Can someone delete this turd?
I mean this is a movie forum, the closest he ever came to the entertainment business was stealing a TV set.
shareThere are lots of pages for people who have nothing to do with movies. Why do you object to Floyd and not any of the murderers, dictators or politicians who have pages? And why do you feel it necessary to call him a "turd"?
shareI would object to anyone that popped up on the forum but had no ties to the entertainment industry. He is a turd because that was the most polite thing I could think of... would you prefer career criminal and complete waste of space? I think turd is less wordy and to the point.
shareI think you are a turd for not being able to express yourself in a way that doesn't warrant you being tossed in the toilet
share... and flushed.
shareFunny you didn't even bother to try and find anything with my comment that wasn't spot on true. Floyd was a waste of space and is doing more good now dead feeding worms than he would have ever done in his crime ridden life. Or do you support turds like Floyd that stick guns in the stomachs of pregnant women.
shareI am not focusing on your comment because someone with such a turd-like character has nothing of interest to me.
shareYou keep responding.. doesn't say much about you now does it. You hypocrite.
shareOf course you're not. Whacked out, brainwashed, leftists pawns like you, don't care about reality.
shareSubscribing to reality and reading about and adapting to facts are the foundation of Liberals/Progressives. You Right-wing nuts use lies and fake trolls, along with Russian and Chinese disinformationalists to attack change because you want to turn back the clock ... and for what? To help wealthy oligarchs completely take over the government? How does that help you? How does that help America.
You guys are the ones who pick out these wacko websites with fake news and post them, and then you all show up and lies and attack anyone who asks reasonable questions or points out problems with these fake stories. One after the other, every day of the year.
I have to disagree with the part about him doing more good dead than alive. Due to his death, cities have pretty much burned down and numerous people have lost their lives (and apparently their ability to think critically). All over a Life of Brian-level of misguided deification of a nobody. If he'd lived, the worst that likely would've come of it is a few people would've probably ended up being robbed or, at worst, there'd only have been a small handful of assaults before he was placed back in jail once again (or overdosed in a less up for interpretation manner).
As for his inclusion on this website, I'd say that while it sucks that someone such as him (a criminal who did nothing to warrant his adulation) would get this type of recognition (let alone praise), since he IS included in a growing number of documentaries and such it actually does make sense for him being here.
You presume he was instrumental in the BLM riots, I would suggest that they were already going to happen, whether because the police killed this turd or killed some other black man a few days later. And in either case I don't think it would have mattered if they shot a truly innocent man or one that was about to gun down a school yard full of kids. The BLM trash was looking for an excuse and this was the first person that died the day they were looking. It is very reminiscent of the black gang banger thug that was killed in St Louis a few years back and the media and outsiders were wetting themselves to protest it... but when they actually talked to people that lived in the projects with the worthless turd, none of them were upset, they were all happy he was gone because he had been terrorizing them for years.
shareYou're right, his page should stay. Especially when there are pages for dictators and such. But he's a turd because he was a criminal who went to jail 8 times.
shareWhy does that make someone a “turd”? Did you personally know him? No? Then STFU
sharePeople can call other people "turd" as they want. Here, I'll say Trump is turd. No need to STFU.
shareWrong. It’s called slander and libel.
shareWell, sue me.
shareYou don't even know what slander and libel are do you turd?
shareThanks for providing an example
shareYou proved my point again. You don't know what slander and libel are. I can call you a turd all day long, and it isn't slander or libel. To be slander or libel someone has to call you something that you can prove to be false. TURD is descriptive of what you are but it has no definitive definition when applied to a person so cannot be considered slander or libel. If someone would call you an illegitimate bastard you could easily prove you weren't a bastard with a birth certificate. if someone said you were an adulter fucking your neighbor you could get your neighbor to testify that he had not fucked you or ever been fucked by you... In those two examples someone could claim slander or libel... but if someone calls someone stupid, a turd, an asshat, or any other number of descriptive but undefined things which are a matter of opinion and not fact...well you just have to suck it.
shareWrong again. You are accusing other people of being composed of fecal matter in an attempt to defame them and destroy their reputation. You have also attempted to prove me wrong despite the fact that I am clearly right. This has been published publicly and viewed by multiple third parties. Under tort law I could file a civil suit for publishing such slanderous accusations. In addition, equating a black man to a turd is considered racist. So you have multiple things going against you. I’ll see you in court.
shareMy god you are more ignorant that I thought. Even that dried up cunt Judge Judy would laugh in your face.
shareI don't personally know Hitler but that doesn't mean he's not a turd. Being in jail 8 times makes George Floyd a turd. I don't think he deserved to die, but I'm not going to push aside the bad things he's done.
shareHe didn’t “go to jail 8 times,” he was convicted of 8 crimes. He spent four years in prison for it. I’ve had family members go to prison for years as well, but I don’t refer to them as “turds” or compare them to Hitler.
shareAs the far rightists like to constantly point out ( which is why you see him on the site all the time) he robbed a pregnant woman by pointing a gun at her belly.
