Why would M say that?!


When M says to Bond "May I remind you that Blofeld's dead, the least we can expect from you is plain solid work!" Isn't that very mean since Blofeld killed his wife in the previous film OHMSS. What do you guys think?

reply

Well it's been two years. So has James Bond chasing this dude around for two years to get revenge? It seems like the state SPECTRE was in by 1971 Blofeld was probably a lot less relevant than he was just two years ago. I imagine just like OHMSS Bond couldn't let getting this guy get away go. And he would have been worse about it after Tracy's death, not that you can tell if you watched DAF. M was probably really annoyed with Bond at this point.

reply

Nothing ever suggests this movie is a sequel to OHMSS.

reply

It is because in the beginning of DAF why would Bond go around the world furiously looking for Blofeld? Tracy isn't mentioned but it's quite obvious why he's looking for him after what happened at the end of OHMSS.

Also all the Bond films from Dr. No to DAD are sequels to each other as it's a one timeline continuity. For example Pierce Brosnan's Bond in TWINE says "the world is not enough" is his "family motto". He found out about the family motto in OHMSS. Also Electra asks Bond if he's lost a "loved one" which Pierce's Bond doesn't answer and changes the subject. This was an obvious reference to Tracy. So yeah DAF is a sequel to OHMSS.

reply

It is because in the beginning of DAF why would Bond go around the world furiously looking for Blofeld?


He is not that "furious" after Blofeld. He's just chasing his old enemy and the leader of Spectre, but still takes the time to chat politely with him.
It is clearly NOT a continuation of OHMSS.

Also all the Bond films from Dr. No to DAD are sequels to each other as it's a one timeline continuity.


We all know the first 20 films are sequels with the same timeline.
Nobody said that DAF is a "reboot" or anything.

We're just saying that there was a decision to just ignore the events of OHMSS.

reply

While On Her Majesty's Secret Service was in post-production, Richard Maibaum wrote a full script for Diamonds Are Forever that was in fact a direct sequel. It was intended for Lazenby before he bailed out. On Her Majesty's Secret Service would've ended up with Bond and Tracy driving off and the death would've been part of the pre-titles of Diamonds Are Forever.

reply

Wow. Wish that happened.

reply

Nothing ever suggests this movie is a sequel to OHMSS.

It technically is, but I can see how you'd think it isn't. There's no mention of Tracy or the events of OHMSS, and Sean Connery is back, making one think this was a direct sequel to YOLT.


http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

reply

Hunting Blofeld I guess was more of a personal thing.


http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

reply

I guess he means he can focus on actual assignments rather than going around the world strangling women with their bikini tops.

reply

I think M was referring to Blofeld killing Tracy

reply

It's possible that since two years elapsed between the release of OHMSS and DAF, that two years have passed in the Bond universe , too. Nowhere is it said that DAF happens immediately after OHMSS. Bond still wants Blofeld dead, and he indeed looks pretty pissed off in the pre titles sequence, but his grief may have healed a little in the two years since the last film

reply

Nowhere near as insensitive as Moneypenny asking Bond to bring back a diamond, in a ring.

It's been suggested before that they just ignored OHMSS and carried on from YOLT. That's why the film opens with Bond still in Japan and explains Moneypenny's remark, since Bond wasn't a widower, M thought Blofeld dead after the volcano blew up, (we know Blofeld was alive at the end of OHMSS so why would M think he was dead) and Bond' reaction when he meets Blofeld. I don't know about any of you guys but if I mt my wife's murderer I'd rip the head off his shoulders and crap in the stump. I wouldn't sit there politely chatting.

reply

It was always left purposely ambiguous. Bond's relentlessly hunting Blofeld, but it also begins in Japan. That leaves either option open to interpretation. Most of the script seems to ignore OHMSS more than acknowledge it:

In addition to M's comment we have:

1. Monepenny's comment about James bringing her "a diamond...on a ring". Not really the time to go back to their old flirtation if he'd lost his wife and just achieved closure.

2. After finding Blofeld still alive, there's no hint his anger has returned. He treats him no differently than any other villain.

3. His willingness to sail around the world with Tiffany at the end. Bedding her as part of a mission is one thing. Establishing a personal relationship, is another.

Tracy isn't mentioned again until "The Spy Who Loved Me". I'm guessing the feeling was enough time had passed to acknowledge the painful backstory, for Bond to have moved on in life, and for Moore to be settled in the role.

reply

When M says that Blofeld is dead, wasn't he referring to Bond drowning him in the mud in the pre-credits sequence of DAF ? Not confusing to me

reply

When M says to Bond "May I remind you that Blofeld's dead, the least we can expect from you is plain solid work!" Isn't that very mean since Blofeld killed his wife in the previous film OHMSS. What do you guys think?

I think what it meant was M allowed Bond a lot of leeway to go after Blofeld for personal reasons given Blofeld was responsible for Bond's wife's death in OHMSS (Bond is see killing his way to Blofeld at the beginning of this film), and once Blofeld was eliminated, M expected Bond to return to some semblance of normalcy. This somewhat conflicts with elements later in the film given the fact Bond doesn't go apesh*t when he discovers Blofeld is still alive.

reply