Amazon’s Alexa has been claiming the 2020 election was stolen - Donald Trump Discussion

[–] JoWilli (20275) a year ago

investigate the mules!

reply

[–] Pete314 (3040) a year ago

"These responses were errors that were delivered a small number of times, and quickly fixed when brought to our attention,” Amazon spokeswoman Lauren Raemhild said in a statement. “We continually audit and improve the systems we have in place for detecting and blocking inaccurate content.”

Isn't that always what censors do?

reply

[–] Bubbathegut (18094) a year ago

Only Liberal censors.

reply

[–] moviechatterer (15787) a year ago

Donald's daily repeated bullshit , amplified by 50 million mindless drones has gained enough traction to accidentally get reported as a real thing by a simple news reading machine.

reply

[–] Bubbathegut (18094) a year ago

Over 100 million still think that Russia hacked the 2016 election.

There was no official investigation of the 2020 election. Even though Joe said he would lose by chicanery and Nancy said that Trump was going to steal the election again.

reply

[–] BKB (10096) a year ago

Perhaps when there are 50 Million mindless drones as you put it amplified by this, then maybe, just maybe there's some truth to it which is why he's so far ahead in the Polls over Biden and the other 4 contestants from last nights debate??

reply

[–] KBiker (1019) a year ago

Do you actually believe "Donald's daily repeated bullshit," or do you just not care?

reply

[–] tvfan (12969) a year ago

Do you actually believe "propaganda and fake news" or do you just not care?

reply

[–] Pete314 (3040) a year ago

Honestly, do you really think that someone believes in the bs you're posting here all the time?

reply

[–] moviechatterer (15787) a year ago

you and tvfan sound as crazy as flat earthers

Every newspaper in the world prefixes quotes of Donald's fixed election claims with

"And Trump once again wrongly asserted that..."

Every newspaper in the world

to believe that some Trump opponent has managed to make Every newspaper in the world go along with some anti trump false narrative covering up a fixed election is ... well its beyond crazy.

you make the flat earthers sound reasonable

reply

[–] Pete314 (3040) a year ago

EVERY newspaper in the world

See? I caught you lying. What to think now of the rest of your statement? And why do you answer instead of "Kbiker"? One of your sock accounts?

You say what? Oh, wait, I give a shit..

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5468) a year ago

Fake electors in Wisconsin first to admit Biden won election and face penalty.

[–] BKB (2298) an hour ago
Perhaps when there are 50 Million mindless drones as you put it amplified by this, then maybe, just maybe there's some truth to it which is why he's so far ahead in the Polls over Biden and the other 4 contestants from last nights debate??

Six Republicans who cast fake electoral votes for Donald Trump in Nevada in 2020 were charged with two felonies each by the state’s attorney general on Wednesday.

Privacy booths seen at a voting site in Tripp Commons at the University of Wisconsin-Madison campus on 3 November 2020.

Fake electors in Wisconsin first to admit Biden won election and face penalty.

The Democratic attorney general, Aaron Ford, announced the charges, saying a grand jury had decided to charge the six fake electors with “offering a false instrument for filing” and “uttering a forged instrument” for sending documents claiming to be the state’s electors.

Fake electors in Georgia and Michigan have already been charged, while others of the seven states with similar schemes are still investigating the issue. A separate civil lawsuit in Wisconsin over the fake electors settled this week, with the Republicans who claimed Trump won the state acknowledging Biden’s victory and agreeing not to serve as electors next year.

reply

[–] tvfan (12969) a year ago

Those charges are for optics and to flush out traitors.

Alternate electors are neither new nor illegal as they have been used since 2000, eg. "Bush v. Gore", and Podesta had an alternate electors plan setup in case their rigging failed in 2020.

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5468) a year ago

[–] tvfan (4777) a minute ago
Those charges are for optics and to flush out traitors.

