2.8 rating is a joke!


The only thing I can figure for this ridiculously low score is that, because the first movie is a cultural phenomenon, a lot of people who have never seen a b-movie in their life ended up seeing this. This isn't a great movie by any means, but it is far from bad. Sure, it's very unrealistic for a fish to hold a grudge, but that doesn't stop this from being a fun monster movie. I consider myself a b-movie connoisseur, and believe me, I have seen far worse movies with far higher scores.

"Aliens? Us? Is this one of your Earth jokes?"

reply

It is a very very bad movie, and that's coming from someone who also enjoys the odd B-movie every now and then.

As bad as Jaws 3-D was, it at least had a certain degree of self-awareness to it, like it was aware that it's a B-movie and wasn't trying to be anything more than that. Jaws: The Revenge seemed to be taking itself way too seriously for the most part and constantly plays homage to the original Jaws (via sepia toned flashbacks, references and recreated scenes) which only serves to remind viewers of how inferior this film is to it.

On top of the concept being downright ridiculous (Jaws 3-D at least tried, and didn't resort to supernatural elements) the movie itself is a complete bore, the shark has very little screen time (probably 15 minutes at most) and for the rest of the time we're subjected to our rather uninteresting main characters who are either being melodramatic, wallowing in gloom or making small talk. Jaws 3-D has pointless filler too but not quite as much as in this movie, and I found Lea Thompson in a bikini and frequent shots of water skiers more interesting than Michael Caine making small talk about how he can't handle winter (he's a good actor but his talent was wasted here on a dull script) or Mike Brody being jealous of his mother's blossoming relationship with Caine (what is he 12?).
If the shark had more screen time and less filler, this movie might be able to pass for being 'so bad it's good', like it's predecessor, but instead it's just plain bad.

While you're wondering why this has an unfairly a low score, here I am thinking 2.8 was too high.

reply

[deleted]

Typical B-movie with an excellent opening and a so bad it's just bad ending. I have seen worse though.

reply

No way is Jaws: The Revenge worse than snuff flick SpiceWorld: The Movie or that Z grade mess S Club: Seeing Double.

The original prints of both of those insult to film should be burned.

reply

You're right, 2.8 rating is a joke, closer to a 0!!! It is by far one of the worst movies ever made, the plot is stupid, the acting is over the top terrible and the ending is absurd, a shark the blows up after stabbing itself on a boat made of wood, give me a break

reply

You haven't seen enough bad movies then. This is definitely at least a 6, I gave it 10 because I like the movie but because the rating is ridiculously low.

reply

I countered your 10 with a 1 because the movie does pretty much stink. Hadn't you said that you gave it a ten, I probably give it a three.

reply

This is an awful movie, right up there with Showgirls and Glitter.

~~
So? I'll do the second act first..

reply

It isn't the greatest movie ever made but it's certainly better than a 2.8. I give it a 6/10. I think it's safe to say that Jaws didn't need any sequels and they were all probably made just to make money off the first film which is a classic. But just because a movie is unnecessary doesn't mean it's bad. I find it entertaining and if a movie can't be great, I just require that it doesn't be boring and I didn't think this film was at all.

reply

Shark moving on the water like Flipper, roaring( yes, roaring) like a T-Rex, nuff' said.

reply

It was boring. There were no thrills. Many implausible scenes.

reply

if the title didn't have the word 'jaws' in it, it might be passable but it makes a mockery of the great film 13 years earlier.

reply

I agree, it deserves way better than that.

reply

No, it doesn't.

reply