MovieChat Forums > Jaws 3-D (1983) Discussion > Why this movie did NOT suck

Why this movie did NOT suck


Okay, the shark looks fake, especially the animatronics. The diver-in-the-mouth shot was unconvncing and not scary. The blue-background images were cheap and the script sounded like it was written by 8th graders! And really, I'm no marine biologist, but why would a large apex marine predator break into a park to feed on scrawny humans who occasionally might get into the water, when there are schools of large fish out in the open ocean?

Okay, but with that, the film is still worth watching. Why? The shorts! There are hundreds of girls of all ages in shorts that are VERY SHORT! Even a line at the beginning said "NO altering your uniforms, girls. Your shorts are short enough!" Personnally, I think shorts can never be too short! My gawd, what a nice collection of sexy bare legs! And those shorts are also tight on them! A true display of nature's beauty in over half the shots. Lea Thomson looks great in her tiny little shorts when she gets in those bumber boats! So yes, I'd recomend this film to hetero men and gay women! Nice view!

So there!

reply


man after my own heart.. yup hetero male here, and nothing wrong with short shorts'' amen... nuff said.
are you going to bark all day little doggie,, or are you going to bite

reply

Don't forget these ladies were all natural. No fake t1ts, natural lovely bodies. And probaly a nice trim lady garden. Women were real back then, and a lot more attractive.

reply

[deleted]

Best reason ever 

Very good. But brick not hit back!

reply

Um... I don't think 8th graders know how to sell theme park attractions, nor do they know about human relations...or sharks. And the shark followed the baby in. An 8th grader COULD understand that, why couldn't you? 

As for the rest of the film - I personally enjoy it. It's not for die hard fans of the first or even second, but it's still a well made, entertaining picture, if not an attribute to the first.

reply