Traitors to the Constitution? Yes. Replace "Flush out" with "Hold Accountable" and then you are spot on. 👍

Alternate electors are neither new nor illegal as they have been used since 2000, eg. "Bush v. Gore",

Problem is that your Non-Precedent example failed because of Secrecy, Recounts, and (here's the BIG one) False Allegations of Fraud. The Courts had ruled that there was no fraud and the recount was verified. The submission of Fake Electors, Alternate Electors, Contingent Electors, Phony Electors, Bogus Electors thus became a Federally Fraudulent endeavor and Chesbero knew that and submitted them AFTER the courts had ruled.

and Podesta had an alternate electors plan setup in case their rigging failed in 2020.

Cool Story Bro.

No amount of "What-Aboutism" will change the fate of the allegedly contested states and their Fake Elector Schemes.

reply

[–] tvfan (12969) a year ago

Traitors to Trump and "we the people", keep up.

The Courts had ruled that there was no fraud and the recount was verified.

Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 31 decided on the merits, and of those 31, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 23 of them.

No amount of "What-Aboutism" will change the fate of the allegedly contested states and their Fake Elector Schemes.

Podesta had an alternate electors plan in 2016 and 2020.
For once, try doing some research outside of your usual fake-news and propaganda sources.

reply

[–] moviechatterer (15787) a year ago

just maybe there's some truth to it

no! thats your inner Donald talking

Mindlessly denying reality and repeating a fantasy in the hope that that alone will make it come true is the move of an underdeveloped infant mind like Donald's , or an infant's

reply

[–] tvfan (12969) a year ago

Do you honestly believe that an establishment that is guilty of a coup and owns/controls MSM will admit it?

reply

[–] moviechatterer (15787) a year ago

see the my other comment above (to pete) about how ludicrous your belief that " owns/controls MSM " is.

reply

[–] tvfan (12969) a year ago

You said "every newspaper"...no one claimed that except you.

There are sources outside of MSM that are not controlled/owned by the establishment/DS that say the opposite but brainwashed NPCs consider them non-credible and/or FN because google told them.

Oh, btw, google is also controlled by the left and the establishment. Research it and you will see that they pushed votes to/for the Dems.

reply

[–] JoWilli (20275) 4 months ago

investigate ! lol

reply

[–] Bubbathegut (18094) a year ago

Still waiting for those cold hard facts! lol

reply

[–] tvfan (12969) a year ago

Of course it has, the whole world knows it was stolen, including AI.

reply

[–] AmeriGirl26 (14486) 4 months ago

I thought devices like Alexa were programmed by left-wingers, why would she be speaking out against the Groupthink?

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

Trump lost over 60 court cases during his attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, many of them presided over by judges appointed by Republicans or even Trump himself. Not one found sufficient evidence of fraud that could have conceivably overturned the results in one single state, much less the multiple states Trump would have needed to overcome Joe Biden’s electoral college vote majority. Also, let's not forget that Trump's BFF Rudy Giuliani himself straight up said he doesn't have any evidence of election fraud.

Trump himself hired two cybersecurity companies, Simpatico Security Systems and Berkeley Research Group, specifically to find evidence the election was stolen. After extensive investigations they both reported back to Trump that there was NO EVIDENCE the election was stolen. It wasn't what he wanted to hear so he conveniently ignores these findings when continuing to lie about a stolen election only he tried to steal.

Also, Trump keeps claiming he has “irrefutable evidence” but keeps refusing to show said evidence. What’s the hold up? Why hasn’t he shown it yet?

Another thing, can you Trump supporters please explain how they "rigged" the presidential election, but still elected republicans to the House in 2020 ON THE SAME BALLOTS?! The fact is that tens of thousands of voters in swing states split their ballots. They either left the presidential section blank, or voted Biden, and down ballot they voted republican for congress, for State Executive Officers or for State Legislatures. Take Georgia for instance.....TWENTY-EIGHT THOUSAND voters voted republican all down the ballot but voted Biden or ignored the presidential election. Republican congressmen got 33,000 more votes than Trump! And look at Wisconsin....Trump lagged Wisconsin’s five GOP congressmen by 63,547. Were they FRAUDULENT VOTES?

