Seriously, WTF?!


I was whole-heartedly enjoying this poignant film...up until the bizarrely gratuitous and ridiculously LONG shot of Julianne Moore's bush. I mean, was that necessary...REALLY? I couldn't sit through that scene with a straight face. It was just so...stupid. I don't GET IT! Now I'm too embarrassed to show this movie to my friends, who would otherwise be missing out on one amazing piece of dramatic art.

While I'm at it, why was Doreen walking around with her uniform zipped down below her naval? That, too, seemed unnecessary (especially considering we are to believe she's in need of a diet, and, uh, Lily Tomlin isn't exactly someone who comes to mind when I hear the word "fat"). The shot(s) of her ass worked because it was needed as fodder for an argument with her husband, but why go about your business with your shirt undone for ten minutes?

I never thought I'd see the day when I'd be B!TCHING about some lovely T&A...but it's almost like Altman was reveling in his own sexual obsession with the womanly figure, the way he had practically every one of his actresses flashing skin at seemingly random times. It's not that I blame him, but it really sticks out like a red flag in my mind when there's nudity ALL in my face and NOT for the sake of anything meaningful.

Maybe I just need to work on my prudishness, but it was just a bit too shocking at times, I guess. Did it unnerve anyone else???


myspace.com/broken_lullabye
"Don't fck with me, I guarantee you I'm crazier."

reply

I don't think the naked parts ruined it for me. Although I did feel that some scenes were obvious attempts to give a feeling of being modern and very au naturel. But I think it's just because we're so unused to seeing intimate parts on the big screen. In such a natural and casual way. Wouldn't you do the same? OK, say you're Julianne Moore's character and you don't wear any panties (she's not the first woman on the planet to do that). You spill some wine on your skirt. You have two alternatives: a) put it in the washing machine and take another skirt or some pants, or b) take off the skirt, try to wash off the stain and blow-dry it while strutting around flashing your thing. In most movies a) would probably be the "better" choice, but this movie depicts real life so subtly and still in-your-face. What life really is like. Yeah, she was mad, so beep you, husband, for taking out all your anger on me, now I can't think straight and the more you comment on me being overdressed, the more I will walk around without skirt or panties. I felt it coming when he started nagging about "Are you really gonna wear that?", so I wasn't that surprised. But it was a good scene, great interaction and dialogue.

Welcome to Costco, I love you.

reply

Think about the scene. What is Julianne talking about? Now think about her art work. What is her artwork about? Now think about her husband's reaction to her artwork. How does he react to it?

The nudity is extremely relevant.


"Rape is no laughing matter. Unless you're raping a clown."

reply

normally i can see how julianne moore's scene could be considered excessive nudity, but considering the characters' histories (that of both the husband and wife), i think it is perfectly relevent. marian had already mentioned earlier when talking with her sister that ralph was "conservative". we also know that ralph is not comfortable with marian's use of nudity in her paintings. furthermore, he has a very different opinion of art (and life) than that of his wife -- she seems to see the beauty in things while he considers them mundane and unimpressive. on top of that, he suspects her of having an affair with the artist in the past, but buries that suspician. the built-up tension comes to a head when he asks her if she is getting dressed up to impress stuart at the barbeque, therefore finally revealing his true feelings/suspicians, as well as providing an opportunity to bring up her past affair. the fact that marian is parading around without underpants during the emotional exchange not only indicates ralph's problems/jeolousy/impatiance towards his wife (he says "look, you're not even wearing panties") but, juxtoposizes marian's somewhat tragic free-spirit and open sexuality (the tragic part lying in her newly-revealed past infidelity) with ralph's discomfort and pain at seeing his wife's liberal and sexual nature get out of control.

as for doreen, i guess i would say it's because she's in her own home, because she just got back from a hard day at work, etc. the same with the brief nude frances mcdormand scene. both seemed very natural to me, and i did not find them distracting.

i think it would be a shame for people to miss out on this movie just for this reason, but if your friends are only going to be distracted by the nudity rather than contemplate what it's supposed to represent, then they are unfortunately missing out on the greater meaning of the film, and probably wouldn't enjoy it as much anyway.

