I was totally taken by surprise by this edgy, brilliant movie. I was also mesmerized by the beautiful and fabulous Patricia Neal. My God, she just smoked in this movie. The great performance by Andy Griffith may have overshadowed her performance, but I will never forget the subtlety and vulnerability of her own performance. I have only seen Patricia Neal once before in Hud and thought she deserved her well-earned Oscar. But what the hell was the Academy of Motion Pictures thinking of by not even nominating Neal or Griffith for their performances in this film?
I agree totally. Checking on her and Griffith's birth dates they are the same age (She slightly older by a few months),and both still alive. They are the only part of the starring cast still living. Mattheau died in 2000. Franciosa in 2006 and Lee Remick in 1991.
I agree totally. Checking on her and Griffith's birth dates they are the same age (She slightly older by a few months),and both still alive. They are the only part of the starring cast still living. Mattheau died in 2000. Franciosa in 2006 and Lee Remick in 1991.
Not anymore now. Now Andy's gone (July 3, 2012). RIP Andy Griffith
I agree. She was amazing and compelling in this movie and the cinematography really captures her reactions. Such an expressive face! Andy Griffith's character and performance is somewhat over the top, although still worth seeing, especially as a change from the persona for which he is best known. The extent to which Schulberg's writing, Kazan's directing and Griffith's over-acting are "to blame" is debatable. Probably Kazan overdid it a bit. Anyway it's still a worthwhile performance, but Neal's reaction to Griffith's character is very important in making the picture watchable and was more interesting to me.
she was always great and this movie is no acception and incase you didn't know by the end of filming she was expecting her daughter Tessa who was born April 11th 1957
"why are you married to him then if you can't work with him how do you live with him?"
I agree with you on every count. When I saw the film, many years after becoming accustomed to Griffith from his television work, I couldn't believe that he was capable of such acting. He blew me away. And the late Neal? No words can describe her in EVERYTHING that she did. She was beyond brilliant in this film as she was in her entire body of work.
Glad there is a thread on the elegant, earthy, and sophisticated Patricia Neal here. I admittedly have not seen a lot of her films, but I loved her in this one- sort of a forerunner of Jane Craig from 'Broadcast News.' Stunning at her job as radio producer and jounalist, she probably stuns herself when she falls in love with her own mercurial creation- Andy Griffith's Lonesome Rhodes. Saw it again on 8/26 on TCM and recorded it so I can watch her breakdown in the control room again and again!!
it's on TCM again September 13th as part of a tribute to her as are the Fountainhead The Subject Was Roses and In Harms Way. if she had been nominated that year she'd have had no chance of winning and probably would've voted for her dear friend Joanne Woodward whom she Knew from the actors studio. who ended up winning that year
"why are you married to him then if you can't work with him how do you live with him?"
And what about that incredible look on her face as she stands at the hotel doorway and calls Lonesome back to her - as she realises she is going to finally give in to him and have sex. Sexy and soulful at the same time. I believe she had some tough times in her real life - I believe her career was halted for many years because of a crippling disease - polio - I think. She got over it went back into the movies in the 60s with films like In Harms Way. She ended up marrying writer Rauld Dahl.
She had a series of serious strokes that rendered her paralyzed and speechless for a while. I think her first film back was The Subject was Roses in 1967.
LEND AN EAR, I implore you, this comes from my heart: I'll always adore you, til death do us part.
Patricia knocked my socks off. I am used to seeing her only in films where she plays the cynical *beep!* who gets dumped like in Breakfast at Tiffany's. Here I completely believed her as the nice girl from a small Southern town and almost wanted to cast her as Nelle Harper Lee in a movie about her life.
ETA: Strike "almost". She'd have been perfect. And I wish she were still around.
I have always enjoyed Patricia Neal, as well. Be sure to watch her in "The Fountainhead" with Gary Cooper. NOTE: The movie was a very, very, very poor adaptation of a brilliant book; without Patricia Neal, the movie would not have been bearable. But, the casting of Patricia Neal as Dominique Francon was inspired, as she embodied the quintessential "perfect female." Ninety-nine people out of one hundred would suggest you watch HUD, so I will not belabor the obvious...enjoy. Let me know what you think.
Patricia was robbed by the Academy. The scene that gets me is when Lonesome leaves her after she's gone off on him about wanting something out of her devotion of him, and he offers her more money. He leaves, and she silently walks back toward her bed, then stops, and gives a groan of anguish that is still disturbing for me to hear. Terrific actress.
That little sound she makes is one of the things that keeps me coming back to this movie. So many other actresses would have over-sold it, but she kept it in perfect tune with her character. And it perfectly expressed her pain, and the character's need to cover it up with her competent efficient shell.