MovieChat Forums > Saboteur (1942) Discussion > This has to be a joke...

This has to be a joke...


I'd heard about this as being off-the-wall even for Hitchcock. The plotting is absolutely ridiculous. To wit...Cummings swims away from cops while still handcuffed AFTER jumping off a bridge--Richard Kimble would be proud. Then, with fortune still looking over him...comes across a house owned by a blind man! Talk about lucky! But wait, the blind guy has some hyper sensitivity which allows him to judge a man's character simply by the way he talks. The blind man also knows Cummings has handcuffs on because...ummm, well he just does.
Later, Cummings manages to splice the handcuffs off...with the fan from a car
enginethat is still running. The same car by the way, which he drove from the passenger side--while still handcuffed and fighting off a woman. He's Macgyver!

Without getting into who got where and how (anybody who knows NYC would immediately see things as being logistically impossible) there's also the over-the-top patriotism.

At the time of filming, The US hadn't entered the war in Europe. Perhaps Hitchcock, whose native England was being bombed daily wanted to scare some Americans while still making them feel patriotic? That would account for the plot and the superpowers of Cummings. See? Even an average Joe can save the world from totalitarianism!!!

A truly bizarre film that should be put in a time capsule. After this, Hitchcock had to believe American audiences will fall for just about anything.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]


There are lots of interesting things in the film. I love the scene with Blind Man. I also like the scene where he jumps from the Bridge.

And I agree it is certainly underrated.

reply

I don't think there are any particularly glaring plot holes, nor palpable detraction from realism. It may be unlikely, but it's fiction. Everything that happens is still possible.

I thought it was superb. Not convinced by the ending, but it could've been a lot worse (e.g. Rear Window).

reply

One thing though - how come Kane couldn't grab Fry's hand at the end; only his sleeve?

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I just saw the film again last night and think its pretty damn brilliant, certainly as "film" the opening sequence alone has more oure film quality than all the modern "Armegedden" blow-up crap around today...

I also don't know of pretty much ANY script that can stand up to a thorough plot point review including "Gone With The Wind" "Casablanca" "Star Wars" or "I Spit On Your Grave" - and as several have pointed out there were answers to some of the original questions, but no one has mentioned what actually happened when he broke his cuffs...YES, he STARTED to try and use the fan to slice through them (even says he did later on) BUT after a few seconds the fan blade was not working and he switches to one of the drive belts, which more than likely would have worked given the belts at the time...so please all of you stop saying he used the fan to break his cuffs, he did not.

reply

Granted there are some hard-to-believe scenes in this film, but as Hitch would say: "It's only a mooovie".

reply

My goodness! So sorry that the USA entered the war, inspired to do so by the rise of totalitarianism and the threat it represented. And so sorry about that messy patriotism that inspired it all.

"Imagine I had placed into my IMDB signature a clever saying regarding people like you."

reply