Dreyfuss gives an energetic, strong performance in a weak film. I know, I know: some people really liked this movie when it came out and, I imagine, still do but even from the first time I saw it many years ago, I recognized its weaknesses primarily Mason's Paula character. No offense to Mason (a fine actress. See "Cinderalla Liberty") but here, she's saddled with a character who is unlikable and unsympathetic and then turns romantic all of a sudden. Plus, her acting amounts to either mugging or moping.
But back to Dreyfuss and his Oscar win. I recall that Richard Burton was considered the favorite to win. Not a "lock" necessarily because the film he was nominated for ("Equus") was not overly well received. But the Oscar was his to win for his long career and for being nominated six times previous to this (five for Best Actor, once for Supporting Actor). I also distinctly remember hearing that when the award was announced, when the presenter said "Richard...." he actually got up from his seat until he heard "Dreyfuss". In short, it was not a stellar year for actors so technically speaking, Dreyfuss' win could be justified by a lack of competition. It IS a solid performance but I don't think he would have won if there had been more competition.
reply
share