I like older movies and I'm not a dumb action movie guy, but I really don't get why this movie is so revered. Its over 2 hours of drinking, screaming and over the top acting about there sad and depressing lives. I could barely sit thru it. I think Richard Burton was a standout in this movie and probably deserved the oscar, but I have never liked Liz Taylor in anything and I think she is the most overrated actress in history.
I think the 60's was an awkward decade for hollywood anyway. With the golden age of big studios and legendary actors fading away and the crumbling of censorship there was a transition period as to which direction to go. There was also the strong influence of more arty and raw independent/foreign movies that was tugging at them as well, and for me it wasn't until the early 70's until it all came together. The 40's and 70's were the best decades for Hollywood. What do you think?
like Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton, but this movie SUCKS. It's boring and I like a lot of boring films. I've even BEEN to faculty parties that were exactly like THIS one and this film still sucks. So if you want to call me dense and non nuanced or non sphisticated, go ahead. THIS FILM SUCKS!
how can you say you like burton and taylor and not like this film? they've never been better....ever (esp burton). its the pinnacle of their work together....and apart. for the acting alone its a great film. its like saying you love joe namath but hate when he won the superbowl.
Just as a point of reference, a good or even great movie is not always a pleasant experience. VIRGINIA WOOLF and BOYS IN THE BAND have similar plots and themes; in some ways they are like watching a splendid train wreck: you might wish you could look away, but you can't.
Stanley Kubrick's A CLOCKWORK ORANGE also comes to mind, an unquestioned masterpiece but an experience so unpleasant that I saw it once and swore never to see it again, and I am the type who enjoys revisiting good films.
There are plenty of other examples: BONNIE AND CLYDE, NETWORK, CITIZEN KANE (a very painful experience for a musician to sit through)...the list goes on.
Entertainment is not the sole purpose of the movies; if it were, every movie would be as glossy and empty as TITANIC.
Never mess with a middle-aged, Bipolar queen with AIDS and an attitude problem! ><
I'm inclined to agree as well. I found the movie disturbing but I wouldn't go so far as to say I didn't like it but I'm not likely to watch it again. I got tired of all the screaming and fighting. "Oh Blanche? You know we got rats in the cellar"
The performances Taylor and Burton gave was so convincing it resulted in creating an intense atmosphere in which I was pulled into their world. The atmosphere felt so intense from my point of view that I almost related to the position Nick was in, questioning their behavior. Being a spectator within this atmosphere for a period of time left me thinking about the dynamics of their relationship long after the film ended. The atmosphere Taylor and Burton successfully created was the element which helped bring to life the horrific side to their characters.
"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not".
The movie is about so much more than drinking and screaming. It is complex and unnerving, but I just can't imagine someone saying it is boring. Some people just can't peel back the layers and see what it is all about. That is OK, but to call it bad or a waste of time is just ridiculous.
While, I understand that this movie will always have its detractors who will never be able to understand and fully embrace this film as incredibly “artistic”, or “creative”, or “good” by a large segment of the population of any generation, in any country, at any time in history.
However, there will always be a large portion of the population that will be enthralled and hypnotized during their cinematic journey into the “The Theater of the Absurd” performed by great actors that's amped up with stunning black & white photography by a director who knows how to convert material that's originally created for the stage into a uniquely intense cinematic experience. I'm one of those enthralled hypnotized people.
So, with nothing but peace and love in my heart for all of humanity, I'll attempt to explain to all the "Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf?" dislikers and misunderstanders (are those even words?) what's up with all the "Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf?" lovers, and how we can even stand to watch this movie. In what's probably a vain attempt to create at least a better understanding between one another, but here it goes anyway.
OK, first of all, I think it's important to remind everyone that there actually was an early 19th century female intellectual literary giant named Virginia Woolf, and like Ayn Rand, devoted her life to living without false illusions until she committed suicide in 1941. In her last note to her husband she wrote:
Dearest, I feel certain that I am going mad again. I feel we can't go through another of those terrible times. And I shan't recover this time. I begin to hear voices, and I can't concentrate. So I am doing what seems the best thing to do. You have given me the greatest possible happiness. You have been in every way all that anyone could be. I don't think two people could have been happier 'til this terrible disease came. I can't fight any longer. I know that I am spoiling your life, that without me you could work. And you will I know. You see I can't even write this properly. I can't read. What I want to say is I owe all the happiness of my life to you. You have been entirely patient with me and incredibly good. I want to say that—everybody knows it. If anybody could have saved me it would have been you. Everything has gone from me but the certainty of your goodness. I can't go on spoiling your life any longer. I don't think two people could have been happier than we have been.