reply

[–] robocat893 (15963) 4 months ago

Trump, Giuliani, The Pillow Dude and all of Trump's supporters claim that the 2020 election was rigged. What I don't understand is why none of those people have provided any evidence to support their claims. What are they waiting for?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

They did, but all the evidence was rejected by the corrupt USA Justice system which works for the WEF and wanted to get rid of Trump

reply

[–] robocat893 (15963) 4 months ago

That is absolute bullshit and you know it you simple minded retard. If anyone had proof of the 2020 election being rigged it would be the number one news story for weeks. Why do you worship a 34 times convicted felon who is way too old to be president with his dementia getting worse by the day? Maybe you can scream MAGA 2032 after Harris' finishes her two terms as president.

Just think. If you MAGAs picked a younger, smarter and educated candidate for president then you probably would have won in November. Now you're stuck a dementia patient who will never be president again. Sorry for you, sucker!

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

So you're saying that the republican judges that Trump himself appointed suddenly were in on the conspiracy against him? Is that seriously what you're saying?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Yes, obviously they weren't working for Trump, even if they were appointed by him.

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

Do you know how fucking ridiculous you sound?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Haha. This is very funny because you are the one Who Will be saying there is fraud when Trump wins again this november 😉

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

No seriously, do you know how ridiculous you sound?

So you're telling me that the republican judges that Trump himself appointed decided to turn against Trump for........no reason? Oh wait, maybe the evil democrats bribed them! Is that it?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Yes, like Mike Pence, he didn't choose well his allies. It's fascinating how brainwashed NPCs like you jump like pushed for a spring each time someone says there was fraud in 2020. I don't understand what do you care, If I am a freak lying. Maybe you are afraid that idea can contaminate someone? Which is absurd, as that's a crazy claim, isn't it?

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

Brainwashed? You wanna talk about brainwashed? You probably watched the 2000 Mules documentary and believed everything you saw in it without even bothering to research if anything in it was accurate. And why? Cause you're very gullible.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

No, I simply watch reality and take my own conclusions, a thing clearly you can't do.

I don't even like Trump very much, but it's obvious there was fraud against him.

reply

[–] robocat893 (15963) 4 months ago

What obvious fraud is that? Be specific. Be sure to provide evidence for your claims so you don't look stupid if that's even possible.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

One week to count all the votes, millions of votes for Biden appearing from nowhere, dozens of videos of fraud in electoral colleges.... Please.

reply

[–] robocat893 (15963) 4 months ago

OK, stupid. Now provide links that backup your claims. Even a simple Trump worshiper like you should be able to do that.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/mail-ballot-fraud-study-finds-trump-almost-certainly-won-2020

The fraud was made using the mail in-ballots, are you Happy now?

Why do you care so much about a "freak" like me saying there was fraud? Maybe you are afraid I may convince someone?

reply

[–] robocat893 (15963) 4 months ago

That's your proof that the 2020 election was rigged? 🤣Holy fuck! You are the stupidist user here. I knew it! I'm sure your wife/sister and the rest of your inbred family is embarrassed of you.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

I also Saw the mail in ballot fraud happening in real time, btw. I can identify when fraud IS happening, because It has happened in other countries, and demócrats weren't so subtle doing It anyway

reply

[–] robocat893 (15963) 4 months ago

Bullshit. I'm done with you. I can only take so much stupid and you are very stupid.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Let's Hope this is true. It looks you leftists can't avoid jump in panic every time someone mentions the truth about the 2020 fraud.

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

Surely those videos would be the most watched, most controversial and most damming thing ever if it were even remotely true that there were even half a dozen videos proving the election was stolen.

Surely they would be getting played non-stop, instead of us just hearing lazy insinuation after lazy insinuation that the videos are out there, somewhere.

