I've seen it at the Fortune theatre in London, and found its lighting and sound design brilliantly effective - in fact all the theatrical illusions were magical and spellbinding - and also thought the performances of the two actors were exceptionally convincing. For me, though, it was ultimately more of a shocker than a chiller. Many of the shocks are genuinely terrifying, and the suspense created in scenes involving little more than ominous noises, flashing torchlight or a lit match is almost unbearable. In the version I saw, however, there was in my opinion one significant misstep, which occurred in the graveyard scene when the woman appears and disappears very quickly - it's a cheap "boo!" effect that doesn't allow us to see Kipps feeling pity for her commingled with creeping fear of her, gradually doubting that she's alive/earthly. To convey this, the script relies on basically quoting extracts of prose from the book.
So, of the three dramatized versions of the story - this film (1989), the play, and the latest movie (2012) - I would say that, for me, the one that most accurately captured the eerie atmosphere of the book was actually this movie, the TV movie. I think because it conveyed a stronger impression that Jennet/The Woman died in abject misery, so that the subsequent scares are more infused with real emotion. It really nails the cemetery scene, expertly building up the reveal of the woman and opting for a more human, less ghostly or corpse-like facial expression, concentrating more on her grief and misery for our first good look at her (and conveying the "desperate yearning malevolence" aspect more fully in a particularly memorable scene later on).
The play is very, very good though and definitely worth seeing.
reply
share