laughter in the dark
I'd seen this twice on my own, and watched it yesterday with a group of 60 years plus folk. There was considerable laughter at the "tough"lines, the overheated acting and the unfolding plot. Tom Neal's persistent sweatiness seemed a set up for seeing his character as ridiculous. Our brief discussion afterward seems to have been deflected from productive analysis by a shared sense of the absurdity of the movie. It seemed to be a parody of noir films more than an exemplar. Were we simply lazy or is it impossible to take this film seriously given our collective experiences of the neo-noir that came later?
share