There's nothing scummy about it. How is she more 'rescued' by knowing about 'the nightmare 1985' and having to live in it consciously, and having to go back to 1955 and sleep there? Nothing bad can happen to her, because from her perspective, reality changed INSTANTLY around her to the good 1985, and ALSO from her perspective, she fainted in a 'dreamy future', and woke up in 'normal 1985'.
What's to rescue and why? Rescue FROM WHAT?!
Some people really have difficulty thinking fourth-dimensionally. She's not left anywhere, and she doesn't need rescuing, when you have a TIME MACHINE.
Even if it takes 200 years for Marty and Doc to change the timeline, the end result is still the same; from her perspective, she's never in any danger, and as soon as Marty and Doc leave the 'nightmare 1985', everything instantly changed into 'normal 1985' from her perspective, and she even remains unconscious.
Even if she was murdered in the 'nightmare 1985', it wouldn't matter, because she would become 'un-murdered' in the 'normal 1985'.
The only problem is, she was put to her veranda or whatever in the 'nightmare 1985', so how come she's there in the 'normal 1985'? I mean, Doc and Marty would have to have carried her there ALSO in the 'normal 1985' for some reason, and ..
..well, it's a time-travel movie, the more you think about these things, the less anything makes sense.
But there's no 'scum' element here, EVEN IF you think as stupidly as you can, because Marty and Doc's motivations are pure, and they genuinely BELIEVE nothing bad can happen to her, because reality will change 'around her'.
It's the MOTIVATION that makes someone 'scum', so what's your motivation trying to paint Marty and Doc as scum??
reply
share