My thoughts


I finally got around to watching this one in 2024. I had heard about it for many years (who hasn’t), but for some reason, I didn’t watch until recently

The movie has innocent charm, and there are some funny moments. Emilio Estevez is good in his role . Even if I didn’t watch this movie as a child, I can still understand why a lot of people fondly associate this movie with their childhoods

Still, the movie is rife with cliques. The bare-bones plot is that a self-centered lawyer reluctantly coaches a group of ragtag kids who don’t like him. If you have any experience with movies, you can easily predict what will happen: the self-centered lawyer will learn to care about others instead of himself, and the ragtag kids will come to like him . Along the way, there is a subplot involving Emilio Estevez’s and his childhood hockey coach, which is equally predictable. His coach is a 2-dimensional cliche antagonist from start to end

6.5/10

reply

IMO it's not meant to be a cunning mindbender masterpiece, but a fun children's sports film.

It's also easy to label things predictable or cliche while stating one's experience with film....when you're experiencing said film over 30 years after it's release. It's not a wrong criticism, but it's also unfair to do so over 30 years later

reply

The cliches in this movie would’ve been cliches in 1992 too

reply

Because of Bad News Bears. Everyone knew this was Bad News Bears at the time too. Doesn't really make it cliche because one film did it. Nobody cares it's not meant to be mind-blowing.

All other films you're probably thinking of came after this

reply