MovieChat Forums > Men at Work (1990) Discussion > The core problem of this movie

The core problem of this movie


This movie has of course multiple problems. I can't see why anyone would even tolerate it, let alone like it, let alone want it to have a 'cult following' or sequel (are you people nuts?).

It has bad acting, slow pacing, bad musics, prolonged scenes, and the whole plot with all of its details is so ridiculous and nonsensical that it boggles the mind how this movie ever got made.

One detail in particular that I'd like to mention, is that

-- and this will be very difficult to understand for you youngsters out there, who have never used cassette tapes --

..cassette tapes can be two-sided. They can also be 90-minute ones, and they can be fast forwarded or rewinded to any position in that 90-minute duration.

And they're TWO-SIDED. There are two sides. You can put a cassette tape into a cassette player two different ways. Side A or Side B. The cassette can also contain 90 minutes of audio of any kind.

If you keep these facts in mind while watching this movie, you are bound to also feel some pain when watching how people in this movie deduce VERY quickly that they have the 'wrong tape', when it's just as possible that they have the wrong side, OR that the tape just isn't fast forwarded/rewinded to the correct spot (it could be before or after the 'important part').

They would have to listen to BOTH sides fully, and possibly the full 90 minutes, before they could actually make any judgment as to whether the tape is the correct or the wrong one.

Now, the owner of the original tape might know that the tape is fully empty before recording, and thus hearing some music instead of what he recorded, might cause him to become alarmed immediately. That's plausible.

But how does the 'suit boss' know, without listening to ALL of it, whether it's the right or the wrong tape? Does he just expect it to be in the right position, and why doesn't he AT LEAST try both sides, at least a few minutes both directions on both sides?

It makes absolutely no sense. And it's not the only thing that doesn't make any sense about this movie.

The characters are not sympathetic at all. The trashmen are obnoxious, childish pranksters and drunkards, who like to do their job badly and disturbingly to the residents, causing unnecessary noise and BOWLING (!) with the trash? What the .. how are we supposed to feel sympathetic towards them?

Also, it's cliché-ridden. Why, oh why, did we have to see the 'angry black boss chews the protagonist but gives them one more chance'-scene? How many times do we have to see this? Heck, even the movie 'Last Action Hero' made fun of this movie trope. And still, it's used seriously here. Why?

In my opinion, it's also a good idea to never use feces in a movie. It doesn't exactly elevate the movie towards sophistication, it doesn't add anything useful, meaningful or fun, and it's just disgusting to look and think about. And this kind of gag is used twice, eww.

The whole 'Weekend at Bernie's' gag was so unbelievable that I doubt anyone's suspend of disbelief can be stretched far enough to make it seem plausible.

The dialogue is corny and unnatural, and frankly, boring.

The core problem, though, is that this movie is in a coma.

It is completely void of energy. There's no life, there's no spark.

Lifeless. Listless. Snail-paced. Boring. Soulless.

There's nothing to make you keep watching and want to see more.

Every single one of the scenes (all of which are boring and slow-paced, except a couple of brief action scenes - but even they are completely non-interesting and lacking of energy) could have been done with lots of energy, making them interesting. Even with the same, awful dialogue.

There's no passion. There's no enthusiasm. There's no deeply convincing acting performances. No one seems to mean what they say for the most part. Phoning it in. Lazy. Just doing it for money.

This movie is so tired, it's almost dead. We're watching paint dry and grass grow.

Even the slightly more interesting character, the shell-shocked, angry vietnam vet, can't bring much life to the movie. It's like the director deliberately wanted every scene to be even more boring than it would otherwise have been.

I can imagine him yelling "cut!" and coming to the actors, saying, "no, no, no... I want less energy, be more tired and talk more slowly and try to keep any enthusiasm off-camera! Now, let's try it again - remember, more lackluster. More listless. Action."

Also, plots with 'MacGuffins' (the tape in this case) that everyone must chase during the movie, are just incredibly lazy. I didn't like that kind of plot in Back to the Future Part II, and I certainly don't like it here. Tape this, tape that, yawn. Might as well be a Gray's Sports Almanac.

(to be continued.. moviechat has limitations that IMDb never had - so I have to slice my posts to parts, now.. sigh.)

reply

The very idea of 'trashmen' - why would that be interesting to anyone? Did Emilio wake up some morning to the noise the trashmen were making and think he got a brilliant idea of making a movie out of that experience? It's a little different caliber when you compare it to James Cameron's fever-induced vision of a burning robot that gave us "The Terminator (1984)" as the end product.

Why would such a mundane, boring idea be something anyone wants to make a movie out of?

There are many other problems, but this movie doesn't deserve more effort on my part, frankly. Just to mention one more; that's not what being shot with a tazer looks like.

Just out of curiosity - has Charlie's brother ever been in a good movie?

P.S. Remembered one more thing to mention - people give small pauses before delivering parts of lines. This IMMEDIATELY destroys immersion. A good director would've re-shot those scenes. "I am not a comic book .... ... superhero. I am a pizzaman!" (added stupidity about this is that he had to grab and shake the pizza logo on his garment while saying that).

The other part, where this happens, is when the police actor is trying to remember the name of the name of the place.. it's a very brief pause, but the audience can tell that scene should've been re-shot. "You know, most of the folks here in Las... Playas"

There's a pause between "Las" and "Playas". It's not that long, but who would forget the name of the city they live in? That's like a cop living in New York saying.. "Most of the folks here in New... York". Ridiculous!

reply

Its a classic post 80's movie. A gem that will live on forever.

reply

Nope. Nothing 'classic' about it. It's as 'un-classic' as it gets.

But I have to hand it to you; FASTEST reply ever - I have not even fully composed my post yet, and you already managed to reply to it... kudos for that.

Though one thing about it IS fitting, if I twist your meaning a little; 1990s was a trashy decade, so it's befitting that a trashy movie about trash and trashmen is something considered a 'classic 1990s movie'.

Get back back to 1980s any day..

reply

[deleted]

Golf clap

reply

Movie is a classic

reply

They are cleaners, they make problems go away

reply

[deleted]

You complain about long scenes and then complain because a scene is shortened(cassette tape). Did you want them to play the entirety of both sides of the tape.... TO BE SURE.

Your stance on the tape is ludicrous. No offense.

reply

Your complaint about the cassette is so small to the overall plot that no one would notice anything you wrote in your comment. Men at Work is a cult favorite for a lot of people me included and Keith David as the crazy army vet is very funny in the movie.

reply

must be avortacs previous account

reply

Lol, I thought the same 🤣

reply

That was a ridiculous review of a lighthearted movie. Give me a fucking break.

reply

If you want to avoid more of those, most even more ridiculous, avoid "posted by avortac"


reply

Copy that!

reply