Great example


--of a movie that lets the viewer's imagination do most of the heavy lifting. There's not a lot of gratuitous show-offy shots of the dragon (partially to not expose the weaknesses of the effects of course,) what we get is a very effective build-up of an enemy that's not just a monster but an environmental catastrophe, a natural disaster, something so bad people don't want to say it's name. This isn't a world where dragons crack jokes or noodle around; these dragons are volcanos or tsunami or a tornado alley. Characters might put traits like malice or sadism onto dragons but they say it the way we'd say February on the southern shore of Lake Superior is cruel.

reply

A better film for that. Showing monsters makes them less scary. Jaws is effective for the same reason.

I'm half-and-half on the "dragon as beast" thing. When the dragon is just an animal, it does - as you say - impart a bit of "realism" to the world and grounds the film. On the other hand, when it's basically just a way worse crocodile and there's nothing supernatural or intelligent about the beast, it makes it feel like the quest isn't that special. Galen is basically just a really specialised exterminator. They also take time to show the dragon mourn her young, so...they kinda try to eat their cake and have it to with the non-magical monster version of the wyrm.

reply