That makes him a turd,
and i doubt the other 7 crimes will make that diagnosis any better.
What did your family members do?
We could let you know if they're turds as well as you dont seem to be able to spot one.
He never actually did that, that was debunked and is just propaganda spread by alt-right trolls, so I’m just going to ignore all your points from now on seeing as you’re gullible enough to fall for any old lie.
share"Debunked!"
lol pathetic
ok , ive read up on Snopes.
she wasnt pregnant
Still , an armed home invasion , with 5 other turds , still makes him a turd.
Sometimes people have understandable reasons for getting roped into crimes. Maybe he needed money for food or to help his family. We don’t know why. He served his prison time, he atoned for his crimes. He then worked for a local pastor and church, and even made anti-violence videos to spread to youths. He helped out at charities. We’re all human and make mistakes, here was a man who tried to be a better person and was instead murdered by some loser cop who already had a past history with him.
shareAt the time of his death, the coroner ruled he had various drugs in his system. He was about to drive home which if he was pulled over, would have been a DUI. Stop trying to make it sound like the guy turned his life around.
The cop is still a loser though.
Again, most of those are debunked claims. It was never proven he was preparing to drive. The toxicology results were exaggerated. Also who gives a f-ck what drugs are in his system? Most of the people you’ll see walking around on the street are also on drugs (yes, that includes white people). Most people are on some kind of prescription meds or high on THC.
shareMaking excuses for criminal behavior, I see.
He was behind the wheel of the car when the cops stopped him. The coroner said he had drugs in his system, but they weren't a factor in his death.
He was sitting in a car with friends. That does not indicate he was driving. But even if he was, so what? That wasn’t why he was assaulted by police. He was accused of a crime with no evidence and the attacked by police for no reason.
So
You’re making excuses for police misconduct and brutality.
No I'm not. You said that he was turning his life around. I'm telling you that he had drugs in his system and was about to drive home.
How does that mean I'm sending him being killed by a cop?
He wasn’t driving, he was sitting in the car with friends. The toxicology report is ultimately meaningless. Plenty of people take painkillers.
End of the day.
, he was an innocent man.
Learn the law:
A person can be charged with drinking and driving if they have “care and control” of their vehicle, whether they are actually driving their car, or just sitting in the driver’s seat with the engine turned off. Under the law, an individual could even be sleeping and still be charged with a drinking and driving offence.
https://bruceengel.com/2016/02/can-i-be-charged-with-drunk-driving-for-sitting-in-my-vehicle/#:~:text=A%20person%20can%20be%20charged,with%20the%20engine%20turned%20off.&text=This%20may%20sound%20harsh%2C%20but,designed%20to%20prevent%20drunk%20driving. share
He wasn’t drinking and driving dude, lol, get a grip
shareThe law says he can still be charged.
shareA charge without basis. Also there was no reason to pull their guns on him.
shareAgain, pulling their guns out is a different argument. You mentioned how he was changing his life around. I'm not arguing on whether or not he deserved to die.
shareHis life was changed for the better. He was attacked based on trumped up charges with little basis. Apparently according to you it’s okay to go around assaulting people, pulling them out of their cars, and crushing their throat with your knee because they have prescription drugs in their system? You’d be right at home in North Korea or some Third World Banana Republic. Because evidently you HATE the constitution and all it stands for.
Did I mention he wasn’t drinking? The officer had NO probable cause to intimate an arrest.
Have you even read what I wrote? I never claimed that George Floyd deserved to die. You said that he wasn't a turd and I gave you reasons why he is one. That doesn't mean I think he deserved to die.
shareYou claimed he was drinking and driving. He never was. The officer had no reasonable suspicion to deduce he was drunk. It’s a bogus charge man. Get over it
shareI never said he was drinking and driving. I said that the coroner ruled that he had drugs in his system at the time of his death. He was behind the wheel of his car. That is illegal and I showed you proof. Just because you don't like the law that doesn't mean it isn't true. He was the one who drove to the store where the $20 incident happened so that means he had already driven while under the influence of drugs.
shareA person can be charged with drinking and driving if they have “care and control” of their vehicle
I hate that law.
Wheres the line drawn exactly?
I have complete control of my car now - I'm in the house and car locked in garage - keys in my pocket.
not near the line?
how about if i go and unlock it?
are we near the line now?
I opened the drivers door - am i drunk driving yet?
which seats can i safely sit in?
I don't like it either. I think it should only be if the engine is on.
shareI've heard tales of people people getting arrested for DUI at their homes if the hood of their car was warm.
sharedegray9 wrote:
"He was accused of a crime with no evidence"
Bullshit. The accusation from the witness who took his phony bill most certainly qualifies as evidence. Eyewitness testimony no longer qualifies as evidence according to you, eh?
Another trumped up charge. You can only be charged with a crime for producing counterfeit money. Not merely
Having it in your possession.
degray9 wrote:
"Another trumped up charge. You can only be charged with a crime for producing counterfeit money. Not merely
Having it in your possession."
