I thought this movie was interesting and very well done, but a lot of people talk about how moved they felt after it, or how introspective it made them feel. In honesty, I didn't really feel anything while watching this, nor did it make me think about death any differently that I currently do about death. My guess for this would be that I am not religious, nor have I even been, and I have never seriously entertained the idea of an afterlife, whereas this movie is centered on a very personal battle of a man questioning his faith and his views of death.
So do people find that this is a movie that appeals most readily to those that do wrestle with the idea of religion and death? Or are there other patent non-believers that were moved by this film?
I was moved by the scene where Block helps Jof get away. I also liked the dialogue near the end when death arrives to Block and everyone with him (dick move visiting your wife when death is after you, bro).
I just liked it as a film.
We are eagles of one nest, The nest is in our soul
As an atheist this movie did not move me. I think I have come to terms with death mostly and the conflict in the film was a throwback to a younger me. I expect I would have been more moved back then because this movie parallels my earlier inner thoughts very well.
Overall it was a little boring, but I still liked it.
I would think in going back to the OP, not being an atheist myself, but in reading the responses here, it makes sense to recognize there are two kinds of atheist, just as there are two basic ways to look at the question as the film itself portrays.
One, like that of the Squire, is to basically show impatience with the whole question. Whether they are right or wrong in any sense of absolute truth to do so is not really the immediate point, altough it indirectly does come back to that. But impatience, as for Jons in the film, is the way such people orient themselves to this basic fact and circumstance of existence, what Heidegger called being towards death.
Such people tell themselves and all others who will listen that, among other things, the question itself, and consideration of it, are both "boring". Instead they focus on other things, which by their nature are in their everyday lives, and therefore provide the comfort of involvement in everyday life. This in turn allows them, enables them, to turn away from this existential questioning.
But it should be apparent that there is an inauthenticity involved in such a turning away. The elements of our everyday lives do not, in and of themselves, have any intrinsic meaning, in the sense of providing an alternative to Nothingness. They instead are most significant in the way in which they serve to distract those who do so from examining the meaning of their lives, and possibly its lack of meaning.
They ignore or turn away from Socrates's maxim that the unexamined life is not worth living.
Of course some may respond, I have already thought about this, and it is pointless to think further on it, since there is no answer, and only Nothingness.
On its face this is not without basis. But to then say, to take on the mantle of, indifference and boredom, still strikes me as an inauthentic way to characterize one's relation to the meaning of one's life, or lack thereof.
As a contrast the atheist who does in fact examine and have awareness of being towards death as fundamental to human existence, and cannot comfort themselves for whatever reason with a belief in God, or even the possibility of God's existence, would inevitably be troubled by such understanding. Not completely unlike those atheists wholly caught up in a way of being that is totally within the everyday world, they may live in that world and for the most part not think, not contemplate, the fact they are being towards death. But their underlying awareness of the truth that they are, I think, makes their life situation more authentic, true to the essential nature of existence, as compared to those who ignore and have no patience for that understanding.
In short those who understand and acknowledge this fundamental reality will not be bored by such recognition. They will be more like Antonius Block as compared to Jons. They will not be bored by The Seventh Seal, either. That boredom is left to those who insist on an inauthentic relationship with being torwards death.
As a postcript one might say there is in fact a third type of atheist, whether or not he or she might overlap with the two identified here, but having a distintive characteristic not identified yet. And that would be what we could call the committed nihilist. Such a person, in theory, can accept both the lack of metaphysical meaning that seeing death as Nothingness effectively requires, as well as see themselves as "not fooled by" the inauthentic "meanings" found in everyday life.
Well, I can imagine such a person in theory, but imagining such a person as really existing is quite a bit harder.
leaving out that third theoretical type of atheist, we seem to have come to a basic distinction.
Those atheists who find The Seventh Seal to be boring, to have no interest in or sympathy for its fundamental questions and searching, can be seen as being of the inauthentic type, fooling themselves that they can find meaning in everydayness.
Those on the contrary who identify with The Seventh Seal, who recognize that its questions relate to the basic nature of existence, are to at least some extent more authentic, even if that realization is unpleasant, uncomfortable, and even terrifying at times. That and that Socrates would approve.
I appreciate your analysis very much and would respond that I am the third type. A "committed nihilist" is a great description of me.
SS does relate to a basic nature of existence, specifically death, very realistically. Death is a scary thing. However I have thought much about this and come to realize that not existing cannot be a negative experience because there is no experience. It is probably the same as before you were born. I have come to terms with death. The movie portrays death extremely bleakly which is how I used to think of death. But I now I don't see any reason to. It is slightly tiring to be told to be afraid of something you aren't. That's why death as the antagonist does not intrigue me quite as much as is does most. I can sympathize with Block, but I can't fully identify with him.
I do spend a lot of my time thinking about things of this nature and do not use every day occurances as distractions.
I think Socrates' quote is an exaggeration because life can be worth living without examining it. However I enjoy examining life and agree with the spirit of the quotation.