It's like me seeing video of a delivery truck at the store across the road from me and saying there's evidence of bread fraud.

reply

[–] robocat893 (15963) 4 months ago

According to you the Democrats outsmarted all you Republicans by rigging the 2020 election. Thousands if not millions of co-conspirators worked together across state lines without getting caught or having a single problem. Not one. Knowing human behavior that's impossible. Why hasn't one single person involved come forward as a whistle blower to prove that Trump won 2020? Where is the evidence that Trump, Giuliani and the Pillow Dude claim they have that the 2020 election was rigged? Why haven't they released anything?

When Trump loses again are you going to say that the 2024 election is rigged, Cupcake?

reply

[–] itsbananas2024 (1837) 4 months ago

[–] robocat893 (15021) 3 minutes ago
According to you the Democrats outsmarted all you Republicans by rigging the 2020 election. Thousands if not millions of co-conspirators worked together across state lines without getting caught or having a single problem. Not one.

Do you have this saved on MS Stickynotes™ ?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

It looks he has xd

It's funny how these NPCs jump in panic everytime someone says "fraud"!

reply

[–] robocat893 (15963) 4 months ago

The only panic I see is when you see Harris destroying Trump. Here's the latest polls. I know you will scream fake poll but it's not. Remember, you believed in these polls when Trump was ahead.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Just in your dreams, because this time, without COVID and mail in ballots, making fraud won't be so easy 😉

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/internal-harris-polling-much-less-rosy-public-polls-super-pac-founder

Harris doesn't have any opportunity. For God's sake, she is a retarded communist who can't even speak in public, nobody wants that as a president.

reply

[–] robocat893 (15963) 4 months ago

Holy fuck! You are so stupid. I know you're upset that your orange master is crashing and burning right before your eyes but Harris is leading in almost every poll. Show me where Trump is leading in the polls. Harris has no problem speaking in public and you know this.

Have you seen Trump lately? He's not doing well.

Watch this video that shows Trump's cognitive decline. I dare you. He babbled for so long even Fox News Entertainment cut him off. 🤣

https://youtu.be/PWUoWxwXQV4?si=kYLNBpWd6sI0urSb

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

I know you are a fanatic who would vote for a sweaty sock tied to a stick before Trump, but thankfully not all americans are like you :)

reply

[–] robocat893 (15963) 4 months ago

Most Americans hate Trump and Harris will destroy Trump in November. Trump has no path to be president due to his dementia and because he is a 34 times convicted felon.

Have you seen Trump lately? He's not doing well.

Watch this video that shows Trump's cognitive decline. I dare you. He babbled for so long even Fox News Entertainment cut him off. 🤣

https://youtu.be/PWUoWxwXQV4?si=kYLNBpWd6sI0urSb

Show me where Trump is leading in the polls, Cletus.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

"I don't even like Trump very much" LOL sure you don't. You're fooling nobody. You're obviously a redcap.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

[deleted]

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

[deleted]

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Please, we all Saw the fraud happening in real time, why you repeat and repeat there wasn't fraud? 🤦

reply

[–] robocat893 (15963) 4 months ago

According to you the Democrats outsmarted all you Republicans by rigging the 2020 election. Thousands if not millions of co-conspirators worked together across state lines without getting caught or having a single problem. Not one. Knowing human behavior that's impossible. Why hasn't one single person involved come forward as a whistle blower to prove that Trump won 2020? When Trump loses again are you going to say that the 2024 election is rigged?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Well there were dozens of videos and testimonies of It. And of course, demócrats are working to steal the elections again, fortunately with the new ID mandatory identification rule ( that dems desperately tried to block) and the Deep state losing control of Twitter this time it won't be so easy for them to commit the fraud.

And Trump is winning in november, btw 😉

reply

[–] robocat893 (15963) 4 months ago

Have you seen Trump lately? He's not doing well and Trump's cognitive abilities are fading fast.

Show me where Trump is winning.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Your desperation IS pathetic. I Hope you don't have an anxiety attack when he wins 😉

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

Because you have yet to refute anything I say.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Trump was winning and suddenly out of nowhere appeared millions of votes for Biden, please 🤦

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

That's not proof of anything. Show me proof.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

There were dozens of videos of the fraud in the electoral colleges, for God's sake. I am not gonna lose my time sending them to you because It looks you are a brainwashed cow and you already have determined your (fake) versión of reality.

