I'm in the middle of watching this movie, and I love George C. Scott's random angry outbursts. The characters around him constantly pissing him off, and never knowing if he's going to react or not. In one scene he tells the head of the hospital to shut up, and then just breaks down crying unexpectedly. His performance is making the film very entertaining. It's already miles better than "Exorcist II: Heretic", which I watched yesterday. Both sequels are far different from the original, but III seems to work a lot better than II.
While I appreciate your enthusiasm for the film, Kinderman's outbursts are a major turn-off for me. Gone is the gentle, avuncular Kinderman as originally written in the Exorcist novel; in the Exorcist screenplay; and - most imortantly - even in the new Legion novel.
In Legion, Kinderman remains the same likable, genteel (if not Gentile!), brilliant detective - as so perfectly played in the Friedkin film by Lee J. Cobb. I don't know if you've read Legion, but if you have, you are almost certainly sure to have noticed the huge discrepancy between Legion's Kinderman and Exorcist III's "Kinderman".
Instead, in Exorcist III, the real, authentic Kinderman of the novels has been replaced by a gruff, mean-spirited, short-tempered ogre, whose "random outbursts" today would probably make him the legitimate target of lawsuits. His treatment of underlings is fascistic, and so is his yelling at various strangers such as members of the hapless hospital staff. Although it can be argued that Scott is perfect for this part, it is the part itself that is inexcusable and without justification.
In fact, justification is the one and only crucial explanatory element for Kinderman's alteration that could possibly be offered. But it is not offered.
Exorcist III's Kinderman is a completely new, and unpleasant, creature. Some have tried to excuse the "new" Kinderman's various misbehaviors as the reactions of a world-weary homicide cop - a cop who is so beat down, depressed, discouraged, outraged, and despairing over all the crimes that he has investigated - and realizes that he cannot put an end to - has become a furious, alienated, snarling semi-psychopath. Just one or two lines of dialogue could have brought at least some illumination and explanation to the radical, negative changes in Kinderman's personality. Blatty's failure to explain the "new" Kinderman's bad attitudes and behavior creates, if not a plot gap, certainly a character gap - a character abyss, really. Especially in view of the fact that he made these changes to the character after he had written Legion, in which Kinderman is still the brilliantly gentle "Lee J. Cobb" character whom Blatty originally created.
This gap is, in my view, entirely inexcusable, and - along with other such incongruities as Kinderman and Karras having been "best friends" (!) - helps to make Exorcist III's screenplay the hodgepodge which it so unfortunately is. And so - I agree with you that Exorcist III's Kinderman does have anger issues - the difference being that you find them amusing and entertainingly off-the-wall; whereas I find them jarringly incompatible with the "known Kinderman", as well as silly and arbitrarily unkind, to boot.
The kid wasn't really a friend of his. Kinderman barely knew the boy. But outside of that, how many times has he dealt with cases that hit close to home even by the original? He wasn't so angry then. He was very calm and easy going so why is he now all of a sudden like this? It makes no sense.
As I've said I another thread, this Kinderman should have been a brother, not the same one from the original movie especially when that original actor died. They cast someone so different from Lee J. Cobb and write the character as such that it just ruins seeing this being the same guy.
dude, seriously? he was friends with that young black boy because of some community relations thing, that and he was friends movie buddies with that priest. That and him finding out about the new graphic murders where peoples heads are being cut off and replaced with statue heads etc.
Like I said you would be angry, sad emotionaal too if you had to deal with that crap if you're a cop
I'm gonna have to watch this movie again just for this part to see if you're telling the truth. Not sure how the BOOK had their relationship be but I don't recall the movie really touching on them being so close. Yes, Father Dyer's death would have an effect on him for sure so I'll give you that one.
But still, as a lieutenant who was doing this a really long time even by the original where he was senior age, I'm sure he seen enough to make him angry then. But the character wasn't written that way so for him to be like this especially with a different actor in the role just makes it all weird.
LIKE I SAID YOU WILD ANIMAL, I WILL CHECK IT OUT FOR MYSELF. DON'T YOU GO CALLING ME NAMES OR YOU'RE GOING TO END UP HEADLESS AND LIMBLESS WORSE THAN ANYONE IN THIS MOVIE HAD TO FACE. NOW BACK THE FUCK OFF AND WATCH THAT TONGUE BEFORE YOU FIND IT DANGLING BETWEEN YOUR LEGS.
I forgot verbatim but he was basically insulting me for not believing him on his statements against what I thought the deal was with Kinderman and his relationship with the black kid. Ugh, like dude bye. It's so not that deep. I haven't even checked back on this to believe him for certain nor do I care to do so now since he want to be a jerk. I still suspect Kinderman didn't have that much of a connection to the boy even if he did know him a little prior to the events of the movie.