why does it wear a suit?


Explain! Why is a living carrot dressed in a spaceman suit? This kind of irresponsible, sloppy writing is what's wrong with these kind of movies! It completely ruined the entire film for me with this blatant irregard for logic.

reply

It's a modest carrot.

Just because I don't care doesn't mean I'm not listening.

reply

well, it IS an astro...uh...carrot?

uh...nevermind.

reply

Because carrots are living things too.

reply

That blatant "disregard" for logic comes from a film which has an alien creature akin to a living plant using human blood in earth-filled containers to grow offspring.

So what logic are you talking about? A science-fiction film tends to set up its own logic, so why wouldn't an intelligent creature, even one similar to a plant, be effected by cold weather to some degree or have some sort of moral compass that caused it to be clothed?

Remember, this is a 1951 movie with James Arness as a Frankenstein-like figure not wishing to run around naked, not a 1980s puppet-effect remake or modern CGI version. You're just ruining the movie for yourself, that's all.

-----
The Eyes of the City are Mine! Mother Pressman / Anguish (1987)

reply

...so why wouldn't an intelligent creature... ...have some sort of moral compass that caused it to be clothed?


"Morality" is a human concept. Since the Thing reproduces asexually ("neat and unconfused reproduction"), why would it ever have a sense that covering up would be appropriate - or 'moral'. And just exactly what would it be covering?

Besides, that was no suit: it was a uniform, methinks. It was implied that this dude was perhaps the first of many to come, so I'm thinking that this was a sort of army scout preparing the way for an invasion. Post WWII alertness still in evidence - and the urge to watch the skies! Keep looking... well, you know the rest!

Hi, Bob.

reply

The Thing From Another World is NOT a "carrot" - Klomak is a highly-evolved being of superior intelligence and limitless possibilities. The only ones who refer to Klomak as a "carrot" (or "super-carrot") are puny, brain-dead earth creatures!


SURRENDER, EARTHLINGS - YOUR WEAPONS ARE USELESS AGAINST US!!

reply

Perhaps there is no logic to it insofar as the story goes so I think it was just a cost cutting move on the part of the film makers.

I recall reading somewhere that the reason that the Metaluna Mutant from "This Island Earth" wore pants was because it was cheaper to do so than to make a full body suit!

reply

By the way, the suit in question also has a little emblem on the left (better seen in photo stills of James Arness in his creature make-up) that looks a lot like the RKO Pictures' logo!

reply

because in the 1950's,censorship was still a strong factor in film, and there is no way the movie boards would have approved a naked anything, even a carrot. We've come a long way, baby lol.

reply

Because generally it isn't a good idea to pilot a flying saucer without any protective clothing on. In fact, space travel without wearing any clothing is also a bad idea. The same applies to roaming about an alien planet like "The Thing" was doing. Apparently, "The Thing" has more common sense than you do.

reply

Plus, one has to remember that in the s.f. novella from which this was adapted ("Who Goes There?"), the hostile alien from space was a body-jumper. So, while not touched on in this JUSTLY-RENOWNED & UNDENIABLY BRILLIANT PIONEERING CLASSIC (probably due to budget constraints), it could be surmised that Arness' character was as much a prisoner of the true hostile alien as the scientists and soldiers, themselves.

reply

Jet pilots wear G-suits, and astronauts wear specialized clothing -- and neither has a thing to do with modesty.

Think: Protection, military uniform, retaining body heat, etc.

reply

It may also have worn a suit because there could have been tomatoes there and it wanted to make a good impression.



Hi, Bob.

reply

Um...a tomato is a fruit, so it would be a homosexual relationship.

reply

Um...a tomato is a fruit, so it would be a homosexual relationship.
Erm, most plant life are "hermaphrodite" (possessing both male and female sexual characteristics/organs)-- so it would have been a bisexual thing between bisexuals....


If you care enough to go around telling people you don't care... you obviously care.

reply

Because Edith Head was on salary.

reply

lol

p.s. So how many IMDb posters will get that reference? Two percent?

Kill all humans!

reply

Actually while the creature was "vegetable" in content, he was humanoid in physiognomy, so he was apparently a lot closer to us than the carrot that Scotty was blathering on about. He would wear clothes like we would for a variety of reasons...

Maybe he was modest ... and didn't want anybody to see his "thing" from another world.

http://www.woodywelch.com

reply

Maybe the humans actually over-estimated The Thing. I mean, considering how he attacked them head-on almost every time, it seemed that he was more inclined to rely on brute force and instinct.

Summary: "me hungry, me pounce on anything that moves."

reply

[deleted]

Tomatoes and Edith Head notwithstanding... It was frikkin' cold!!!

~LjM
Step on it! And don't spare the atoms!

reply

You are all going to vegetable hell for besmirching my carrot-leader. (smashes everything around, flails arms)

reply

You scare me NOT!!
{Reaching for my giant veggie peeler}


~LjM
Step on it! And don't spare the atoms!

reply

You are all going to vegetable hell for besmirching my carrot-leader.

Speaking of vegetable hell...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aoq_FEYuc48

Memory says, I did that. Pride replies, I could not have done that. Eventually, memory yields.

reply

Because Edith Head was on salary.
On salary, or on celery? ;-)

______
Joe Satriani - "Always With Me, Always With You"
https://y2u.be/VI57QHL6ge0

reply