Only type of people who will like this movie are
i) pretentious fools
ii) pseudo intellectuals
iii) hitchcock blind fans
i) pretentious fools
ii) pseudo intellectuals
iii) hitchcock blind fans
Tippi Hedren isn't my favorite, but this is better than Marnie.
Rod Taylor isn't my favorite either.
AVADA KEDAVRA!!!
nothing to do with who the actors are
many people call this hitchcock's best
as per me, they are fools
NOBODY has called this "Hitchcock's best", you FOOL.
Yet the film is still astonishing in its editing, use of color and
photography. There is an air of creepy disquiet, and Hitch's
framing and tonality still pack a punch.
Go and watch "The Matrix" (gee, that's a film with SIGNATURE - couldn't
possibly be remade, as the direction, writing and "performances" Keanu
Reeves is SUCH an acting talent...).
You get the picture.
Now get lost.
[deleted]
I'd love to see the scientific theory behind your classifications of people who like this film. It sounds so academic.
And no, story is not always everything. Many fans and critics praise Argento and his stories are often threadbare.
Stop trying to push your personal assessment of films onto everyone as if you are stating facts.
if u make a far fetched stupid story, have the balls to explain it, else i would abuse the movie, as simple as that
Curious as to if your opinion and expectations of art (paintings, sculpture) is the same as it is for movies.
Ephemeron.
Mystery-fan: Do you derive some perverse form of satisfaction in making unsolicited jabs and insults? Must suck to be you!
sharei am not here to troll or something
i have seen over 2000 movies, so i am not a casual movie watcher
just that i dont have the patience for a movie which shows a *beep* story without explaining it
just that i dont have the patience for a movie which shows a *beep* story without explaining it
Kids enjoy The Birds, and they don't fall into any of your odd categories. Judging from the level of your writing, I think your problem may be with real intellectuals, not pseudo ones.
shareany kid who enjoys this movie, there is a serious problem with the kid, due to following reasons:
1- there are scenes like a dead body with eyes missing
2- Birds are not shown in a positive manner, they are attacking people mostly
3- the friggin' noise they make, as an adult also i was pissed, i doubt any kid would like that horrible noises
I was in elementary school when this came out and every kid I knew in school, friends etc enjoyed this movie.'Horror' flicks were big at the time - they even made models for kids to build based on the early horror genres like Dracula, Frankenstein, The Wolfman etc.
I had them all as did most of my buddies. What we liked about this movie was that it was different and made by Hitch. He was a character and someone we were all aware of because he was on TV quite a bit. His macabre sense of humor fit in with the weekend horror TV shows such as 'Creature Feature' (pronounced phonetically: 'creetcha-feetcha in the NYC area :-) and "Chiller Theatre"... You have to remember that movies came and went in those days.. you had no expectation of ever seeing them again as there was no way to record them. This movie was 'original' and one in which you had NO idea where it was going !!
At 10 years old, we didn't leave the theatre thinking/discussing 'What did it all mean ?'
It was more like "Did you see the eyes - how they were pecked out ? Cool !!".
Get it ?????
Good to know that the morons and philistines out there don't like The Birds. It's life affirming and sh-t.
"facts are stupid things" Ronald Reagan
"Pretentious pseudo-intellectual fools"?
Really??
By the standards of the time, THE BIRDS was quite simply the creepiest movie out there, and even kids all thought so.
Not much pretentious about that.
Yes, it's been surpassed in the subsequent half-century with newer, louder, gorier fare, but that always happens.
Which is better? Depends on your tastes, I guess. Some people like creepy atmosphere which casually builds, and some people like something else.
--
LBJ's mistress on JFK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcXeutDmuRA
...Or just fans of great cinema.
**********************************************
'Divas, Damsels & Smudged Mascara' - classic film reviews of movies w/female protagonists & thoughts on women in film
http://divasdamselsandsmudgedmascara.tumblr.com/
I was thinking the same thing.
It's kind of sad that great films attract so many haters, mostly angry that there are so many movie fans who like films made before 1985. And the haters seem to be very self-conscious because they don't understand movies that are more than 30 years old. So they must lash out at these "hipsters" who are oppressing them by ... liking something they don't like.
(I'll probably get reported to the moderators again for being so mean.)
Janet! Donkeys!
Yep. I was raised on old movies. I grew up on AMC and VHS tapes of 40s, 50s and 60s dramas, comedies and musicals. I never considered it a hipster thing to love old movies, that's a new one to me! In fact, I'm totally bewildered as to why anyone could NOT enjoy a movie pre-1985. I'm a classic film buff and "The Birds" is one of the finest pieces of horror filmmaking ever. It ranks right up there next to 'Psycho' as my favorite Hitchcock film. Perfect screenplay, great performances, suspenseful pacing.
************************************************************
'Divas, Damsels & Smudged Mascara' - classic film reviews of movies w/female protagonists & thoughts on women in film
http://divasdamselsandsmudgedmascara.tumblr.com/
[deleted]
Thanks for sharing your opinion with us
shareLook who sounds pretentious right now...
share