How can you NOT rate this as a 10?
Did you not rate this as 10? Why?
"The evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones."
Did you not rate this as 10? Why?
"The evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones."
I didn't rate it 10 because it has many flaws, such as:
1. Potter is a one-dimensional caricature. He's not the least bit believable as a real human being.
2. The film alleges mark twain is in Heaven even though mark twain hated God and Jesus Christ.
3. Mary is a tramp.
4. The film wastes a lot of screen-time on Mary's tramp sideplot, and then randomly drops it in the middle of the film, as if it never happened. Thus the film is left with a major storytelling incongruency/faux pas/error.
5. Mary being a lonely spinster in the alternate world makes no sense whatsoever, thus the film is left with a second major storytelling incongruency/faux pas/error.
6. The angels belittle Clarence, which is not something angels would do.
7. The film implies that God endorses killing people with war planes, which is not something that God would do.
8. George would still go to jail for the stolen money even if he replaced it with donations from the community, but the film implies otherwise.
9. The film glorifies vandalizing property, which is an immoral & dangerous message.
10. The guy who says "hee-haw" all the time is inherently annoying, easily one of the most obnoxious and useless characters ever put on film.
Come up with your own story line that is better. Or shut up.
shareHey Navaros, you are horrible.
shareI also rated it for more or less the same reasons you did, especially this part:
Mary being a lonely spinster in the alternate world makes no sense whatsoever, thus the film is left with a second major storytelling incongruency/faux pas/error.
George would still go to jail for the stolen money even if he replaced it with donations from the community, but the film implies otherwise.
Potter is not the least believable human being? is this like the biggest joke on the Internet ever made?
shareGeorge would still go to jail for the stolen money even if he replaced it with donations from the community, but the film implies otherwise.
No, in no place in this country would George "go to jail" for the stolen money. There is ample evidence that the money was lost, and not embezzled. And George wasn't even the one who lost it, as would quickly come out.
But there is little doubt the Board would insist that his uncle be permanently retired.
And by the way, Nav's list is complete and utter hogwash. I pity people like that.
1. You’ve obviously never worked in a corporate job, or if you have, fell into an incredibly privileged role with a rare mentor.
sharePotter was a based neocon before it was a thing.
shareI would sure hate to see what YOU think is an acceptable movie, then.
share[deleted]
"Because it's an over sentimental and overrated movie."
"I would sure hate to see what YOU think is an acceptable movie, then."
"I don`t know were(sic) i wrote that this movie is not acceptable.
Please show me were(sic) i wrote that this movie is not acceptable."
_________________________
"...over sentimental and overrated..." does seem, within the context of this message-board threadline topic question, to directly or indirectly imply at least some level of subjective unacceptability of this movie on your part.
That's where you wrote it.
God did not create man in his own image; man created god in his own image.
I seriously cannot believe this is a 94 on rotten tomatoes, who are these people that seriously think this is not a good movie
shareinflation.
🎄Season's Greetings!🎄
[deleted]