"Ikiru" (1952): 9/10.
"Tokyo Story" (1953): 8/10.
I've rated "Ikiru" higher, even though I think it has some pacing issues namely at the end of Act 2. There is plenty enough curveballs, interactions, and moments that make me really adore how they approached everything (That camera movement when the office man sits down in defeat behind his papers is great subtle emphasis).
Saying that, Kurosawa is my 3rd favourite director and I've yet to see more Ozu pictures. There's a history where Ozu and a young assistant had a discussion on how to film conversations with either both actors in frame, or looking at each other (Via. straight at the camera). They tested each methods and Ozu said "You see? No difference"!
It's some of the acting and that camera approach that really took me out of "Tokyo Story", granted I did enjoy the movie overall and that tear drop spoke a 1000 words. I can only respect its deserved spot in the history books and both are very wonderful postwar works that really hold up well. I look forward to seeing more of Ozu's work, and what did anyone else think? :)
reply
share