie foreshadows and illustrates the fundamental source of friction between the two men, both insisting that their mutually exclusive version of reality is the truth."

I also saw it as a way to increase the tension, ironically by focusing on something totally off-subject during the tensest moment in the movie.

I always had a hunch that the scene was written by Quentin Taratino--discussions about arcane topics (hamburgers in Paris) during the tense build-up to confrontations is a staple of his.

reply

The whole white horses remark by Ramsay was deliberately intended to push Hunter's buttons, it was matched by the his comments about how those white horses were supposedly trained as well. Ramsay was speaking about how he himself was trained in the Navy, and he felt that Hunter had it way too easy.

Ramsay wanted to have at least one more battle under his belt, he came from a different school of military thought where the rules could be bent. He resented Hunter because he was a young man who in Ramsay's opinion at the start of his career, and who had gained his position too easily, also Ramsay knew that he was about to be put out to pasture, so he resented the younger man / stallion, who would succeed him. I found the movie to one of those edge of the seat thrillers.

... Love keeps her up when she oughta fall down... Mal

reply

It's Hollywood. Most time when black and white share the same screen Hollywood has to throw in some racial tension or joke or whatever. I blame the writers, had Tom Cruise played Denzel part they would have written it a little different.

-stay thirsty my friends

reply

[deleted]

The racial subtext was definitely there and it was most certainly necessary.

Remember that this is a Quentin Tarantino script. The whole climax of the film is another of his famous "Mexican Standoff" scenes where people point guns at each other (and in this case missiles) and questions of allegiance, friendship, orders, what you know about a person, and what you think you know about a person come in to conflict.

Also the scene seems to be similar to the infamous "Sicilian are spawned by N****" scene in True Romance. In that film Dennis Hopper isn't necessarily racist, he just wants to mess with Christopher Walken's head. Hopper knows he's as good as dead but he figures he'll push this guy’s buttons one last time, f around with his brain and accuse all his ancestors of doing something that a Sicilian would consider taboo and awful.

Ramsey's f'ing with Hunter. He's trying to unsettle him in the midst of this standoff by pushing his buttons. There are all kinds of social, age, and class differences between the two that fester throughout the film, when the pressure cooker ends up very hot by the end they are throwing all kinds of things at each other in an attempt to win.

reply

Remember that this is a Quentin Tarantino script.


Umm NO... It is not.

Tarantino was brought in to do a few touch-ups here and there. The biggest contribution being the the Silver surfer stuff.
Doing a few uncredited touch ups does not make it his script.


I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

I think you all need to watch this....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGqwh_0gUvY

reply


He was brought in to do a rewrite, what all he did, we don't know. But I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that Denzel Washington's confrontation with Tarantino on the set didn't stem from the Silver Surfer bit...and was likely over the horse stuff.

reply

The only point I was making was that this was not a "Tarantino script" as claimed by a previous poster.

Quentin Tarantino was brought in to do uncredited "punch-ups" of the dialogue. His major contribution was the comic book bickering. The character name "Russell Vossler" is a reference to Rand Vossler, with whom Tarantino used to work at a video store. See also Pulp Fiction (1994).


That does not make it his script.
The story was done by Michael Schiffer and Richard P. Henrick.
With Michael Schiffer also doing the screenplay.


As to your...
But I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that Denzel Washington's confrontation with Tarantino on the set didn't stem from the Silver Surfer bit...and was likely over the horse stuff.

I was not even talking about any argument between Denzel and Tarantino on set. And I must have missed if anyone else was.
Regardless you are wrong. The argument on set between them had nothing to do with anything related to the movie they were shooting, much less the horses, the comics or whatnot.

Denzel was upset over Tarantino's regular use of the word *beep* in many of his past films and had it out with him over it.

According to a 1995 Premiere magazine article, when Quentin Tarantino visited the set, Washington confronted him about his use of the word *beep* in his films. Tarantino got embarrassed and wanted to move the conversation to a more private area. Washington said, "No, if we're going to discuss it, let's discuss it now." Washington later said he still felt that Tarantino was "a fine artist".



EDIT: Apparently even though it is a copy and paste from imdb's own page... you cannot use the "N" word without imdb *bleep*ing it out.

Irony..

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

Race is a very complex issue in the U.S., and my guess is it will be for another 100 years.

I think the strife between Hackman and Washington's characters was only partly racial. Imho, the larger component was a gruff old guy, who had to work and sweat his way to the top resenting a younger guy, maybe half his age, who spent a year at "Haa-vaaad." A golden boy, who has had the luxury of interpretingvon Clausewitz's inner meaning.

So yes race is a factor, but its a multidimensional hate. Just like the debate about who was right, who was wrong, in the hearing after it was over. Some say both, others side with one or the other.

reply

There is little doubt in my mind that the black/white Lipizzaner business was written to indicate racism on the part of Ramsey. The lines were clunky and did not very well gell with Ramsey's previous lines. Also, when the subject was reprised at the end of the film, it made for a lame conclusion. The film would have been better without any of this. Others have suggested that this material was contributed by Quentin Tarantino and I've no reason to disbelieve it.

"I beseech ye in the bowels of Christ, think that ye may be mistaken."

reply

Others have suggested that this material was contributed by Quentin Tarantino and I've no reason to disbelieve it.


if QT contributed this, its a great piece of scriptwriting....the whole film is laced with racial tension, from the big black dude doing pushups, to the fire that killed him.....

The American ideal of Manifest Destiny and genocide, and clearly the Atomic Bomb and Horishima discussions clearly demonstrated a racial superiority even if there were black officers present.









http://myimpressionz.tk

reply

Jazz

Those were two separate actors, the one doing push ups was Tedford, the other that died was Billings.

Personally I think the discussion about the horse was more to show the opposites. Old school versus new school, trained versus educated, rural versus urban, married versus single,, black versus white. People, dont forget, they dont disagree on the color of the horse (capt ramsey admits he didnt know they were born black), they disagree on Spain versus Portugal. I think some people are looking into the racial aspect TOO deep

reply

Rubbish, Capt Ramsey clearly tries to stir him up by demonstrating the superiority of the White horse.

Hunter shoots back that they were born black....

How obvious do you want it?

The old man still wants superiority by insisting on Spain or portugal....which am sure he s wrong, coz Hunter just laughs at him.

PS. Lipizzaner were started by the Moors IN SPAIN....Ramsey insisted they were from Portugal didnt he?


http://myimpressionz.tk

reply