Ftr I am certainly not trying to make you more uncomfortable than you may be. But I think it is worth noting that there is a difference between Nothingness and being towards death.
Being in the world in my experience is very much tied up with a search for meaning. As Heidegger and others pointed out, this search occurs in relation to the concept of Care, which in practical terms, and in its more authentic expression, is manifest in caring for others.
It is inherent, I think, in human relations for us to be saddened by the death of those we care about, and to, if we have any power to do so, do what we can to hold off the death of those we care about. Even religious people who believe not only in the after life but believe their deceased loved one is or has already gone there will be sad they are gone.
Similarly the notion that a loved one might die leads to anxiety.
I am sure you feel the same about those you care about.
You may have made a deal with yourself, an understanding that you are indifferent to the concept of your own demise, but those who care about you probably do not share it.
In short, in spite of what you say, anxiety is intrinsic to the condition, the essential nature of existence, that is being towards death.
I am saddened when loved ones die because I experience their absence. But as far as movies go if characters die at the end of the film I usually do not not feel the same way because they would cease to exist at the end of film anyway and I do not care so much about these characters as I do for real people.
Besides SS analyzes death on a personal level more than it does on an interpersonal level. Personal death I am ok with and thus don't identify with the film.
I see I am not being very successful at getting you to see my point, but I do not agree that only the personal is a focus in Seventh Seal. Block is after all returning to his wife who he has not seen in years. He cares about the woman being put to death, and the family with the circus like show.
What he is troubled by his his how to relate to them while he is, for the obvious reason that Death has already told him he is about to die, not at some indeterminate point in the future, and before Block has been able to find any consolation, whether from God or some other person or something, really anything, else, so directly confronted by his being toward death.
In other words, Block is not only concerned with his personal fate in a vacuum.
PS: I'm agnostic on the creation front (in that I have no reason to believe in nothing over the FSM over Descartes' demon over the Christain god over a team of programmers over a baby god playing with lego), but given how often we create stuff without giving it any kind of afterlife, and given how little I care about the time that passed before I existed, I'm not too hopeful or worried about an afterlife.
I'm an apathetic atheist - I could really care less if there's a God. If there is, then cool, I have some questions to ask after I die. If - as I envision it - you simply rot away in the ground, then that's fine too.
I was moved by the film, not because it made me question my atheism, but simply because it was a haunting and emotionally effective film. The scene where Block confesses his sins to Death is up there with the best scenes in cinema history. Like all great scenes, there was a perfect storm of perfection, from the performances, lighting, camera work, writing, editing - now that's a SCENE!
It sounds like an expression intended to be characterized as apathetic, not caring, but also not professing to know, whether God exists, at least categorically on the question of existence sounds more agnostic than atheistic. Care in that context is a rather bizarre word to use. Does it not matter? "cool!" Hm. Cool suggests it does, at least to some extent, and I question the truthfulness of someone saying the nly concern is that one would have "quesions". is this intended to be some post modern irony?
I have a certain amount of respect for people who say they've examined the subject, thought it through on perhaps a number of levels, and that belief in God does not make sense to them. Even then ftr I would say such thought process does not establish God's non-existence. We have imperfect knowledge, and are hardly only capable of analysis that always leads to the correct conclusion. But the sense part of it is there.
I suppose I can even understand someone saying that they live their life in a way that it will not matter whether God exists or not. Whatever problems are actually experienced in the actual experience of living life, I assume secular humanists at least purport, more or less, to achieve that result. Perhaps in fact most agnostics do so.
But to say God's existence does not matter - I can't make any sense out of such a view.
I'm not saying it doesn't matter if God exists. Of course it does - that would change our entire existence!
What I mean is: I'm someone who's 99% sure that God doesn't exist. I won't know, nor will you, nor will anyone else, until death, and I'm not dead right now, so what should I care?
Well, that is not what you said in your previous post.
But to be clear i do not come to this thread primarily to discuss the general question of atheism's relation to the question of God's existence or non-existence. I am much more concerned about this great film, one of my all-time favorites. Carry on.
Honestly, I think it's sad to believe in nothingness. As humans, we have the gift of thinking in the abstract. Use it to gauge what you feel comes next, but I would say anyone who hasn't put thought into this is an utter fool.
I've actually spent restless nights trying to fathom how nothingness feels. I started thinking that the worst part of death is that you have nothing to look forward to. For example, if you got everything you ever wanted in an instant, you get no sense of gratification when something good happens.
Is that how nothingness feels? Man, that actually made my heart race, and I couldn't sleep the rest of the night. I was actually around 12 years old and thinking about that.
What kept me up all night as a child frequently, was the idea if infinity. If you focus on the impossibility of infinity (I saw it in terms of all that exists in the universe), then you can see something that has no end and no matter what opinion or theory you try to come up with an answer, infinity both exists absolutely, yet is absolutely impossible.
That is the closest I have ever come to being religious. I'm not an atheist, but I think organized religion is purely a creation of man and it bothers me that so many people kill, torture and hate for the sake of their religious belief.