While Virginia Woolf's suicide note may have provide us with some insight into at least an aspect of Virginia Woolf's personal struggles, and how it affected her marriage. However, as difficult as their marriage may have been at times, of course it doesn’t necessarily mean that it was anything close to George and Martha's, match made in hell, as depicted in "Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf?".
So, for a little more insight into the characters George and Martha, we now turn our attention toward the original author of the play, Edward Albee, who was expelled by a lot of Academies and Universities before continuing his formal education at Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut, where he was also expelled in 1947. In response to his expulsion, Albee's play 'Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?' is believed to be based on his college experiences.
And, the title of his semi-autobiographical play, according to an interview in the Paris Review, Albee said he first found the question "Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf?" scrawled in soap on the bathroom wall of a New York bar. When he later began writing the play he recalled the rather typical, university intellectual joke that he had seen written on the bathroom wall in NY ten years earlier. But, what does the title mean, and why should I care? Glad you asked.
Although, we may never know what the person who likes using soap to graffiti NY bathrooms with non-sequiturs involving literary legends who commit suicide meant, however, Edward Albee's story is quite clear that, "Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf?" is about people struggling with living a life of manufactured illusion vs choosing to confront, and, properly process the sometimes harsh realities of life, and properly dealing with the regret from the decisions one makes during the coarse of a persons life.
While a majority of plays, movies and TV shows often encourage living a life of self-illusion, which requires a lot of suppressed memories and blissful ignorance in order to achieve a sense of happiness for a short while. Edward Albee's "Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf?", on the other hand, demonstrates the human tragedy of choosing such a life of manufactured illusion over a life in pursuit of acquiring self-knowledge and properly processing personal trauma.
The theater of the absurd manner in which Edward Albee illustrates the tragic consequences of making such a disastrous choice should force every audience member to ask him or herself the question, “Who is afraid of facing reality?”, and, “Do you live in a world of false illusions of your own making?” by its conclusion. Well, do you? Be honest now.
Unfortunately, for a lot of people, they have to come to the plays resolution by following the drunken tumultuous lives of George and Martha who are lost in their everyday illusions. And, because misery loves company, George and Martha have a need to share their drunken tumultuous illusionary lives on young unsuspecting dinner guests. So if George and Martha ever invite you over for dinner? Don’t expect any food, but the alcohol will be plentiful, and the conversation will be really interesting, in a very surreal kind of way.
After George and Martha's finish messing with the heads and lives of their dinner guests they’re left to themselves, a quiet, calm moment befalls the main characters. In Albee’s stage directions, he instructs that the final scene is played “very softly, very slowly.” Martha reflectively asks if George had to extinguish the dream of their son. George believes it was time, and that now the marriage will be better without games and illusions.
The final conversation is a bit hopeful. Yet, when George asks if Martha is all right, she replies, “Yes. No.” This implies that there is a mixture of agony and resolution. Perhaps she does not believe that they can be happy together, but she accepts the fact that they can continue their lives together, for whatever it is worth.
In the final line, George actually becomes affectionate. He softly sings, “Who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf,” while she leans against him. She confesses her fear of Virginia Woolf, her fear of living a life facing reality. It is perhaps the first time she reveals her weakness, and perhaps George is finally unveiling his strength with his willingness to dismantle their illusions.
Reality vs Illusions? Not being afraid of facing the Truth, or living a life of manufactured lies and fantasies? What's it going to be?
I remember watching this film when I was young and I found it a bit disturbing, but as life has gone along I find this movie quite poignant as I have come across people just like this. Apart from the characters, I have to say that this film for it's time and even now I find very well acted and the direction and camera angles to be very well done...no wonder it received so many oscars. If you don't get it. You just don't get it. No one can teach this. You ever like a film or you don't. There is no way around that.
I didn't like this movie at all. It was long and boring. If I wanted to watch a couple scream at each other for hours on end, I would have just stayed in my previous relationship. I can't even imagine what inspired someone to make a play out of this in the first place. And the ending ... I figured out the whole thing about their son from the beginning, but I can't for the life of me figure out WHY. What was the point of it? For that matter, what was the point of the entire story?