But there can be no denying that the Charade remake and the Manchurian Candidate remake were just so much worse than their origin films:
Charade had been a "star vehicle" for Cary Grant and Audrey Hepburn in their peak star years. In 2002 it probably would have needed Julia Roberts and George Clooney to get much of the same star power -- and Clooney probably wasn't big enough. Tom Cruise maybe? Or Tom Hanks?
Instead, we had Mark Wahlberg in for Grant(long before Wahlberg had attained full stardom) and Thandie Newton in for Audrey Hepburn( and Newton NEVER attained stardom.)
Charade also had in support future stars Walter Matthau, James Coburn,and George Kennedy. Tim Robbins made a valiant effort at the Walter Matthau part(he even used Matthau's vocal patterns) but...no. And all the great scenes in Charade were pretty much removed and thrown out for The Truth About Charlie. The climax was no climax at all.
--
The Manchurian Candidate didn't have a star power problem. Denzel Washington was in for Frank Sinatra from the original, and The Great Meryl Streep was in for Angela Lansbury. Except as it turned out, Meryl Streep was much WORSE in her villainous mother role than Lansbury was, and Denzel was too "put together and self assured" to match Frank Sinatra's shellshocked, half-brainwashed, scared rabbit performance from the original.
But the acting wasn't the problem. The wholesale rejection of the brilliant Cold War era poltical satire and observation was gone. No longer could Communists be villains. It had to be the usual "generic evil American corporation" and one of the most unique political thrillers of all time became "just another thriller" with too many plot turns and no real POV.
Two bad remakes of two great and beloved originals. THAT's what ended Jonathan Demme's top tier career, but he went on to do lots of good things and was roundly celebrated by friends and mentees for his skill and kindness as a filmmaker and a man.
reply
share