Brian Cox was absolutely awful
My god he just really really sucked as Lector. Such a caricature. Not intimidating at all. No wonder this isn't as famous as The Silence of the Lambs.
No expectations, no disappointments.
My god he just really really sucked as Lector. Such a caricature. Not intimidating at all. No wonder this isn't as famous as The Silence of the Lambs.
No expectations, no disappointments.
It's wasn't that Brian Cox was bad, it was the Anthony Hopkins was so good!!!
shareI disagree. He gave an excellent performance.
shareI disagree, Cox and Hopkins can’t really be compared, they were opposite style of performance, Hopkins played Lector like an otherworldly force of nature, Cox was basically a guy who you wouldn’t look twice at if you passed in the street, which one is scarier is down to peoples opinion.
shareWell said. I agree in full.
Thought they both were excellent.
This has to be a joke. Cox was brilliant. And sounds like the OP doesn't realize Hopkin's character didn't always exist.
shareNo way. Brian Cox was good.
shareBrian Cox was absolutely EXCELLENT!!!
shareIndie Filmmakers discuss LECTER vs LECTER - Which Hannibal IS BEST? and WHY?
https://youtu.be/TDvkKic782E
Brian Cox was EXCELLENT!!!
share