I am not saying this to troll or to be sarcastic, but exactly how is it considered animal cruelty in this film when the animals killed where either dead or dying by the first actual hit? I would agree totally if they ripped the animal to pieces while it was still alive, but they didn't they killed it first. You have to eviscerate an animal after killing it to get to the good pieces, and we know that the animals were eaten so I am failing to see the torture here.
sharea monkey having its head cut open; a turtle being decapitated and disemboweled (extremely close shot of the head and legs being cut off and it's shell being pulled open; this spills out the animal's guts which are torn out by some men and eaten); a pig being kicked and then shot; a coati having its throat cut; and a tarantula spider and a snake being cut in two with a machete.
share[deleted]
I'd say that the pig endured cruelty and the coatimundi endured terrible cruelty. Otherwise, I agree.
Life is a hideous thing...
You definitely saw a cut version.
The turtle is very much alive when they tear him apart. Moving and all. And its pretty real.
I guess you have never killed an animal for food in real life. They clearly show it's head being cut off first. Even after you kill something the limbs still move, it is just the nerves in the body firing off as the rest of the body dies.
shareThat monkey was clearly in distress as it was killed, you'd have to be an idiot not to see it as animal cruelty.
~ I'm a 21st century man and I don't wanna be here.