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

All of those videos have been debunked. You know that, right?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

By Who, the fake media property of the WEF Who wants Trump out of the USA presidency? Of course, you can believe It, little NPC 🐑

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

Well with that logic there's nothing anyone can say that will ever change your mind. Your mind will forever be set with the idea that it's all one big conspiracy against Trump no matter how much anyone tries to convince you otherwise. In that case, that's on you. That's your problem.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Haha, you don't wanna discuss anything, you are convinced of the líes from the fake media property of Black rock and the World Economic forum and It Bugs you that not everyone believe that bullshit. Well, bad luck for you, reality Will hit you harder ( It looks It already does).

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

Nah, you're the one who doesn't discuss anything. If I show you any article debunking your claims you're just gonna say that those articles are written and paid for by Black Rock and the WEF or some stupid shit like that, so what's the point of discussing anything with you?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/mail-ballot-fraud-study-finds-trump-almost-certainly-won-2020

I can send you more and more studies and proofs of the 2020 fraud, but why should I care if you have already choosen what you believe?

If you weren't a 🐑 you would Accept all western media are controlled by the WEF and they want Trump out of the White House, but It looks you aren't.

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

You do realize who did that study right? The Heartland Institute. These are the same people who claim that smoking cigarettes has little to no adverse health effects.

https://www.prwatch.org/news/2014/05/12464/heartland-institute-reluctantly-stands-denial-cigarette-smoking-risks

Do you really trust these people??

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

.You see? You aren't gonna believe any alternativa media. I can send you more and more studies and proofs but It Will be useless. And this is the BEST news web in the internet, free from WEF Influences.

I also Saw the mail in ballot fraud happening in real time, btw. I can identify when fraud IS happening, because It has happened in other countries, and demócrats weren't so subtle doing It anyway.

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

Why would anyone in their right mind believe an institute that believes smoking isn't harmful to one's health?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

I also Saw the mail in ballot fraud happening in real time, btw. I can identify when fraud IS happening, because It has happened in other countries, and demócrats weren't so subtle doing It anyway

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

[deleted]

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

"WEF Influences."

So you're saying that WEF infiltrated the Heartland Institute and said that smoking isn't bad for you to make the Heartland Institute look bad or something? What? 🤣

And btw, did you actually read that Heartland Institute 2020 voter fraud study (from https://heartland.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Feb-24-2020-Election-Analysis-vWeb_Final.pdf)? The whole thing? I don't think you did, because guess what? If you had bothered to read the whole study, they found that republicans committed fraud more often than democrats.

From the study:

– Among those who cast mail-in ballots in 2020, nearly equal percentages of Democrats, Republicans and unaffiliated voters admitted to fraudulent activities. For example, 19% of Republicans, 16% of Democrats and 17% of unaffiliated voters who cast 2020 mail-in ballots say they signed a ballot or ballot envelope on behalf of a friend or family member. On the question of voting in a state where they were no longer a permanent resident. more Republican mail-in voters (24%) than Democrats (17%) or unaffiliated voters (11%) admitted doing so.

Another thing about that 2020 voter fraud study? The whole thing is based on a poll they ran regarding acts that could potentially be fraud....but then they assumed fraud from every respondent. For example, it was asked if any respondent had filled out a ballot in part or whole for a family member who used mail-in voting (to which 21% answered yes). The Heartland Institute asserts that means 21% of all mail-in votes were fraudulent but the problem is that that's not how this works! It's only fraud if the family member did not give permission. In the case of the elderly or infirm, who happen to make up the bulk of mail-in voters on an average year, it's quite common to have assistance and perfectly legal.

EDIT: I see you haven't responded to this yet. What's the matter, you don't have a rebuttal?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-demands-action-after-20-percent-mail-voters-admit-fraud-2020-election-survey

I can send you more and more, but you Will find some bullshit to say to every proof, right?

