Film doesn't age well


This film doesn't age well, and by that I simply mean that as a viewer grows up, this film becomes less appealing. I first saw Dead Poets Society as a freshman in college, and boy did it resonate with me! The message I got is that you should rebel against authority because they're a bunch of ignorant old fogies who want to extinguish your inner fire.

So the boys in the film rebel, and the young me found this very cathartic and inspiring, but the older and wiser me says, To what end? Isn't this just rebellion for the sake of rebellion? What are they rebelling against, exactly? A first rate education? A structured environment in which they are learning the skills and discipline necessary to succeed in life? What was Mr. Keating really teaching his students? His lessons in self-discovery now strike me as trite and haphazard, like he was inviting them to take a journey without first consulting a map. Teaching students to think outside the box is a worthwhile endeavor, but don't they at least need to understand what's in the box first?

reply

"The message I got is that you should rebel against authority because they're a bunch of ignorant old fogies who want to extinguish your inner fire."

You got the wrong message, IMHO. I think the message was more about digging deep, finding and embracing passions in life. The rebellion aspect seems to only make sense if you're against everything your elders are for. Granted, the school was pretty lifeless and dull but if your circumstances have that much of a hold over you then you're likely not going to be passionate anyway.

reply

The OP seem to forget that the "rebellion" didn't work out so well for a few of the boys most influenced. Keating's influence on Todd (Ethan Hawke) was probably the most beneficial, encouraging him to crawl out of his prison of hesitation and explore the "inner fire" he never thought he had in him. This was probably life changing for the positive for him, although his choice of college might have been derailed from his unwillingness to sell Keating down the river. But look what happened to Neil. He wasn't prepared to deal with his father's disappointment and ultimately killed himself. Charlie got expelled for his Keating inspired antics, and many other kids probably wound up with some scar or other on their transcripts. The filmmakers chose to include these consequences of youthful rebellion in their story. It seems clear to me that they were warning about precisely what the OP seems to think didn't happen in this movie. Namely, that a youthful, careless rebellion against authority (from kids even more sheltered than Keating) can have dire consequences. Why the OP chose to ignore this obvious theme to the ending is a mystery.

reply

Growing up as a working class kid I never understood the suicide over acting classes. That just blew me away. Given the problems I was working through the idea of someone shooting themselves because Daddy won't let them play pretend was just astounding to me.

I did love the poetry group though.

reply

I don't know but it sounds like you ended up agreeing with Neil's father?

Keating inspired the young boys to see outside the rigid box of educational requirements and to appreciate the arts and what inspired them into existence. I had college professors who were utterly perfunctory and dull and I had others who inspired me to hone in on my passions.

reply

It reminds me of when I go to my middle-aged, single sister-in-law's house and see the trite inspirational quotes she has framed on all the walls (even in the bathroom). It's corny and naive, and desperate for approval.

reply