"you must be odd, you two" -- tim spall, to US

reply

Exactly, Locke. Another scene they complain about is the nudity during the swimming pool sequence. It's unnecessary, they say. Why is it unnecessary? It's the moment when the guy's whole personality is revealed.

Altman is one of those most thoughtful directors out there, and it's unfair to say that he's trying to be exploitative or mean to his cast.


"Rape is no laughing matter. Unless you're raping a clown."

reply

One could argue that "Short Cuts" has a European feel to it in the sense that nudity in many European movies is a natural thing.

The Americans just have trouble coming to terms with it all.

reply

If you're referring to the scene where the cellist jumps-unclothed-into the pool then I was one of those people. I would have found it more believable if she'd jumped in wearing her workout gear but after reading your post, I realized that it gave us immediate insight into Chris Penn's character. I never looked at it that way before.

reply

Quite honestly i really didn´t see why there were so many nude semi- nude scenes in this film.
Before you start shouting about what a prude i am, I am not or ever been a prude and i am from Europe where nudity is very common in films on beaches etc.
OK, back to this film.
I guess i really didn´t get it.
There were loose ends all over the place.
I couldn´t connect with any of the characters in their way of thinking.
I didn´t like any of the characters.
I guess the clown lady was OK but the others were just annoying, jealous or selfish.
The nudity with the ginger bush was a little strange. I don´t know why that was thrown in as it looked like a lot of scenes were just ¨thrown in¨ as well as the script.
There were some big names in this and i really don´t know why.
I didn´t find it compelling to watch but did as i wanted to see if anything happened at the end that made any sense to this entire film.
It was sad yes, the little boy that was hit by the car and the suicide, but also disturbing how the fishermen liked to take photos of the naked dead girl in the river but did nothing for her.
I guess it just didn´t come across for me to like this.
I did watch it until the end.
Why did Chris Penn kill the girl? Anyone?


If it harms none, do what though wilt.

reply

I'm going to respond to your post point by point but i hope you don't take it the wrong way. a lot of times when that's done on these boards it's because someone wants to start an argument or belittle someone but that's not my intention at all. i just really love this movie and find your take on it very interesting so i feel compelled to respond and try to explain at least my feelings about it.

The nudity with the ginger bush was a little strange. I don´t know why that was thrown in as it looked like a lot of scenes were just ¨thrown in¨ as well as the script.


i think that as viewers we've been conditioned to see nudity on film within a certain context. often it's sensationalized, dressed up and put on display. people expect it to be "sexy." so ironically, it's the most natural nudity that tends to make people uncomfortable. jullianne moore and robert altman have both stated that the nudity was meant to be real, not sexy. people within their own homes, in front of their spouses, don't behave as though a camera is on them. as other posters have stated, the nudity isn't pointless, it says something about the character and her choices. personally i feel it has a lot to do with her husband's question about what women are competing for and that she is dressing up a bit for the other husband.

as for the assertion that a lot of things are just "thrown in," this is kind of the tone of all of altman's movies. he wasn't one to follow traiditional story structure or give much attention to plot. he was more interested in showing moments of genuine and telling human behaviour and with that in mind i think he succeeds in this film. he leaves a lot of loose ends because these people aren't meant to have "endings" in the traditional movie sense. we're seeing a particular moment in their life and after the film is over they'll go on living it. we as viewers are meant to wonder how their stories will play out based on their actions.

There were some big names in this and i really don´t know why.


Robert Altman was one of the most respected actors in the industry. Actors especially love him because he allowed so much freedom on the set. actors were encouraged to come up with their own ideas about their characters and improvise freely. after working in films that demanded a strict following of the script or a lot of choreographed behaviour i think a lot of actors would jump at the chance to have more of a say in what they're doing on screen.

