MovieChat Forums > I Love Lucy (1951) Discussion > A Line that Makes No Sense

A Line that Makes No Sense


I've been watching the Hollywood episodes recently and there's a line by Lucy that makes no sense! Fred has bought a Cadillac and they are understandably excited about seeing it.

They are racing for the door and Little Ricky is of course, off somewhere with Mrs. Trumbull.

Lucy grabs her coat and says, "I hope the baby gets back in time to see the car."

That line is so silly on so many levels. First, "back in time" for what? Weren't they planning on keeping their new car? lol

And why would the baby be interested? If Little Ricky was sixteen I could understand him being excited that the family finally bought a car. He'd want to learn to drive it. But a baby?

My dad bought a new car when I was two. I don't recall my parents racing me out the door to see it!

I'm sure there are other lines that don't make too much sense. But that one always jumps out at me.

reply

Yeah, that is a bit dumb. And your comment about two year-old Little Ricky giving a hoot is also silly.

This reminds me of a film I just watched called "A Rainy Day in New York." Timothee Chalamet asks his ditzy girlfriend, played by Elle Fanning, if she's ever been to New York. She replies "twice - the first time when I was two, and the second time when I was twelve." Uh, hello!! Since she wouldn't RECALL the first visit, she's really only been there ONCE! It's a funny line, but in the case of ILL, the line isn't funny and doesn't make sense. One wonders if it was scripted differently, and Ball just screwed up the line.

I've never cared for Ethel's dropping by the Ricardos after some errand and catching Lucy about to mime that Ricky's bought her a mink stole. Ethel says, "I haven't got time for games, I've got to get my dinner on", then abruptly turns to leave 10 seconds after she just walked in, saying "Hi!" If she's in such a rush to get dinner started, WHY did she even bother to drop by in the first place?? Bad scripting.

reply

Your comment about being two years old reminds me of one of Lucy's reasons for wanting to go by car. It might be Little Ricky's "only" chance to cross the USA? Huh? Didn't Lucy think he'd have a chance to travel when he was an adult? Geez!! Also, did she really expect a toddler to take in all the sights and appreciate them??

Ethel's remark about having to rush to get her dinner on didn't make too much sense either.

Two sandwiches before lunch? Yeah, either Ethel was being sarcastic or she usually cooked a huge midday meal. Of course, in the washing machine episode, she was only serving cold cuts.

reply

>>> Uh, hello!! Since she wouldn't RECALL the first visit, she's really only been there ONCE!<<<<

Sorry, but this doesn't make any sense. She has been to New York twice. It is utterly irrelevant if she remembers or not. I haven't seen the film; if there is some detail that she's an orphan, and doesn't know her birth (or original adopted) parents and has no memory of anything before four or five, she wouldn't make the statement.

Given what you have quoted, she was in New York when she was two. She was undoubtedly told this by her parents. She was there. She was also there at twelve. Ipso facto, she has been in New York twice. She can only tell you about her memories of being there at twelve. She may be able to tell you something about being there at two if her parents told her about the visit.

Things don't undo themselves because you don't remember them. An amnesia victim's life events all happened whether they are remembered. (Yes, I know that that level of amnesia is rare.) Someone who has been in a traumatic auto accident and doesn't remember what happened from several minutes before (my wife had that experience) was still in the accident even if they don't remember it.

reply

You're a total ASS - you jump mid-thread into a topic which has ZERO to do with I Love Lucy to pound out several paragraphs (probably from your aging mother's basement) to lambast me about a comedic line, from a film you yourself admit you "haven't seen." Good f@#$ing grief!

Any idiot knows that if someone's been to NY twice it makes it twice! The wit (do you know the meaning of the word?) lies in the character's half-baked assertion that she consciously counts both visits to the big apple as legitimate recollections to discuss them as MEMORABLE separate trips.

Now that you stand corrected, kindly get lost and stop posting about films you've never seen.

reply

I responded to the post as written. I'm sorry you are so easily upset about it. You post said absolutely nothing about the character saying either or both visits were memorable.

Your quote says: >>>This reminds me of a film I just watched called "A Rainy Day in New York." Timothee Chalamet asks his ditzy girlfriend, played by Elle Fanning, if she's ever been to New York. She replies "twice - the first time when I was two, and the second time when I was twelve."

Please point out where the girlfriend, or Timothee Chalamet's character say anything about memorability. She is asked if she has ever BEEN to New York. She aswers, she has BEEN there twice, when 2 and 12 years old.

If you meant, or thought the characters meant, that the trips were memorable, then you should have said that. You quoted the film in reference to this topic. Don't be surprised when someone responds. I will always take a reference to another film/show as supplying enough information for the other readers to appreciate the comment. If you don't supply it, any misunderstandings are your issues.

reply

And just for your information, I moved out of my mother's house in 1981 when I got married. My wife and I have lived in our own home, which we own free and clear, for 40 years.

reply

Lol! Send your wife my condolences.

reply

She is quite happy, thank you. As am I.

reply

A line that never made sense to me:

I think they were in Lucy's apartment, and Fred is complaining about being hungry. Ethel says, "Oh come on, Fred; I'll make you a couple of sandwiches before lunch."

Who eats a couple of sandwiches before lunch." -- unless they're confined to bed because they weigh 900 pounds?

I always felt that Viv forgot her exact line and just threw that in -- but Gary disagreed.

A couple of sandwiches would be more than enough lunch for most people.

reply

I just think it was Ethel's attempt at sarcasm.

reply

There's another line in the second car episode that contradicts the line that I first brought up in the Cadillac episode. In the first episode, Lucy can't wait for the baby to see the car. In the second ep, he's in his room. But Lucy sends Ricky to get Mrs. Trumbull to babysit so they can go downstairs to see the new Pontiac.

So Little Ricky wasn't a "Pontiac man"? Even at that tender age, he had a preference for Cadillacs?

The second car episode was hilarious even though Lucy broke about a half dozen traffic laws. lol But her one response to Ethel makes no sense.
She gives Ethel confusing (and very funny) advice as to what to tell Ricky, Fred or the Cadillac man if one of them should wonder where the cars are.
Ethel says, "No, you stay here and tell that story and I'll drive the car."

Obviously she didn't mean it. But Lucy took her seriously and replied that Ethel "hadn't even soloed yet." So, neither had Lucy for that matter! She only drove one hour with Ricky.

reply