I remember it as "if you build it, THEY will come."

It's always been he that I know of - although just which he was ambiguous, at least initially. The only context in which they would make any sense (even to a half-crazy Iowa corn farmer) would be if for example Johnny Kinsella, the whole 'Blacksocks Brigade' and Moonlight Graham came to play.

After looking up some of what is said about this mandela effect thing, i somewhat take back the thing about how some remember things differently. Not that i think they are right and have legitimacy, but i was confused how they could think the timeline was being messed with and changed like back to the future. They believe by some new age woo that they somehow stepped into another reality and are living in an alternate revised version of the same reality where our history is the same but all the minor details are different. Sounds kind of pointless to me if you are doing this to run the world or something. Why not change bigger things that make it easier, and any potential setback they've had could be corrected? Instead they chose to change product and movie quotes. If that is the kind of elite that is running things, i think we should feel pretty secure as that is one hell of an incompetent elite.

This is the one and only time i have ever heard of Jiffy peanut butter, because i remember JIF all the way back to the 90s. Although Jiffy sounds like it would be a legitimate name, i can remember being real small and seeing JIF and those three colored panels that these three big letters are on. It somehow made me think of aladdin, though i am not entirely sure why. My guess is people probably said it that way as it seems to be some weird quirk of the older generation to say things differently than they are written, and they don't think about it for a long time and it is just kind of in the back of their heads. If American Dad is any indication, it had a different design altogether that is foreign to me.

I remember back to the early 2000s looking up some actress that did voices in an old cartoon that i am not entirely sure what it was, but i remember she appeared in Sex and the City, and i most certainly remember it saying AND rather than IN because i remember something jumping out at me with it being AND. Not exactly easy to explain, though i do remember thinking it sounded like a sum up of what people generally like or are into. I also had the fortune of reading the title first before hearing people speak it, which could be why many confuse it.

Queen, that one took me a minute because i too remember of the world at the end, but at the same time, it could just be that it left off without closure and my mind just filled it in. I thought of it and i do somewhat remember it leaving off like that too. If it was there, i suppose they made a radio edit or something.

I can't speak for nelson mandela as i didn't hear about him until recent years. Nor can i this movie, berenstain bears, star wars, or snow white as i either never seen those back then, or i was far too young when i was around them. The Berenstain bears i do seem to remember seeing them, but not much about reading their title. I feel like i may have seen it and read it as Berenstain because something about that does jump out, but i didn't know much about the name Bernstein back then. But then that could just be me. But I know a lot of people tend to hear something said a certain way, and when they glance at something spelled similar, they read it as that until they look closer at it. I know i have done stuff like that before. It kind of goes to show humanity's nature to assume things before actually looking into it.

Among other things. JCPenney i remember seeing only that, though i did sometimes think it was JCPenny, though that feels incomplete in my head looking at it. But we often think of Penney as penny, like the coin. The only evidence we have of JCPenny is old newspapers, which DO spell things wrong. Same with stuff like Skechers. One thing i notice about this so called "evidence" is that they never had the logo on them, just some text talking about them. Not even any legitimate copyright or ads from them, just some ad from some irrelevant store that probably does not exist anymore. I also am not 100% sure about Scarecrow, but i do seem to remember the Lion having repellent, but this was a viewing i had of the movie from back in 2007.

Also apparently some sinbad movie from the 90s that predates Kazaam apparently called something like Shazaam existed. Either a group of trolls humor this, or they really remember something that did not exist. I can't say anything about that because i have no memory of such a thing, but they all seem to remember close to the same thing. It seems like it is almost exactly the same movie aside from certain minor yet prominent differences, and i even saw some people claiming they remember a scene from it that i know for a fact is from Kazaam. Either some confusion is happening, or this really did exist. If it did, i also considered maybe it might not be so much the Mandela Effect but what if it was, instead, the Star Wars Holiday Special or the Wraith effect. Maybe it does exist, but after Kazaam, for some reason, they decided to remove all evidence of its existence, perhaps out of embarrassment or to avoid copyright issues?

Apparently this is some conspiracy to make us feel like we are losing our minds, though when i see something is different than i remember, i just go "Oh, okay." I don't have some sort of weird inner monologue questioning my mental state or whatever. Ironically, the Mandela Effect makes people do something closer to that far more than remembering things wrong. I just think it's an excuse people cooked up to feel special, and also feed their delusion that they can never be wrong. I just act like a grown up and accept that i can be wrong and move on, but whatever, that's just crazy me.

If i start seeing that Pokemon was always called Pocket Monster in the west, and Pokemon was just some weird slang term some kids had, and the famous song goes "Gotta Catch 'em all, Pock-et-Mon-ster.", if JFK was never assassinated, Michael Jackson died in 2013, Hubert Humphrey was president and sparked nationwide riots for four years and our country went into recession in the late 60s rather than the mid-70s, if presidents have four terms, then yes, we will most definitely talk. But it is all *beep* we can gloss over and mistake, which to me sounds like it never happened.



Evil must be punished!

Yes, it was always "he" but the "he" (which is in the beginning of the film -- we hear the voice again later with different statements) refers to Shoeless Joe Jackson. It is very clear in the first part of the film.

"Hearts and kidneys are tinker toys! I am talking about the central nervous system!"