It was sad yes, the little boy that was hit by the car and the suicide, but also disturbing how the fishermen liked to take photos of the naked dead girl in the river but did nothing for her.


this is kind of the point of carver's work and altman's take on it. it's meant to be a kaleidiscope of human behaviour which can be tragic, funny, loving and cruel. it's how different people are likely to handle the cards that life has dealt them. we're meant to be disturbed by the fisherman's indifference to human life and it's why claire reacts the way she does. just because altman doesn't wrap the story up or show any kind of justice towards the fisherman doesn't mean he's not disturbed by the behaviour. sometimes that's just how things play out.

Why did Chris Penn kill the girl? Anyone?


it has to do with his own sexual frustration, which we see in his reaction towards his wife's work and his relationship with Bill. Altman said that Robert Downey Jr's character was meant to be like Iago, meaning that he'd never commit an act of violence himself but he would certainly push another person to commit such an act. it's why he's shown talking about putting makeup on a naked girl, he recognizes penn's attitude and he's trying to get a reaction out of him.

I couldn´t connect with any of the characters in their way of thinking.
I didn´t like any of the characters.


i don't think you're expected to like or understand all of the characters, but i can see how the movie would be a chore if you didn't like any of them. personally, i find some of them charming, some tragic, and some repulsive and i appreciate altman's ability to have so many different characters interacting with each other. i think he's acheived the very difficult task of reflecting real life on screen, but i can certainly understand how you might not connect with the characters and this would make the movie very difficult to watch. i don't think that altman's work is for everybody, certainly not if you want a more traditional story arc or characters that you can root for.




reply

in a film where a child dies and three men would rather tie up a dead body and fish then immediately report it to the police, the female figure bothers you???

reply

i am from Europe

Yeah, Vatican maybe.

If you love Jesus Lizard and are 100% proud of it, copy this and make it your signature!

reply

Well there were several things that were "bizarre". Like why the hell was peter gallagher tearing *beep* up in the house? why did julianne moore walk around without any underpants on for a full 10 minutes? why did chris penn, "out of the clear *beep* blue!" decide to kill that poor girl? where in the hell did that earthquake come from, kinda sudden. why did the blonde girl kill herself? what a wacko. and then of course how in the hell did the little kid die minutes after the doctor said, he'll be fine, just need some minor surgery, 30 seconds later, boom, the kid's all of a sudden dying. huh? i'm not a doctor, but i'm unsure of whether things like that are even possible you want bizarre? there ya go. chew on that.





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFtYpLV4EPo

reply


Like why the hell was peter gallagher tearing *beep* up in the house?

Because his ex-wife is off on a weekend trip with a new man, and he's a jerk. Is that really so hard to figure out??

and then of course how in the hell did the little kid die minutes after the doctor said, he'll be fine, just need some minor surgery

Uh yeah, that's how things happen sometimes. You've never heard of someone dying when the doctors thought they would be fine? Life is unpredictable and tragic that way, sometimes.

where in the hell did that earthquake come from, kinda sudden.

Uh yeah, that's how earthquakes happen. They are unpredictable, like life in general, which I'm sure was the point.

why did julianne moore walk around without any underpants on for a full 10 minutes? why did chris penn, "out of the clear *beep* blue!" decide to kill that poor girl?

This is discussed in the rest of the thread.

You must be the change you seek in the world. -- Gandhi

reply

...why the hell post all that when it would be simpler to have just written "I'm not very bright, me?"

I used to want to change the world. Now I just want to leave the room with a little dignity.

reply

[deleted]

The nudity is an important structual part of the film. People often behave very differently in private to what they do in public, and wear personalities like clothes. Altman was showing us little glimpses of their lives - what they are really like - and the nudity reinforces this concept. We only really see what people are like in brief private moments.

reply

Modine: "YOU'RE NOT WEARING ANY PANTIES!!!!" My favorite line.


What I don't understand is how we're going to stay alive this winter.

reply

[deleted]

It's just pubic hair, get over it. Its not like you'd be showing your friends a vagina.

So you can tell your friends: watch this AMAZING movie, and don't be shocked by some partially exposed breasts and some pubic hair.

Will you friends enjoy seeing Huey Lewis' penis? because that is fully exposed. but it dont see anyone complaining or being shocked.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]