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

Even if that were true it doesn't mean an election was stolen. You completely ignore the fact that, according to that survey, the bulk of that "20%" of "fraudulent" mail in ballots were republican.

At best it's evidence that any electoral fraud trend was weighted to the Republicans benefit more than anyone else.

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

Lol, DavidM ain't gonna respond to us anymore. He knows he has no counterargument to what you and I said.

reply

[–] robocat893 (15963) 4 months ago

Since you have so much evidence that the 2020 election was rigged why haven't you turned it over to Trump? Trump could really use your help so what are you waiting for, retard?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

They already did, don't remember?

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

So Trump can't slam dunk a stolen election prosecution with irrefutable "real time" evidence? What an incompetent loser.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

He did, but it was all refuted by the corrupt establishment who works for the WEF and want him out of the White house. I know you can't understand it, some people just see the trees but can't see the forest :)

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

Do all of Trump's lawyers who have been forced to admit that they saw no evidence of the election theft but were so keen to please Donald and get him back in office that they made what they now admit to as false accusations that were proven to be baseless in court?

And what about the network who were sued by the polling machine company? Do you think media outlets like to throw hundreds of millions of dollars down the drain just for a lark and were just pretending to distribute Trump's false election theft claims, but are secretly against him?

You twits are so desperate and delusional that you forget what makes the world go round. Money. None of what you claim makes sense from a money perspective. Independent of the fact that you cannot produce evidence.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Hahaha. It's fascinating how you NPCs/leftists jump everytime someone talks about the truth about the fraud in the 2020 elections. What do you care, If it's false? Are you afraid someone may believe these "lies"?

It's also so funny because it will be the one who will be claiming there are election fraud this november when Trump wins :)

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

I don't go around justifying my actions with lazy claims of what others will or won't do in a hypothetical situation. That's pussy behaviour. You might as well go ahead and justify shitting your own pants right this second by claiming I would do the same if I were you. Knock yourself out.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

I've already show the proofs that there were fraud, wanna see it again?

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/mail-ballot-fraud-study-finds-trump-almost-certainly-won-2020

Of course you don't believe it because you are a brainwashed cow :)

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/mystery-swirls-over-batch-thousands-2020-voter-registration-forms-michigan

I can give you more and more and more...

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

Did someone just shit their pants in here?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Yes, you :)

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

Um, that has also been debunked. You realize this, right?

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-michigan-police-uncover-2020-democratic-election-plot-1820154

Most of the claims appear to be based on a report by The Gateway Pundit, a news site rated by media vetting service NewsGuard as "unreliable because it severely violates basic journalistic standards." NewsGuard's 2023 report found that Gateway Pundit repeatedly publish false content, did not gather and present information responsibly, and did not regularly correct or clarify errors.

The article relies upon a heavily redacted police report about voter registration applications. The report contains allegations that bogus forms were submitted to Muskegon City officials in Michigan in October 2020.

The report does not contain any charges. It details how after a city clerk told police that she suspected voter fraud, officers carried out an investigation into addresses including hotels and businesses associated with vehicles and names connected to that claim. The clerk suggested that information in the forms may have been faulty or contained handwriting that was similar.

As part of the police investigation, searches were carried out at multiple premises, with officers finding items at one location in Southfield, Michigan, that they say included "completed and partially completed voter registration forms" and "semi-automatic rifles joined with suppressors and optics and customized pistols."

However, the report makes no conclusion of wrongdoing. The weapons were also examined and found to be legal.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Please, me and millions of people Saw the fraud happening in real time the elections night 🤦

You can let yourself be gaslighted by the fake media all you want, but please don't ask everybody to be so stupid.

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

You're a dumbass.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Why the fuck you insult me??? I see, you cant stand the fact not everybody have been brainwashed by the corrupt WEF media like you. You are the dumbass here if you have to rely on insults.

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

You're a double dumb ass for insulting them back with the same insult.

Dumb ass.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

You see? It's absurd you ask me for proofs of the fraud because you will say every proof from independent media has been "debunked" bt the media controlled by the WEF. You have already made your chouce, what I don't understand is why you insist, are you trying to gaslight me as you have been gaslighted?

