I think it's a very good film, but like many I have no interest in rewatching it other than the parts involving Jack Nicholson (his acting is superb). It has a number of flaws: (1) Beatty is a terrible actor for this kind of supposedly serious film. His character portrayals always have a golly-gee dumb cluck component to them, which works for Shampoo and Heaven Can Wait, but fails here. He's also noticeably overshadowed in the company of Diane Keaton, Jack Nicholson, and Gene Hackman. (2) The present-day interviews were spliced in far too often and were distracting, constantly taking me out of the mental space of the movie. I like to immerse myself in the time period while watching, something impossible to do consistently when you're always confronted with octogenarians telling anecdotes. (3) It doesn't justify it's 3 hour+ running time. If you cut out all the interviews and repetitive protest scenes, it could've been a much improved film at 2 hours. Of these 3 items, Beatty's acting was the biggest problem. He's obviously an intelligent guy, so I wonder if he plays a cluck on purpose as a cheap appeal to women. Films like The Parallax View would also have been improved with a more credible actor who can communicate the seriousness of his situation more convincingly.
reply
share