MovieChat Forums > True Romance (1993) Discussion > Tarantino should be ashamed.

Tarantino should be ashamed.


I know it's never popular to speak negatively about a movie on here, but my god, after watching every other one of Tarantino's films (up to Django) and loving them, this one was pitiful.

Patricia Arquette (who plays Alabama) is just about the worst actress I have ever seen in my life. How she managed to continue her acting career after this movie is beyond me.

Anyway, the script itself is pretty good, and the rest of the cast (aside from Arquette) is outstanding. But it's really very obvious that Tarantino did not direct this film himself, because there is no way he would have let it turn out this bad.

The characters seem as if they would have been really deep and complex, but it's as if Tony Scott came and stomped on all of them to flatten them out to make it more palatable for general audiences. There's no mystery behind the characters, no intrigue.

But dammit, I kept rooting for Alabama to get killed in any one of those shoot outs because then I wouldn't have to listen to Arquette's horrible voice anymore.

reply

[deleted]

I don't agree with you at all, this is one of my favorite movies.
But even if I agreed with you on the movie being bad, I don't understand how Tarantino should be ashamed.. You kind of contradict yourself.

You acknowledge that the script itself is "pretty good" and as far as I can find out, that's the only thing about this movie that he is responsible for. He was not an executive producer or even just a producer. So why should he be ashamed? Why? WHY?!

That being said, I think Tony Scott did a great job at capturing the mood and feel that goes so well with a Tarantino script.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Nothing you actually said is a reason Tatantino should be ashamed. The writing and acting in this film were outstanding all around.
I agree with you on two points:
1) that Arquette is a bad actress. However this is the best peformanace she has ever given, including the role that recently won her the Academy Award. The only scene where it was too much for me was when James Gandolfini was beating the crap out of her and she started with that laugh that made me want to cringe.
2)Tony Scott usually directed movies that had characters with little to no depth (at least the ones he is better knwon for like Top Gun, Days of Thunder, The Last Boyscout, etc) however he did a heck of a job with this one. However, I believe that, between the cast and the script, Michael Bay, Brett Ratner, and Tyler Perry could have collaborated on it and still come out ok.

"I'm sorry that the pretzel fell out.I honestly don't know how long it was in my underpants."

reply

she was horrible in this movie.
i liked her in 1 movie,stigmata.
that was the only movie i thought she was good in but this movie,she did not fit the role.

reply

This was Patricia Arquette channeling her best Melanie Griffith.

True Romance, Flirting with Disaster, Trouble Bound, Something Wild, Another Day in Paradise, Stormy Monday. Man, these girls are interchangeable.

I love 'em both to bits.

"We live in an era where pizzas show up faster than the police" (Claude Chabrol)

reply

patricia arquette plays the "girl in love" role , no more no less

she is ok but proves her mettle when confronted by james gandolfini

maybe you are right though she is the weakest point in an otherwise strongly acted movie

reply