I know what I saw that night and it wasn't a clean election at all.

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

Just as I thought, you don't have a rebuttal so you're saying the same dumb shit you said before.

Like I said before, with your logic there's nothing anyone can say that will ever change your mind. Your mind will forever be set with the idea that it's all one big conspiracy against Trump no matter how much anyone tries to convince you otherwise. In that case, that's on you. That's your problem.

It's also quite telling that you have yet to respond to the last post I made about the Heartland Institute 2020 voter fraud study.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

There are more proofs and videos about the fraud, I can send you all of them although you are brainwashed and won't believe them, wanna see them anyway?

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

Send them, but don't get butthurt when I send you back links debunking them. And also, why haven't you responded to the last post I made about the Heartland Institute 2020 voter fraud study? I'll repeat it here:

"And btw, did you actually read that Heartland Institute 2020 voter fraud study (from https://heartland.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Feb-24-2020-Election-Analysis-vWeb_Final.pdf)? The whole thing? I don't think you did, because guess what? If you had bothered to read the whole study, they found that republicans committed fraud more often than democrats.

From the study:

– Among those who cast mail-in ballots in 2020, nearly equal percentages of Democrats, Republicans and unaffiliated voters admitted to fraudulent activities. For example, 19% of Republicans, 16% of Democrats and 17% of unaffiliated voters who cast 2020 mail-in ballots say they signed a ballot or ballot envelope on behalf of a friend or family member. On the question of voting in a state where they were no longer a permanent resident. more Republican mail-in voters (24%) than Democrats (17%) or unaffiliated voters (11%) admitted doing so.

Another thing about that 2020 voter fraud study? The whole thing is based on a poll they ran regarding acts that could potentially be fraud....but then they assumed fraud from every respondent. For example, it was asked if any respondent had filled out a ballot in part or whole for a family member who used mail-in voting (to which 21% answered yes). The Heartland Institute asserts that means 21% of all mail-in votes were fraudulent but the problem is that that's not how this works! It's only fraud if the family member did not give permission. In the case of the elderly or infirm, who happen to make up the bulk of mail-in voters on an average year, it's quite common to have assistance and perfectly legal."

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

You've been "brainwashed" to appreciate and understand the facts of the matter.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

I can distinguish a clear elections (like the previous ones, with maybe the exception of the 2001 elections where there were also fraud to make George Bush the winner) and a dirty one like this, the same as the last venezuelan elections were dirty too. It's NPCs like you who have been brainwashed and suddenlt can't see that everything that happened in the 2020 elections were so weird and manipulated to give Biden, a NPC candidate, the victory.

Anyway, it will be so funny when Trump wins this november and you will be the ones claiming there are fraud.

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

It's not sudden. Everyone who isn't dying to drink Trump's kool-aid has been well aware that it's been bullshit.

Trump's own former press secretary from his administration has revealed how much contempt he has for basement dwellers and how you only have to just keep repeating a lie and his followers will accept it as "proof".

Luckily, the justice system tends to deal with facts.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

You are telling me that was a normal election? Comparing with all the previous one? Of course, and the sky is green too.

It's so funny how you still jump in panic everything someone mentions the fraud, I am sure that's because deep down you know those were a very weird elections with fraud and you need to rationalize it to yourself.

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

Why would I be panicking about a matter that has already been settled in court to be bullshit?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Then why you answer me all the time, If you already know you are right and I am just a freak saying lies? What do you care?

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

Oh you don't want people answering you?

Are you ok? Are you too fragile for answers? Triggered?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

I like people answering me, but I don't understand why exactly you do it. Are yo afraid I can convince someone of the truth of the fraud, so you need to rationalize it or what?

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

You mean you don't like people challenging youand not agreeing with you then.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Not at all, I am just fascinated with the fact people like you jump in panic esch time someone with brain talks about the 2020 fraud. I don't understand why you need to defend something that, for you, is so clear and was settled in Court.

