Yes back in the day (the 80s and early 90s) how the HIV/AIDS virus was transmitted was a question mark. The scene at miller's office was well scripted as you see what extremes counselor miller made to separate himself from hank's character. his apparent thought was any contact would or could result in the transmission of the hiv/aids virus. The camera angles were very specific in showing how careful washington's character was in insuring he kept his distance. It would take a casual encounter at a library, between beckett and miller, for miller to learn that a law had been violated. The specific law was the Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Beckett's law firm asserted that his termination was a the result of incompetence and not because he contracted the HIV/AIDS virus. This movie brought to light the issues the gay community faced in relation to the hiv/aids virus. There were too many questions followed by too many myths and errant thinking. I found the movie courageous in its portrayal. In the final scene you've got a close knit family dealing with the death of a beloved family member. They dismissed any negative thoughts associated with HIV/AIDS. To them Andrew was their son, brother, brother-in-law ... he was a human being who contracted an incurable disease.
reply
share