MovieChat Forums > Coogan's Bluff (1968) Discussion > Eastwood as an antihero cowboy cop in mi...

Eastwood as an antihero cowboy cop in mid-60’s Manhattan


This is a crime drama/thriller with bits of droll amusement, e.g. New Yorkers constantly making references to Texas, Wyatt, the O.K. Corral and the like. It inspired the TV series McCloud, which aired from 1970-1977; and also was the prototype for Siegel & Eastwood’s “Dirty Harry." The two teamed-up for three other films: “Two Mules for Sister Sara," “The Beguiled” and “Escape from Alcatraz."

"Coogan's Bluff" was the blueprint for Clint’s post-Leone cop character, which dominated crime cinema for the next 25-30 years (and arguably longer), including winners like “Thunderbolt and Lightfoot” and “The Gauntlet." It may not be as compelling as some of these later movies, and it’s certainly dated by comparison -- an interesting period piece to view mid-60’s Manhattan -- but it is entertaining despite the focus on drama above action and unpalatable depictions of the seedy side of Gotham.

Speaking of the sordid elements, this was ‘cutting edge’ at the time and nigh shocking to those not living in the Big City. Eastwood’s character, Coogan, will do whatever it takes to bring his man in, even something immoral with a 17 year-old teenager. While he’s confident and has several admirable traits, there’s also a darker, unpredictable edge.

There’s been some confusion about the eponymous bluff. Although the movie mentions the landmark promontory in upper Manhattan in a deleted scene, it literally refers to Coogan’s bluffing his way into the hospital ward to apprehend his prisoner and get out of town, which sets up the events of the rest of the picture. If there’s any doubt, the lieutenant detective (Lee J. Cobb) plainly references his bluff.

In addition to Susan Clark and Tisha Sterling, the female cast includes Melodie Johnson (Millie in the first act) and Meg Myles (Big Red).

reply

Nice write-up. I watched this after all the Dirty Harry films as I wanted to see more of this kind of performance from Eastwood. It was interesting to see a character which is clearly unpredictable (as you say) and how he dealt with the 'city folks'. Overall, it's not something I'd probably watch again.

reply