More bullshit from the George Floyd fan club. It's a federal crime to pass counterfeit money with the intent to defraud. Whether the intent was there is what's often litigated. Floyd used the counterfeit bill and was therefore subject to a federal charge.
Utterly ridiculous. How does anyone know of someone’s “intent” with $20? Have you ever worked retail before? Cashiers have special pens they use to tell if a bill is fake. If it was fake, then why didn’t the cashier check it BEFORE he accepted it? Did it ever occur to you that Floyd didn’t know it was counterfeit? You don’t just call the police every time someone pays with a fake bill.
share"How does anyone know of someone’s “intent” with $20?"
That's why the USA has these things called "trials," genius. If authorities want to get to the origins of counterfeit bills then a good place to start is with the person who passed it. Duh.
Like I said, being arrested for accidentally having a counterfeit bill in your wallet is idiotic. I’ve never called the police on anyone with a counterfeit bill. So I guess the real villain is the idiot gas station clerk.
shareDidn't you see the scandal of Snopes? They have the legitimacy of rug rat squirts out of welfare mothers crotch. The guy behind Snopes has been plagiarizing crap without actually looking for any proof of something... basically just parroting the liberal bullshit of the mainstream media. In this instance the snopes hoaxers use the fact that the police report of the crime doesn't state that she was pregnant, it states he put a gun to her stomach but didn't say if she was or wasn't pregnant. The fact that a police report doesn't state one way or the other neither proves nor disproves the claim that he put a gun to a pregnant woman's stomach. Unless someone goes and finds the victim and asks if she was or was not pregnant when she was robbed there is no way to disprove this based solely a brief police report of a crime. Pregnant women are victimized all the time, sometimes completely unaware they are pregnant.. but they don't normally go telling the police they are pregnant or not.
shareI didn't compare him to Hitler. You said I couldn't make the judgement if he was a turd or not because I didn't know him personally. I don't know Hitler but he's still a turd.
According to Wikipedia:
Between 1997 and 2005, Floyd served eight jail terms on various charges, including drug possession, theft, and trespass.[1
Source from the Wikipedia page: https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/06/12/george-floyd-criminal-record/
He spent 6 months in jail.
Then another 10 months. Another 15 days 3 years later. He then spent another 30 months in jail for various cocaine charges. Then he received more jail time for his aggravated assualt charge in 2007.
Just because you don't refer to your relatives as turds, that doesn't mean you're not giving them an easy pass. share
Do you have any idea how the justice system works? Most of those are trumped up charges. One of them was literally “refusing to comply with an officer” when he was questioned for having committed no crime. THAT is a violation of his civil liberties. Just because someone is poor enough to be unable to fight trumped up charges in court from predatory police doesn’t make someone a “turd.”
Also he was never charged with “aggravated assault.” He was charged with armed robbery. I’d suggest you at least get the facts right. Did I mention he was picked out of a lineup by a 7 year old? For all we knew he was just the getaway driver who got roped into this without knowing the full extent of what was going to happen. Sometimes it helps to see things from different angles so you get the full story kid.
That seems like a lot of excuses.
The article says it is unclear what he did when he refused to give him information to police. There's no way for you to know he didn't do anything wrong.
He was charged with Aggravated Robbery specifically.
They’re called reasons. You don’t know the reasons. You’re just fishing for excuses to justify him being killed for some reason. Pretty sociopathic.
If it’s unclear what he did, then why was he being questioned by police? Did it ever occur to you that police frequently break the law by questioning people and demanding ID when they’ve done nothing wrong? Police are the biggest criminal gang out there.
But at least you got the charges right.
Did it ever occur to you that police frequently break the law by questioning people and demanding ID when they’ve done nothing wrong?
Man: "Are you okay?
Altar boy: "yeah, why?"
Man: "Well you're an altar boy and have probably been molested by a priest because so many of them do it."
Altar boy: "No, I haven't."
Man: "Are you sure? Priests are a bunch of pedophiles." share
You’re close, but the analogy is off.
Replace the characters with a policeman questioning a black man and demanding ID because he wants to fish for warrants, and you’d be closer to the mark.
That's hearsay. You don't know the police officer's intention.
shareYes I do. Police demand people’s ID so they can search for warrants and log them in the system in case they show up again. What you don’t realize is that it’s unconstitutional. I guess folks like you just hate our rights?
shareI didn't say the police in general. I said you don't know why the cop arrested George Floyd when he failed to provide his name.
shareRegardless, it’s an illegal arrest.
shareYou don't know what was said to him. Again, hearsay.
shareIt’s called basic logic. If it’s unclear exactly why the police stopped him, then why are they stopping him? Minnesota is not a stop and ID state. The police cannot detain you unless you’ve committed a crime. If there’s no crime, then it was an illegal detention. End of.
shareJust because it's unclear, that doesn't mean nothing happened.
shareYou're right. Turd is way to good of a word for someone who held a gun to a pregnant woman's belly.
share