Maybe Deep down you know there was fraud and you need to justify and rationalize the oficial versión, for yourself and for other people who may read me?

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Why would you need to answer if it has been already settled in court?

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

Because it's important to point out when posters lie.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Haha why? Are you afraid someone can believe a "lie" which has been settled in a (corrupt) court?

Anyway, anyone with two eyes in their face Who hasn't been brainwashed by the leftist media could see there was fraud in the 2020 elections, as all the videos of the electoral colleges proved.

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

Yup, the WEF obviously bought me.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Sorry you aren't so important, you were just brainwashed and gaslighted like millions of others :)

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Of course, Trump was winning by far, suddenly they stopped counting and when they counted again there were thousands and thousands of votes for Biden. If it happened in Venezuela it would be fraud for sure, but you are brainwashed and think it isn't.

I don't need any study, I saw it with my eyes, if you didn't see it and wanna believe the lies of the WEF that is your problem. I've already given you the studies that prove it, I can also send the dozens of videos of the fraud happening in the elctoral colleges, that night, but why should I lose my time If you are gonna say bullshit about them (that they are false, or that "it wasn't enough fraud to change all the elections")?

reply

[–] Switchstar (342) 4 months ago

You keep repeating that over and over but it doesn't mean a damn thing. You're saying nothing of substance because you have nothing of substance.

I don't need any study, I saw it with my eyes, if you didn't see it and wanna believe the lies of the WEF that is your problem. I've already given you the studies that prove it, I can also send the dozens of videos of the fraud happening in the elctoral colleges, that night, but why should I lose my time If you are gonna say bullshit about them (that they are false, or that "it wasn't enough fraud to change all the elections")?

So using your logic, anything that disproves your claims isn't actual proof because they, according to you, "are controlled by the WEF." Then what the fuck is the point of trying to debate you if you think this about every single link I send you? Like I said before, absolutely nothing is going to change your mind because your mind is already set.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Exactly the same that you do with your sources. The diference is, aside of the fact that I read independent media, I saw the fraud happening with my eyes and I can make my own conclusions.

Have you investigated what is the WEF and who is the owner of all the media in the western world? Have you investigated what is the schedule of the WEF and why Trump opposes to it? Do it and maybe you can learn new things ;)

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

But it's due process that has determined that the claims are bullshit. Not the WEF. You're just butthurt that most of the time the media tends to report on actual judgements and decisions made by justice system. And they don't just keep repeating the losers refuted claims. One media outlet did repeat them and they discovered that law and order actually mean something that amounts to hundreds of millions of dollars of damages they needed to pay to the innocent parties they knowingly defamed.

But this is typical. Even when Alex Jones admits in court that his stories and campaigns are intended to generate income and the he knowingly spread false information for the revenue it generated from people who want to believe the stuff he says is true. Even then, despite the admission of willful wrongdoing, it's the media's fault that Jones owes grieving families millions of dollars.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

A process made by corrupt courts, so?

For God sake, there were dozens of videos of the fraud.

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

When was it established that courts that dismissed all Trump's BS cases are corrupt?

I don't mean just your reaction to Donald being slapped out of them.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

Because They accepted the fraud that happened that night. Trump was an outcast and wanted him out of the White House, in 2016 they simply didn't have enough time to make the fraud.

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

More shrill incorherent complaints never the answer to a question. Just because.

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 3 months ago

They are corrupt because they accepted the fraud, what IS so difficult to understand?

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 3 months ago

It took you a month to come back with "just because", again? Lol

reply

[–] DavidM (876) 4 months ago

WOw, for once It says the truth!

reply

[–] Martoto (5049) 4 months ago

"Alexa. Show me the evidence that the election was stolen."

"Sorry. I don't have any results for that. Here is a clip of Rudy Giuliani, standing outside the loading bay of a landscaping firm dismissing the newspaper that had called the election as running leftist misinformation, before being told by all gathered that he misheard them and he was being told that EVERY newspaper in the country had called the election for Biden."

reply