Why is this a classic? I don't get it
I watched this film for the first time the other week, after having heard for years how much of a 'classic' it is. So I think it would be fair to say that I had fairly high expectations. Now maybe that's where I went wrong because I was just amazed at how bad it really was.
The plot was totally ridiculous and made no sense. Instead of feeling any tension or drama I was laughing all the way through at how every event just got more stupid and overblown and ridiculous.
Rutger Hauer is always a pleasure to watch, so I'll give it that. And it's always nice to see Jeffrey DeMunn :)
Maybe my problem is that I only watched it now, instead of back in the 80's when it was made? I think it would be fair to say that in general people expect a lot more from films these days, in terms of plot and script and character development etc. (I mean, some of my absolute favourite films from the 80's would be laughed out of the cinema if they were made these days).
I dunno, maybe the people who consider this film such a 'classic' can explain to me why? What did I miss? Because reading some of the posts on this board I feel like a saw a completely different film.