Veronica65 above, from 10 years ago, got to the heart of it:
You have to think about the subtext. Romero said in interviews that a lot of the stuff about commercialization breaking them up was inspired by the breaking-up of the '60s generation (of which GAR was a member) and the erosion of the goals that they had. I read that when the movie came out and ever since that, I always see the fair as a commune of sorts.
It's also a statement by Romero about staying true to his independent filmmaker status, as opposed to working for a studio & compromising his vision. The ramshackle quality of the film is actually one of its virtues, I'd say. Not too neat & tidy, a little messy, but saying exactly what Romero hoped it would say. He trusts the audience to get the mythic & symbolic & deeply personal aspects, while also delivering an entertaining story to everyone who's willing to enter his vision.
And what is his vision, really? That one should maintain integrity, honesty, and strive to live by a meaningful code as best one can, despite the demands & temptations of the world. But he's also aware that one can't hide from the world, one can't use that code as an excuse for hurting people, as both Billy & Morgan learn by the end of the film.
I love that this film was released the same week as
Excalibur, as between them they truly capture & embody what the Arthurian mythos is all about, whether in a legendary past of the imagination, or right here in the everyday world.
And as someone who was a teenager in the 1960s, this is the film I recommend to younger people who want to know what that decade was all about. It offers the best of what motivated so many young, earnest, idealistic people who sought a better world: camaraderie, fellowship, loyalty, the pursuit of something more than just worldly success & ego & status. Yet it has a healthy dose of humor, including self-deprecating humor, in its characters. A favorite film of mine!
reply
share