MovieChat Forums > Naomi Watts Discussion > WTF Happened to NAOMI WATTS?

WTF Happened to NAOMI WATTS?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mR-IX2LZgZY

Naomi Watts is widely considered one of the best actresses of her generation. Born in England but raised in Australia, Watts is a contemporary of close friend Nicole Kidman and made her American debut in the cult film Tank Girl. She broke out after starring in David Lynch’s Mulholland Drive, which began life as a TV pilot before being reshot and re-edited into one of the most acclaimed films of the 2000s. From there, stardom was a given, with her becoming extremely bankable after playing the lead in Gore Verbinski’s The Ring and the sequel, The Ring 2.

Many widely acclaimed roles followed, with her starring in Peter Jackson’s mega-budget remake of King Kong (2005). She also starred in David Cronenberg’s Eastern Promises, Birdman, St. Vincent, and J. A Bayona’s underseen The Impossible, which proved to be a breakout role for a young Tom Holland.

However, in recent years Watts’ big-screen output has become lower-key, with her seemingly opting to focus on TV (her series Gypsy lasted a single season on Netflix), with her initially set to star in HBO’s abandoned Game of Thrones prequel. She’s kept busy making smaller films, such as Philip Noyce’s Lakewood, Luce and This is the Night, as well as a turn in Joe Carnahan’s Boss Level, but we here at JoBlo Originals think Watts is one of the best in the business and should be treated as the icon she is.

reply

NothingTF happened to her. She’s still working and is well respected and admired.

Stop being such a drama queen TMZdude

reply

Why Does Naomi Watts Keep Getting Employed?

https://www.datalounge.com/thread/29953376-why-does-naomi-watts-keep-getting-employed-

She's talented "enough" and she's pretty "enough" and her asking price is low "enough" and so she gets work that is turned down by more popular actresses or when they can't afford one.

Eva Marie Saint is a good comparison.

by Anonymous reply 3 December 24, 2021 10:32 PM

She was very good in a film I saw a few years back about the tsunami in India. I think her “problem” is she’s sort of a B+ at everything: she’s a good actress, just not a great one, very pretty but not strikingly beautiful, she works regularly but doesn’t put the hustle in for fame that some other actors do, etc. But as a result she makes a good living, has a family and time for them, doesn’t get swarmed by the press, so maybe she’s the smart one!

by Anonymous reply 34 December 29, 2021 2:05 PM


https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Naomi-Watts-not-a-big-star-anymore-What-happened

https://www.tracking-board.com/career-therapist-whats-going-on-with-naomi-watts/

https://www.pajiba.com/career_assessments/naomi-watts-career-assessment-blank-slate-or-newly-bland-actress.php

https://filmschoolrejects.com/naomi-watts-comeback/

reply

🥱😴

reply

Lol, you're delusional.

reply

Well she plowed right into her 50s for starters. I think she broke out a little too late. Hot blonde leading ladies kind of went out of style. And certainly she was losing roles to Nicole Kidman there. Now you got fresh faces like Margot Robbie gobbling up the parts. Just no more room for Watts.

reply

https://www.datalounge.com/thread/30622903-naomi-watts

I agree she is very talented, but her range is limited, more limited than most of the actresses you mention, R2. (But not all: She would have brought more depth and warmth to Gilded Age than Carrie Coon.)

She broke out in Hollywood playing an ingenue (Betty in Mulholland Drive) and she still has that look.

There aren't too many parts for that type at age 53. Witness her being cast as Babe Paley in the second season of Feud.

It's also possible she has bad representation and/or not the best taste in material. She or her team really have picked a lot of lousy scripts.


by Anonymous reply 5 April 11, 2022 6:14 AM

reply

She's getting work but yeah there's no longer the buzz that used to be associated with her. Up until around 2018, it seemed like she was everywhere. LUCE (2019) was good though.

reply

Naomi Watts Deserves Better

https://www.pajiba.com/celebrities_are_better_than_you/naomi-watts-deserves-better.php

Since then, I’ve been an eager fan of Watts. She’s one of the few actors working today whose career I have a curious personal investment in. That’s a difficult situation for any person given that no actor, regardless of talent and opportunity, has a perfect filmography to their name. Everyone has flops, failed chances, and big swings that simply missed the mark. Even Daniel Day-Lewis did Nine. Watts, sadly, doesn’t seem to be doing the kinds of projects I and many others think she is capable and deserving of. It’s almost a joke to some, with many in Film Twitter circles seeing her as the recipient of Nicole Kidman’s cast-offs (the pair are actually good friends.)

Watts always seems to sign onto the ‘right’ project, at least on paper. She’s worked with notable directors, often in their follow-ups to breakout work, where the hype is at its peak. She landed the leading female role in Peter Jackson’s much-anticipated remake of King Kong, which performed solidly but wasn’t exactly elevated to masterpiece status. Ideas that seem right in theory, like a biopic of Princess Diana, fall apart in execution. Blockbuster darling Colin Trevorrow cast her in his return to his indie roots… but that film was The Book of Henry. For every acclaimed experience with a beloved auteur at the top of their game — David Cronenberg’s Eastern Promises — there are as many misfires — Gus Van Sant’s Sea of Trees, Clint Eastwood’s J. Edgar. Yet there’s this sense among many film lovers that Watts’ career is in irreparable shape, even when her acting is acclaimed and moments of quiet brilliance, such as the drama Luce, sneak up on us.

reply

Diana

reply

Bingo.

reply