Turtle killing
I haven't seen the film, but I do wanna know how they killed the turtle....I mean I don't think it makes a horrible sound like the pig squeal which to me is just as sad as a dog's cry...
shareWhile I can understand killing for food, I think it was wrong how the turtle was killed. They cut off all of it's legs and it's tail first then decapitate it. Then, after cutting the bottom of it's shell, you can see it's heart is still beating and is possibly still alive (we have all heard the rumor that you can still live shortly after decapitation). Even if it didn't feel it, it is still disgusting that the people then went ahead and started scooping it's guts out and eating them. I love this film though, and I think it makes a great statement about humanity.
Movies Last Seen
127 Hours: 4.5/5
My Soul to Take: 2/5
Easy A: 3.5/5
I wouldn't bother about 4 animals being killed for a movie, whether they were used for food or not. We have seen animals & fish have worse than this turtle every single day. I'm sure atleast 10% if not more of chickens killed everyday are wasted in one way or they other.
I watched this movie 2 days ago. They decapitated the turtle before removing its limbs, tail and finally, its shell. Its mouth and legs still move due to nerves, which makes it seem as if it's still alive when its legs are removed, but it isn't. It's the same phenomena that leaves chickens running around after their heads have been removed.
And, no, turtles are not capable of screaming or making any other vocal sound. They just twitch.
Yes, the turtles head is cut off first. The blond guy Jack even holds the head up to his mouth at the camera and mocks that he's gonna eat it. Only then do they remove the shell.
shareWait a minute! This people are defending the killing of these animals because later the meat and carcases were used as food or were "consumed"? Does that mean that anyone who's hungry can grab their or anyone's pets (Dogs, cats, etc.) and eat them? That would be OK, right? For example: "Oh don't cry little girl, your doggie was delicious, here want a leg?"
That part of the film was garbage, even if you're hungry your morals tells you that killing for fun or entertainment is totally wrong, period.
You wouldn't bother?? Call me crazy, but I think killing animals in a cruel way is way worse than killing people (at least the evil ones). Animals are innocent and people aren't. That simple, yes.
"It's All in the Game."
My Vote History: imdb.com/user/ur10932798/ratings
While I can understand killing for food, I think it was wrong how the turtle was killed. They cut off all of it's legs and it's tail first then decapitate it. Then, after cutting the bottom of it's shell, you can see it's heart is still beating and is possibly still alive (we have all heard the rumor that you can still live shortly after decapitation). Even if it didn't feel it, it is still disgusting that the people then went ahead and started scooping it's guts out and eating them. I love this film though, and I think it makes a great statement about humanity.
If you actually watched the scene more closely, you'd noticed that they decapitate the turtle first and then cut off its legs and tail. You got the order wrong.
I do agree with the statement about humanity though. Humans are capable of really terrible things.
Welcome to my Nightmare- Freddy Krueger
Totally agree
share